scholarly journals A Methodology for Human Factors Utility Analysis in Quality Inspiction Workstation Design.(Dept.M)

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 61-69
Author(s):  
Ahmed Abd El-Shafi ◽  
Syed Naqvi
Author(s):  
Mark W. Smolensky

This panel addresses the extent to which students should be exposed to both human factors psychology and industrial/organizational psychology. Should a combined curriculum be developed called work psychology that would have a core set of courses including both industrial/organizational and human factors while still permitting students to specialize? Should courses should be taught in a holistic fashion? For example, when covering the topic of workplace design, should such topics as workstation design, ergonomics, and shift work be augmented with organizational topics as fatigue, boredom, morale, teamwork, job enrichment, and safety? Conversely, is there, perhaps, strong justification for continuing to maintain two distinct disciplines? The panel members straddle the continuum from advocating continued separation of the two disciplines to re-integrating the two disciplines.


1988 ◽  
Vol 32 (16) ◽  
pp. 1090-1094
Author(s):  
Phillip J. Andrews ◽  
Kathryn E. Permenter ◽  
David R. Eike ◽  
Thomas B. Malone

This paper describes the state and status of human factors within the Space and Naval Warfare Command (SPAWAR) by focusing on a major effort currently being pursued within SPAWAR, that of developing a standard workstation design concept for Navy applications. Human factors concerns were paramount in the assessment of requirements for a standardized workstation applicable to Navy-wide requirements. The major human factors concern was display usability.


1985 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 13-15
Author(s):  
Fergus Hampton

1982 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 295-299
Author(s):  
Jayne M. Schurick ◽  
Martin G. Helander ◽  
Patricia A. Billingsley

This report summarizes a review of human factors research on VDTs. The main areas of interest included workstation design, character and display design, work organization, lighting and reflectance, and visual discomfort. Experimental studies were critically reviewed for the soundness of their methodologies and conclusions. In many of the studies, there were problems of interpreting the results due to careless oversights on the part of the researcher(s), for example, the inappropriate selection of subjects or lack of a control group. Due to different subject selection strategies and different VDT parameters, the integration and generalization of research results is difficult.


1990 ◽  
Vol 54 (11) ◽  
pp. 688-689 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Jacobson ◽  
B Maxson ◽  
K Mays ◽  
J Peebles ◽  
C Kowalski

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document