Catastrophic rapid onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia - Victim of our own success

2010 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Nanda ◽  
S.G. Sharma ◽  
S. Longo
2012 ◽  
Vol 107 (04) ◽  
pp. 795-797 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damien Barraud ◽  
Marie Toussaint-Hacquard ◽  
Pierre-Edouard Bollaert ◽  
Thomas Lecompte ◽  
Julien Perrin

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (11) ◽  
pp. 1285-1293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas L. Ortel ◽  
Doruk Erkan ◽  
Craig S. Kitchens

Abstract Catastrophic thrombotic syndromes are characterized by rapid onset of multiple thromboembolic occlusions affecting diverse vascular beds. Patients may have multiple events on presentation, or develop them rapidly over days to weeks. Several disorders can present with this extreme clinical phenotype, including catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), atypical presentations of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), and Trousseau syndrome, but some patients present with multiple thrombotic events in the absence of associated prothrombotic disorders. Diagnostic workup must rapidly determine which, if any, of these syndromes are present because therapeutic management is driven by the underlying disorder. With the exception of atypical presentations of TTP, which are treated with plasma exchange, anticoagulation is the most important therapeutic intervention in these patients. Effective anticoagulation may require laboratory confirmation with anti–factor Xa levels in patients treated with heparin, especially if the baseline (pretreatment) activated partial thromboplastin time is prolonged. Patients with catastrophic APS also benefit from immunosuppressive therapy and/or plasma exchange, whereas patients with HIT need an alternative anticoagulant to replace heparin. Progressive thrombotic events despite therapeutic anticoagulation may necessitate an alternative therapeutic strategy. If the thrombotic process can be controlled, these patients can recover, but indefinite anticoagulant therapy may be appropriate to prevent recurrent events.


2002 ◽  
Vol 126 (11) ◽  
pp. 1415-1423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore E. Warkentin

Abstract Objective.—Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an antibody-mediated adverse drug reaction that paradoxically is associated with a brief but dramatically increased risk for thrombosis (transient acquired thrombophilia). The objective of this article is to provide practical recommendations for platelet count monitoring in patients receiving heparin, as well as for selection of laboratory assays to detect pathogenic HIT antibodies. Study Selection.—Relevant literature that focused on frequency and timing of HIT in various clinical settings and that dealt with laboratory testing for HIT antibodies was critically appraised. Data Extraction and Synthesis.—The author prepared a preliminary manuscript including recommendations that was presented to participants at the College of American Pathologists Conference XXXVI: Diagnostic Issues in Thrombophilia (November 10, 2001). Support of at least 70% of conference participants was required for recommendations to be adopted. Conclusions.—The risk of immune HIT varies depending on the type of heparin (unfractionated heparin greater than low-molecular-weight heparin) and patient population (surgical greater than medical). Thus, the intensity of platelet count monitoring should be stratified depending on the clinical situation. Platelet count monitoring should focus on the period of highest risk (usually days 5 to 10 after starting heparin) and should use an appropriate platelet count baseline (generally, the highest platelet count beginning 4 days after start of heparin). However, earlier platelet count monitoring is appropriate if the patient received heparin within the past 100 days, as already circulating HIT antibodies can cause rapid-onset HIT with heparin reexposure. Although both antigen and (washed platelet) activation assays are very sensitive for detecting clinically significant HIT antibodies, activation assays have greater diagnostic specificity for clinical HIT.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 113 (20) ◽  
pp. 4970-4976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Greinacher ◽  
Thomas Kohlmann ◽  
Ulrike Strobel ◽  
Jo-Ann I. Sheppard ◽  
Theodore E. Warkentin

The immune response in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is puzzling: heparin-naive patients can develop IgG antibodies and clinical HIT as early as day 5, and evidence for an anamnestic response on heparin reexposure is lacking. We assessed daily serum samples by anti-PF4/heparin enzyme-immunoassay (EIA) in patients receiving heparin thromboprophylaxis. Of 435 patients, 56.1% showed an increase in EIA optical density (OD) of more than or equal to 15%, with more than 90% starting between days 4 and 14. After reaching maximum reactivity by days 10 to 12, ODs declined despite heparin continuation, including in 2 patients with clinical HIT. Individual IgG/A/M classes showed identical time of onset (median, day 6). Most (58.7%) antibody-positive patients developed all 3 Ig classes; only 11.3% lacked IgG response. IgG/A/M increase usually occurred simultaneously (± 1 day) with no general tendency for IgM precedence. Consistent with the transient immune response, none of the IgG-EIA–positive (OD > 0.5) patients at discharge developed clinically evident thrombosis during extended low-molecular-weight heparin thromboprophylaxis. The rapid onset of the anti-PF4/heparin immune response, its transience, and the simultaneous appearance of antibodies of different classes with no IgM precedence suggest short-term activation of B cells that have previously undergone Ig-class switching even without previous pharmacologic heparin exposure.


Platelets ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 495-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zsolt Olah ◽  
Adrienne Kerenyi ◽  
Janos Kappelmayer ◽  
Agota Schlammadinger ◽  
Katalin Razso ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (07) ◽  
pp. 171-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ume Stadelmair ◽  
Oliver Schmidt ◽  
Werner Lang

2000 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Araujo ◽  
J. J. Sa ◽  
V. Araujo ◽  
M. Lopes ◽  
L. M. Cunha-Ribeiro

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 277-278
Author(s):  
Alberto Franco-Akel ◽  
Janpreet Bhandohal ◽  
Mohammad Saeed ◽  
Devendra Tripathi
Keyword(s):  

VASA ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Di Pilla ◽  
Stefano Barco ◽  
Clara Sacco ◽  
Giovanni Barosi ◽  
Corrado Lodigiani

Summary: A 49-year-old man was diagnosed with pre-fibrotic myelofibrosis after acute left lower-limb ischemia requiring amputation and portal vein thrombosis. After surgery he developed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) with venous thromboembolism, successfully treated with argatroban followed by dabigatran. Our systematic review of the literature supports the use of dabigatran for suspected HIT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document