scholarly journals Land and Sea Breezes and Diurnal Variation of the Barometric Pressure

1934 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 345-353
Author(s):  
H. ARAKAWA

1. In a previous communication I proved that the Diurnal Variation of Terrestrial Magnetism has its origin outside the earth’s surface and drew the natural conclusion that it was caused by electric currents circulating in the upper regions of the atmosphere. If we endeavour to carry the investigation a step further and enquire into the probable origin of these currents, we have at present no alternative to the theory first proposed by Balfour Stewart that the necessary electromotive forces are supplied by the permanent forces of terrestrial magnetism acting on the bodily motion of masses of conducting air which cut through its lines of force. In the language of modern electrodynamics the periodic magnetic disturbance is due to Foucault currents induced in an oscillating atmosphere by the vertical magnetic force. The problem to he solved in the first instance is the specification of the internal motion of a conducting shell of air, which shall, under the action of given magnetic forces, determine the electric currents producing known electromagnetic effects. Treating the diurnal and semidiurnal variations separately, the calculation leads to the interesting results that each of them is caused by an oscillation of the atmosphere which is of the same nature as that which causes the diurnal changes of barometric pressure. The phases of the barometric and magnetic oscillations agree to about 1¾ hours, and it is doubtful whether this difference may not be due to uncertainties in the experimental data. In the previous communication referred to I already tentatively suggested a connexion between the barometric and magnetic changes, but it is only recently that I have examined the matter more closely. In the investigation which follows I begin by considering the possibility that both variations are due to one and the same general oscillation of the atmosphere. The problem is then absolutely determined if the barometric change is known, and we may calculate within certain limits the conducting power of the air which is sufficient and necessary to produce the observed magnetic effects ; this conducting power is found to be considerable. It is to be observed, however, that the electric currents producing the magnetic variations circulate only in the upper layers of the atmosphere, where the pressure is too small to affect the barometer; the two variations have their origin therefore in different layers, which may to some extent oscillate independently. Though we shall find that the facts may be reconciled with the simpler supposition of one united oscillation of the whole shell of air, there are certain difficulties which are most easily explained by assuming possible differences in phase and amplitude between the upper and lower layers. If the two oscillations are quite independent, the conducting power depending on the now unknown amplitude of the periodic motion cannot be calculated, but must still be large, unless the amplitude reaches a higher order of magnitude than we have any reason to assume.


In a previous paper, called E 1 for brevity, I discussed the results obtained for the diurnal variation of the potential gradient of atmospheric electricity at Kew Observatory from 1898 to 1904. The present paper deals with the same subject, but employs data from the fifteen years 1898 to 1912. The earlier period of seven years, though longer than that available at most observatories, was too short to give a satisfactorily representative presentation of some of the phenomena. To obtain results fairly characteristic of the locality many years data are required of some of the meteorological elements, especially barometric pressure and rainfall. For the latter element, in fact, a considerably longer period is desirable than that available even now for potential gradient at Kew. The same may be true of potential gradient itself, but various reasons exist for not waiting longer. Owing to building operations, the electrograph results for 1913 were exposed to special uncertainties. Also the transfer of the electrograph from the position it has occupied since 1898 is now in contemplation. Thus 1912 may be regarded as ending an epoch. Another reason requires fuller explanation. The Kew water-dropper—the earliest it is believed in regular operation—was erected in 1861 under Lord Kelvin’s personal supervision. The original electrometer and batteries as they decayed were replaced by others, but the instrument remained essentially unchanged in its original site until 1896. Of the records obtained prior to that date those of only three years had been discussed, two years, 1862 to 1864, by Prof. J. D. Everett, and one year, 1880, by Mr. G. M Whipple. In both cases the results were expressed in what were really arbitrary units. The relation between the voltage shown by the instrument and the true potential gradient in the open was altogether unknown.


