Free/Open Source vs Closed Source Software: Public Policies in the Software Market

Author(s):  
Stefano Comino ◽  
Fabio M. Manenti
Author(s):  
I. P. Antoniades ◽  
I. Samoladas ◽  
I. Stamelos ◽  
L. Angelis

This chapter will discuss attempts to produce formal mathematical models for dynamical simulation of the development process of Free/Open Source Software (F/OSS) projects. First, a brief overview for simulation methods of closed source software development is given. Then, based on empirical facts reported in F/OSS case studies, we describe a general framework for F/OSS dynamical simulation models and discuss its similarities and differences to closed source software simulation. A specific F/OSS simulation model is introduced. The model is applied to the Apache project and to the gtk+ module of the GNOME project, and simulation outputs are compared to real data. The potential of formal F/OSS simulation models to turn into practical tools used by F/OSS coordinators to predict key project factors is demonstrated. Finally, issues for further research and efforts for improvement of this first-attempt model are discussed.


Author(s):  
Ali Al Shidhani ◽  
Khalil Al Maawali ◽  
Dawood Al Abri ◽  
Hadj Bourdoucen

Nowadays, the heavy reliance on computer networks necessitates minimizing outage time, increasing the availability of services, and preventing network related problems. Such realization requires continuous monitoring and observation. This is not a trivial task. Thus, automatic network monitoring tools are deployed to monitor and analyze the traffic trespassing network devices. There is an increasing demand for automated network monitoring tools and selecting a suitable candidate can become a challenging task. Some computerized network monitoring tools and systems are available, including expensive proprietary/closed-source solutions and Free Open Source Software (FOSS) systems. Three of the most popular FOSS network monitoring systems are: Nagios, OpenNMS and Zabbix. They are solid competitors to the available proprietary solutions. This paper evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of these tools. A qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the tools were conducted through monitoring real-time network traffic. The paper presents a thorough comparison between the tools. The comparison results are vital for network administrators wishing to adopt the studied monitoring tools.


2009 ◽  
pp. 66-81
Author(s):  
Stefano Comino ◽  
Fabio M. Manenti ◽  
Alessandro Rossi

Governments’ interest in free/open source software is steadily increasing. Several policies aimed at supporting free/open source software have been taken or are currently under discussion all around the world. In this chapter, we review the basic (economic) rationales for such policy interventions and we present some summary statistics on policies taken within the European countries. We claim that in order to evaluate correctly the consequences of such interventions one has to consider both the role and the administrative level at which such decisions are taken as well as the typology of software that is involved. Moreover, we argue that the level playing field cannot be taken for granted in software markets. Therefore, non-intrusive public policies that currently prevail at the European level in terms, for instance, of the promotion of open standards or in terms of campaigns aimed at informing IT decision-makers, are likely to be welfare enhancing.


Author(s):  
Stefano Comino ◽  
Fabio M. Manenti

Governments’ interest in free/open source software is steadily increasing. Several policies aimed at supporting free/open source software have been taken or are currently under discussion all around the world. In this chapter, we review the basic (economic) rationales for such policy interventions and we present some summary statistics on policies taken within the European countries. We claim that in order to evaluate correctly the consequences of such interventions one has to consider both the role and the administrative level at which such decisions are taken as well as the typology of software that is involved. Moreover, we argue that the level playing field cannot be taken for granted in software markets. Therefore, non-intrusive public policies that currently prevail at the European level in terms, for instance, of the promotion of open standards or in terms of campaigns aimed at informing IT decision-makers, are likely to be welfare enhancing.


Author(s):  
I. P. Antoniades ◽  
I. Samoladas ◽  
I. Stamelos ◽  
L. Angelis ◽  
G. L. Bleris

This chapter will discuss attempts to produce formal mathematical models for dynamical simulation of the development process of Free/Open Source Software (F/OSS) projects. First, a brief overview for simulation methods of closed source software development is given. Then, based on empirical facts reported in F/OSS case studies, we describe a general framework for F/OSS dynamical simulation models and discuss its similarities and differences to closed source software simulation. A specific F/OSS simulation model is introduced. The model is applied to the Apache project and to the gtk+ module of the GNOME project, and simulation outputs are compared to real data. The potential of formal F/OSS simulation models to turn into practical tools used by F/OSS coordinators to predict key project factors is demonstrated. Finally, issues for further research and efforts for improvement of this first-attempt model are discussed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Raditya Faisal Waliulu ◽  
Muhammad Syahrul Kahar

  Acronym FOSS is a free open source software. The FOSS program is a license that allows users to run the program freely for any purpose, modify the program as desired and also distribute copies of the original version or modified version freely, which is why select open source from closed source. Closed-source software is sometimes pressed to build in the background or other unwanted and secret features into the software. Instead of having to trust users of FOSS software vendors can check and verify the source code itself and can put trust in the community of volunteers and users. FOSS is not equivalent to priceless software, it's more like a command for open-source software with freedom granted at various levels (depending on license). For this, the license does not need to be included in the list, If the software follows the Open Source command and the license is compatible then at least one of the Open Source licenses. Student involvement in SMK Negeri 1 Kabupaten Sorong is the best place to give advice about FOSS because it is one of the favorite schools in Sorong regency.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document