scholarly journals A 9-year follow-up of a self-management group intervention for persistent neck pain in primary health care: a randomized controlled trial

2016 ◽  
Vol Volume 10 ◽  
pp. 53-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catharina Gustavsson ◽  
Lena von Koch
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Group Intervention ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Management Group ◽  
Primary Health

scholarly journals Person-Centered Interactive Self-Management Support in Primary Health Care for People with Type 2 Diabetes: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

10.2196/10250 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. e10250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrika Öberg ◽  
Ulf Isaksson ◽  
Lena Jutterström ◽  
Carljohan Orre ◽  
Åsa Hörnsten
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Management Support ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Primary Health

scholarly journals Effect of preventive health screening on long-term primary health care utilization. A randomized controlled trial

2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 242-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
JL Thomsen ◽  
ET Parner ◽  
B Karlsmose ◽  
AM Thulstrup ◽  
T Lauritzen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Preventive Health ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
Preventive Health Screening

scholarly journals Health TAPESTRY Ontario: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial to Test Reproducibility and Implementation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dee Mangin ◽  
Larkin Lamarche ◽  
Sivan Bomze ◽  
Sayem Borhan ◽  
Tracy Browne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
Diverse Communities

Abstract Background: Health TAPESTRY (Health Teams Advancing Patient Experience: STRengthening qualitY) aims to help people stay healthier for longer where they live by providing person-focused care through the integration of four key program components: 1) trained volunteers who visit clients in their homes, 2) an interprofessional primary health care team, 3) use of technology to collect and share information, and 4) improved connections to community health and social services. The initial randomized controlled trial of Health TAPESTRY found promising results in terms of health care use and patient outcomes, indicating a shift from reactive to preventive care. The trial was based on one clinical academic centre, thus limiting generalizability. The study objectives are: 1) to test reproducibility of the established effectiveness of Health TAPESTRY on physical activity and hospitalizations, 2) to test the feasibility of, and understand the contributing factors to, the implementation of Health TAPESTRY in six diverse communities across Ontario, Canada, and 3) to determine the value for money of implementing Health TAPESTRY. Methods : This planned study is a pragmatic parallel randomized controlled trial with a delayed intervention for control participants at six months. This trial will simultaneously assess effectiveness and implementation in a real world setting (Type II hybrid) in six diverse communities across Ontario. Participants 70 years of age and older will be randomized into the Health TAPESTRY intervention or the control group (usual care). Intervention clients will receive an individualized plan of care from an interprofessional care team. The plan will be based on a client’s goals and current health risks identified through volunteer visits. The study’s outcomes are mapped onto the RE-AIM framework, with levels of physical activity and number of hospitalizations as the co-primary outcomes. The main analysis will be a comparison at six months. Discussion: It is important to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of Health TAPESTRY in multiple communities prior to scaling or widespread adoption. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03397836 (posted January 12, 2018). Keywords: Primary health care, Randomized controlled trial, Integrated care, Interdisciplinary health care teams, Health care volunteers, Older adults, Implementation

scholarly journals Does mhGAP training of primary health care providers improve the identification of child- and adolescent mental, neurological or substance use disorders? Results from a randomized controlled trial in Uganda

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Akol ◽  
F. Makumbi ◽  
J. N. Babirye ◽  
J. S. Nalugya ◽  
S. Nshemereirwe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Child And Adolescent ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Primary Health

Background.Integrating child and adolescent mental health (CAMH) into primary health care (PHC) using the WHO mental health gap action program (mhGAP) is recommended for closing a mental health treatment gap in low- and middle-income countries, but PHC providers have limited ability to detect CAMH disorders. We aimed to evaluate the effect of PHC provider mhGAP training on CAMH disorder identification in Eastern Uganda.Methods.Thirty-six PHC clinics participated in a randomized controlled trial which compared the proportion of intervention (n= 18) to control (n= 18) clinics with a non-epilepsy CAMH diagnosis over 3 consecutive months following mhGAP-oriented CAMH training. Fisher's exact test and logistic regression based on intention to treat principles were applied. (clinicaltrials.gov registration NCT02552056).Results.Nearly two thirds (63.8%, 23/36) of all clinics identified and recorded at least one non-epilepsy CAMH diagnosis from 40 692 clinic visits of patients aged 1–18 recorded over 4 months. The proportion of clinics with a non-epilepsy CAMH diagnosis prior to training was 27.7% (10/36, similar between study arms). Training did not significantly improve intervention clinics’ non-epilepsy CAMH diagnosis (13/18, 72.2%) relative to the control (7/18, 38.9%) arm,p= 0.092. The odds of identifying and recording a non-epilepsy CAMH diagnosis were 2.5 times higher in the intervention than control arms at the end of 3 months of follow-up [adj.OR 2.48; 95% CI (1.31–4.68);p= 0.005].Conclusion.In this setting, mhGAP CAMH training of PHC providers increases PHC clinics’ identification and reporting of non-epilepsy CAMH cases but this increase did not reach statistical significance.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of olive oil for the prevention of pressure ulcers caused in immobilized patients within the scope of primary health care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inmaculada Lupiáñez-Pérez ◽  
Juan Morilla-Herrera ◽  
Leovigildo Ginel-Mendoza ◽  
Francisco Martín-Santos ◽  
Francisco Navarro-Moya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Olive Oil ◽  
Study Protocol ◽  
Pressure Ulcers ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
Care Study

scholarly journals Long-term hospital-based secondary prevention of coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anete Kaldal ◽  
Serena Tonstad ◽  
Jarle Jortveit
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Ldl Cholesterol ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Composite Endpoint ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Primary Health

Abstract Background and aims Despite established guidelines on secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, practical implementation of treatment targets is deficient even in high-income countries. This study compared long-term hospital-based treatment with follow-up at primary health care regarding new cardiovascular events and achievement of treatment targets. Methods This randomized controlled trial at Sørlandet Hospital, Norway 2007–2021 included patients hospitalized due to myocardial infarction (n = 760) or after scheduled percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n = 677) or coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 103). Patients were randomized to hospital-based secondary preventive care with consultations 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after the index event and annually for up to 5 years, or follow-up at primary health care. Final data was collected after 10 years and hazard ratios were calculated using Cox regression analyses. Results Composite endpoint-free survival due to a lower rate of PCI improved in patients with hospital-based follow-up (n = 788) compared to patients followed-up at primary health care (n = 752) (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66–0.96; p = 0.02) but all-cause mortality was not reduced (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.59–1.56; p = 0.86). At 1 year, LDL-cholesterol (2.1 [SD 0.7] versus 2.3 [SD 0.8] mmol/l; p < 0.001) and systolic blood pressure (132 [SD 16] versus 142 [SD 20] mm/Hg; p < 0.001) were lower in the hospital-based group, and the differences remained significant during the first 5 years. Other secondary preventive measures (smoking cessation, physical activity, body weight, glucose control, drug adherence) did not differ. Conclusions Long-term hospital-based secondary preventive follow-up improved composite endpoint-free survival, but not mortality. Substantial risk factors remained unaddressed. The beneficial effects on blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol disappeared after annual consultations ceased. Trial registration: The study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00679237) May 16, 2008.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document