1877 ◽  
Vol 25 (171-178) ◽  
pp. 402-411

In a paper which was read before the Royal Society in 1873, and which was honoured with a place in the 'Philosophical Transactions' of that year, I discussed the diurnal variations of the wind and barometric pressure at Bombay, and deduced therefrom the fact that a system of diurnal wind-currents moves synchronally with the diurnal variation of barometric pressure. Reasons, were given for believing that that system of diurnal wind-currents is a universal phenomenon; and on that hypothesis I showed how the diurnal variations of the barometer could be explained as a result of those currents. I have lately examined closely the “Discussion of the Anemometrical Results furnished by the self-recording Anemometer at Bermuda,” which forms Appendix II. of the ‘Quarterly Weather-Report of the Meteorological Office, London,’ July to September 1872. Those results support the conclusions arrived at in my former paper in such a remarkable manner as to justify the readvancement of some of them in a form which will prominently exhibit their relation to the diurnal variation of the barometer.


2007 ◽  
Vol 135 (6) ◽  
pp. 2155-2167 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. K. Basu

Abstract Satellite-derived hourly precipitation values over India and neighboring areas are examined during the summer monsoon season of 2004 to determine the observed patterns of diurnal variations. These are compared with the patterns found in the forecasts from the global spectral model in operation at the National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting in India. The observed hourly precipitation shows that maximum amounts are recorded over most areas of India during the afternoon hours, coinciding with the maximum in surface temperature. This pattern is modified in areas where local mesoscale events like katabatic winds or land–sea breezes produce strong convergence patterns and associated convection. The model forecasts weaken the mesoscale effects on precipitation and the convection due to ground heating seems to start in the model 2–3 h before the time it is observed by the satellites. The frequency and amount of precipitation increases with the forecast length but the hour of maximum precipitation remains almost the same. Harmonic analysis of the frequency of observed precipitation shows that the diurnal cycle predominates in both magnitude and the amount of variance explained. The semidiurnal cycle is considerably smaller in magnitude and explains significant variance only over a small area. Other cycles of smaller periodicity are unimportant in the diurnal variation of precipitation. A similar result is also obtained for the model forecasts except that the spatial distributions of amplitude and variance explained are different from that obtained from the observed data. The spatial distribution and values remain almost the same with forecast length.


1966 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 1329-1347 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bercovitch

We have established the correlation between the atmospheric temperature contribution to the diurnal variation observed by a meson monitor at Deep River and the diurnal variation of two easily and continuously observable atmospheric variables, the ground-level air temperature and the barometric pressure. The atmospheric meson diurnal variation vector is taken to be, on a statistical basis, A = M−RN, where M and N represent the observed meson-monitor and neutron-monitor diurnal variations and R is the factor of proportionality between the meson and neutron monitor responses to the primary anisotropy. It is found that A is proportional in amplitude to T, the ground-level temperature diurnal variation, and, further, that T and the barometric-pressure diurnal variation P are proportional in amplitude. The "best-fit" representation of A in terms of T and P is determined by minimizing the mean-square deviation between the daily vectors RN and (M−A). Where A = CtT + CpP, the best fit occurs when Ct = −0.0052%/ °C, Cp = 0.038%/mb, R = 0.47, and the phase of T is shifted by + 1.0 hour. These values apply to Deep River, where the original hourly meson data have been barometer-corrected using a coefficient of 0.16%/mb.


1852 ◽  
Vol 142 ◽  
pp. 125-129 ◽  

At the commencement of the year 1847, a paper by Colonel Sabine, R. A., V. P. R. S., was read before the Royal Society on the Lunar Atmospheric Tide at St. Helena. The influence of the moon upon the barometer, although small in amount, was shown in a very striking and decided manner; for after eliminating the regular diurnal variation, the differences arranged in lunar tables showed a decided maximum, both at the superior and inferior culmination of the moon, and a decided minimum at its rising and setting. The effect which the moon’s position, relatively to the meridian of the place, had upon the barometric pressure, was publicly noticed, about the middle of 1842, by Captain Lefroy, R. A., who appears to have had his attention directed to it from the first establishment of the observatory at St. Helena.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document