scholarly journals Article Review – Short Communication on Probiotic Claim Substantiation

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 70-75
Author(s):  
Tsukasa Jonathan Tanaka

This article review focused on the analysis of the journal article “More Information Needed on Probiotic Supplement Product Labels” by Merenstein et al., 2019, published in the Journal of General Internal Medicine. The aim of such a review was to communicate a short critique as well as highlighting the need for fieldwork in regulatory compliance. Here, the review started with a general summary of the article, but also in conjunction with the literature review that the authors established. This was necessary to understand the article in its field of expertise whilst giving a clearer purpose on the need for more fieldwork of this kind. Without such understanding, it would have been difficult to understand the regulatory compliance of dietary supplement label regulations in the US. Then, a thorough analysis and deconstruction of the articles structure, as well as article critique, were established. The authority of the paper and other topics such as authority, accuracy, relevance, etc., were examined for effectiveness in conveying the research question that the authors were concerned with; that more information may be needed for product labels in probiotic supplements in the US. Lastly, the graphs, tables, and figures were evaluated to make a conclusion about the study as well as a discussion on the recent advances related to the label compliance of probiotic supplements. The paper, albeit was on the shorter side, was effective and was also simple in establishing a need for more information on the label. Thus, more transparency on clinical substantiation is needed.

1986 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 285-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert H. Fletcher ◽  
Robert C. Burack ◽  
Eric B. Larson ◽  
Charles E. Lewis ◽  
J. Jay Noren ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Utibe R. Essien ◽  
Renuka Tipirneni ◽  
Lucinda B. Leung ◽  
Madeline R. Sterling

2014 ◽  
Vol 05 (03) ◽  
pp. 814-816 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Morra ◽  
V. Lo ◽  
S. Quan ◽  
R. Wu ◽  
K. Tran

Summary Objective: To describe the uses of institutional and personal smartphones on General Internal Medicine wards and highlight potential consequences from their use. Methods: A mixed methods study consisting of both quantitative and qualitative research methods was conducted in General Internal Medicine wards across four academic teaching hospitals in Toronto, Ontario. Participants included medical students, residents, attending physicians and allied health professionals. Data collection consisted of work shadowing observations, semi-structured interviews and surveys. Results: Personal smartphones were used for both clinical communication and non-work-related activities. Clinicians used their personal devices to communicate with their medical teams and with other medical specialties and healthcare professionals. Participants understood the risks associated with communicating confidential health information via their personal smartphones, but appear to favor efficiency over privacy issues. From survey responses, 9 of 23 residents (39%) reported using their personal cell phones to email or text patient information that may have contained patient identifiers. Although some residents were observed using their personal smartphones for non-work-related activities, personal use was infrequent and most residents did not engage in this activity. Conclusion: Clinicians are using personal smartphones for work-related purposes on the wards. With the increasing popularity of smartphone devices, it is anticipated that an increasing number of clinicians will use their personal smartphones for clinical work. This trend poses risks to the secure transfer of confidential personal health information and may lead to increased distractions for clinicians. Citation: Tran K, Morra D, Lo V, Quan S, Wu R. The use of smartphones on General Internal Medicine wards: A mixed methods study. Appl Clin Inf 2014; 5: 814–823http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2014-02-RA-0011


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document