scholarly journals CRITICAL CARE NURSES' KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICES REGARDING CENTRAL VENOUS LINE CARE BUNDLE AT EMERGENCY HOSPITAL, MANSOURA UNIVERSITY

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 173-183
Author(s):  
Shimaa Awad ◽  
Hanaa Elfeky ◽  
Mohamed Sultan ◽  
Asmaa Abo Seda
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (7) ◽  
pp. 01-05
Author(s):  
Alfateh Noor

Accidental critical care device removals in intensive care units (ICUs) are serious preventable incidents that have major implications. The study aimed to understand possible causes of such events and identify interventions that reduced their occurrence. The researchers conducted a single-center audit by collecting patient data and bundle forms for accidental device removal across two consecutive periods; they retrospectively reviewed the data from the first period (August 1, 2019 to January 31, 2020) and prospectively analyzed the data from the bundle forms obtained in the second (February 1, 2020 to July 31, 2020). From the findings of the first period, the researchers designed an intervention comprising nurses’ adherence to a care bundle checklist and an educational campaign for the care-taking team and applied it in the second period. Patients either accidentally removed the central venous lines secondary to agitation (47%), or it happened by loss of catheter securement (21%), or during daily care (17%) or patient transfer (13%). Such inadvertent incidents resulted in reinsertion with another central venous line (69%), agitation due to sedation interruption (47%), development of hemodynamic instability because of interruption of inotrope administration (30%), significant bleeding that required intervention (21%), and no complications (39%). The overall nurses’ compliance to the care bundle checklist improved from 87% to 97% after introduction of the intervention and the number of devices found in place increased. Therefore, the designed care bundle checklist and educational program successfully decreased the accidental removal of critical care devices.


1997 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Pederson ◽  
D Matthies ◽  
S McDonald

BACKGROUND: Although nurses are accountable for pain management, it cannot be assumed that they are well informed about pain. Nurses' knowledge base underlies their pain management; therefore, it is important to measure their knowledge. OBJECTIVE: To measure pediatric critical care nurses' knowledge of pain management. METHOD: A descriptive, exploratory study was done. After a pilot study, an investigator-developed Pain Management Knowledge Test was distributed to 50 pediatric ICU nurses. Test responses were collected anonymously and coded by number. Item analysis was done, and descriptive statistics were calculated. Modified content analysis was used on requests for pain-related information. RESULTS: The test return rate was 38%. The overall mean score was 63%. Mean scores within test subsections varied from 50% to 92%. Other mean scores were 85% on a nine-item scale of drug-action items and 92% on a two-item scale of intervention items. However, no nurse recognized that cognitive-behavioral techniques can inhibit transmission of pain impulses; only 32% indicated that meperidine converts to a toxic metabolite, only 47% recognized nalbuphine as a drug that may cause signs and symptoms of withdrawal if given to a patient who has been receiving an opioid; and only 63% indicated that when a child states that the child has pain, pain exists. Thirteen nurses requested pain-related information, and all requests focused on analgesic medications. CONCLUSIONS: Testing nurses' knowledge of pain indicated gaps that can be addressed through educational interventions. Research is needed in which the test developed for this study is used as both pretest and posttest in an intervention study with pediatric critical care nurses or is modified for use with nurses in other clinical areas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document