Effect of Delayed Dentin Sealing versus Immediate Dentin Sealing on Tensile Bond Strength of Ceramic Restoration Material. -An in vitro study-

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-257
Author(s):  
Shaimaa Abdulrahman ◽  
Maged Zohdy
2003 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Pithan ◽  
Ricardo de Sousa Vieira ◽  
Marcelo Carvalho Chain

The aim of this study was to measure in vitro; the tensile bond strength of three intracanal posts used in anterior primary teeth. A total of 45 single rooted primary anterior teeth were selected for the study and the crowns sectioned leaving 1mm above the cement-enamel junction. The roots were then assigned to three groups according the type of retention used. All roots were endodonticaly treated, a 4-mm of the canal was cleansed and a base of glass ionomer cement was put at the bottom of the prepared canal. The roots were then prepared to receive intracanal posts using a # 4137 diamond bur (KG Sorensen) used in a depth of 3-mm of the length of the canal. All the prepared roots were acid etched with a 37% phosphoric acid gel for 15 seconds, rinsed, dried and the dentin adhesive Single Bond (3M) was applied. Group I received intracanal posts and cores made of composite resin (Filtek Z 250, 3M). Group II intracanal posts were made from a 0.6mm orthodontic wire bent as a Greek letter type (gamma), fixed with the Z 250 composite resin and cores were built with the same composite. Finally Group III received intracanal retention made of a fiber glass post (Fibrekor Post, Generic/Pentron) with 1.25mm diameter, fixed with Z 250 and cores were made like the other groups. The samples were submitted to tension in a universal- testing machine (Instron, model 4444). Statistical analysis (ANOVA) reveled that there were no statistically significant differences between the groups. On the basis of the results of this in vitro study it was concluded that the type of intracanal post did not interfere with the tensile strength and the most frequent type of failure was of adhesive type, corresponding to 74% of the sample.


2004 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Maurer ◽  
Katrin Bekes ◽  
Christian R Gernhardt ◽  
Hans-Günter Schaller ◽  
Johannes Schubert

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priyanka Sarangi ◽  
Sandhyarani Mohanty ◽  
Subasish Behera ◽  
Soumyaranjan Nanda ◽  
SukantaKumar Satapathy ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document