scholarly journals USEFULNESS OF THE PEDIATRIC INDEX OF MORTALITY 2 IN PREDICTING MORTALITY RATE IN BENHA UNIVERSITY PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE CARE UNIT.

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 805-815 ◽  
Author(s):  
HeshamAbdulAziz Elghaiaty ◽  
◽  
AhmadAta Sobeih ◽  
EmanAbdErrahim Bayoumy ◽  
◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol In Press (In Press) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hossein Saidi ◽  
Hamed Basir Ghafouri ◽  
Hamed Aghdam ◽  
Ghamartaj Khanbabaei ◽  
Narges Ahmadizadeh ◽  
...  

Objectives: The research aimed to evaluate the Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 (PIM-3) for determining the risk of mortality among pediatric intensive care unit patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on case records, as well as patient data from all admissions to the PICU of Mofid Children’s Hospital, Tehran, from October 2017 to February 2018. Employing an android calculator application, the PIM-3 score was estimated early within the first PICU admission. Then, the PIM-3 score and mortality rate were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. In addition, calibration and discrimination were assessed by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test and a receiver operating characteristic curve method, respectively. Finally, the Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR) was calculated. Results: In this study, 365 young infants, ranging from 10 to 29-months-old, were included. The overall mortality rate was 10.4%. Further, the patients’ PIM-3 scores ranged from 0.06% to 2.37% (95% confidence interval), with a mean of 1.45% (4.16% in non-survivors and 1.14% in survivors). The SMR was estimated at 7.18, demonstrating the underprediction of the death rate. The AUC of 0.714 (95% CI: 0.626 to 0.801) demonstrated a fair to good discrimination power of PIM-3 as an international standard risk-adjusted mortality indicator. Moreover, this score underpredicted the risk of mortality in young infants admitted to our ICU in 2017. Generally, the prediction was weak among low-risk patients. Therefore, the Pediatric Index of Mortality-3 score has the potential to be implemented in our PICU by modifying the expected probability of death by multiplying the original PIM-3 score by 7.12.


Author(s):  
Shifa Nismath ◽  
Suchetha S. Rao ◽  
B. S. Baliga ◽  
Vaman Kulkarni ◽  
Gayatri M. Rao

Abstract Background Predicting morbidity and mortality in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is of extreme importance to make precise decisions for better outcomes. Aim We compared the urine albumin creatinine ratio (ACR) with the established PICU score, pediatric index of mortality 2 (PIM 2) for predicting PICU outcomes. Methods This cross-sectional study enrolled 67 patients admitted to PICU with systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Urine ACR was estimated on admission, and PIM 2 score was calculated. ACR was compared with PIM 2 for PICU outcome measures: the need for inotropes, development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), duration of PICU stay, and survival. Results Microalbuminuria was found in 77.6% of patients with a median ACR of 80 mg/g. ACR showed a significant association with the need for inotropes (p < 0.001), MODS (p = 0.001), and significant correlation to PICU stay (p 0.001, rho = 0.361). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for ACR (0.798) was comparable to that of PIM 2 (0.896). The cutoff value of ACR derived to predict mortality was 110 mg/g. The study subjects were divided into 2 groups: below cutoff and above the cutoff. Outcome variables, inotrope use, MODS, mortality, and PICU stay compared between these subgroups, were statistically significant. Conclusion ACR is a good predictor of PICU outcomes and is comparable to PIM 2 for mortality prediction.


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-41
Author(s):  
Ahmed Abd El Basset Abo-El Ezz ◽  
Khaled T. Abu-Ela ◽  
Aml Z. Abd Elaziz ◽  
Maaly M. Mabrouk ◽  
Ehab Abd Elhalem Abo Ali

2011 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 89
Author(s):  
Feiby Julianto ◽  
Adrian Umboh ◽  
Suryadi Tatura

Background Sepsis is a commonly seen emergency case in the pediatric intensive care unit.1 Severe sepsis mortality rate in developed country andin developing country such as Indonesia are 9% and 50-70%, respectively. Furthennore, the mortality rate in septic shock is 80%.2 Several researches documented increasing rate of acute kidney injury (AKI) incidence correlated 'With sepsis. Clinical intervention identification may decrease AKI and sepsis incidence.Objective To identify the correlation between incidence of AKI in sepsis and in septic shock patients who was treated in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).Methods A cross sectional study was perfonned in 37 patients diagnosed as sepsis according ACCP/SCCM criteria for children aged 1 month to 13 years. The study was conducted in Pediatric Department, Prof. Dr. R.D. Kandou hospital from April 2009 to June 2009.Results From 37 sepsis patients, 27 were boys and 10 were girls. In the sepsis group (n=27) 10 had AKI, and in the septic shock group (n= 10) had AKI. Phi correlation coefficient applied to statistically analyzed sepsis in correlation with AKI (creatinin serum and GFR). Significant Phi correlation coefficient was (r=0.117; P> 0.05)Conclusions The study concludes that there is no correlation of renal function impainnent Mth sepsis and septic shock.


1999 ◽  
Vol 27 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 147A
Author(s):  
Albert Bousso ◽  
Jose Fernandes ◽  
Iracema Fernandes ◽  
Andrea Cordeiro ◽  
Shieh Hsin ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sangita Puree Dhungana ◽  
P.P. Panta ◽  
S.K. Shrestha ◽  
S. Shrestha

Various scoring system have been developed and are becoming essential part of Pediatric and other critical care units. The Pediatric department wants to introduce Pediatric Index of Mortality-2 (PIM 2) as a predictive scoring system in Pediatric critical care unit of Nepal Medical College Teaching Hospital (NMCTH). This was a prospective cohort study done in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) of NMCTH. Study was done from August 2017 to December 2018. All cases admitted in ICU were taken consecutively from term newborn to 14 yrs of age. PIM 2 scoring system was done in all patients. PIM 2 performed well in terms of discrimination with area under curve for PIM 2 scor e was 0.809 with 95% Confidence Interval of 0.0709 to 0.910 and Standard Error of 0.051. Good calibration was observed across deciles of risk as measured by Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test with P value of 0.163, chi-square value of 11.752 (8). Mortality observed in our PICU was 28.4% with standardized mortality ratio of 1. PIM 2 scoring system performed well in our PICU.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document