A majority of Americans believe that employers should provide health insurance or subsidise the cost of insurance coverage,

2008 ◽  
Vol 545 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-3
Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bethany Doran ◽  
Yu Guo ◽  
Jinfeng Xu ◽  
Sripal Bangalore

Introduction: Under the provisions of the Affordable Care Act, insurance coverage will markedly increase with the Congressional Budgetary Office estimating the number of insured to increase by approximately 13 million in 2014 and 25 million in 2016. However, approximately 31 million non-elderly US citizens are expected to remain without health insurance in 2016. Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains a source of significant morbidity and mortality, as well as cost to society. No prior studies have examined temporal rates of uninsured among patients presenting with an AMI using a nationally representative database. Hypothesis: We tested the hypothesis that the proportion of uninsured individuals with AMI and cost of uninsured to society will vary by year. Methods: We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), which contains estimates from approximately 8 million hospital visits and information related to number of discharges, aggregate charges, and principal diagnoses of all patients discharged in the US. We calculated the percentage of acute myocardial infarction by insurance status, and the sum of all charges of hospital stays in the US adjusted for inflation. Results: The cost to society due to acute myocardial infarction in the uninsured increased substantially from 1997 to 2012, with total cost in 1997 of $852,596,272 and $3,446,893,954 in 2012 after adjustment for inflation. In addition, although rates of AMI decreased in the general population (from 268.6/100,000 individuals in 1997 to 193.8/100,000 individuals in 2012), the proportion of individuals with AMI who were uninsured increased (from 3.83% in 1997 to 7.37% in 2012). Conclusions: The proportion of those experiencing AMI who are uninsured is rising, as is cost to society. It remains to be seen what the effects of expanding health insurance will have on the rate of AMI as well as proportion of AMI represented by the uninsured.


Author(s):  
Beth C. Fuchs

The Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) could be combined with health insurance tax credits to extend coverage to the uninsured. An extended FEHBP, or “E-FEHBP,” would be open to all individuals who were not covered through work or public programs and who also were eligible for the tax credits on the basis of income. E-FEHBP also would be open to employees of very small firms, regardless of their eligibility for tax credits. Most plans available to FEHBP participants would be required to offer enrollment to E-FEHBP participants, although premiums would be rated separately. High-risk individuals would be diverted to a separate high-risk pool, the cost of which would be subsidized by the federal government. E-FEHBP would be administered by the states, or if a state declined, by an entity that contracted with the Office of Personnel Management. While E-FEHBP would provide group insurance to people who otherwise could not get it, premiums could exceed the tax-credit amount and some people still might find the coverage unaffordable.


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis Jacob ◽  
Christian von Vultee ◽  
Karel Kostev

Aims: The goals were to analyze prescription patterns and the cost of antihyperglycemic drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) treated in Germany in 2015. Methods: This study included 36382 patients aged 40 years or over treated in general practices (GPs) and diabetologist practices who were diagnosed with T2DM in 2015. Nine different families of antihyperglycemic therapy were included in the analysis. Demographic data included age, gender, and type of health insurance coverage. Clinical data included HbA1c level, body mass index (BMI), and the number of T2DM complications. The annual antihyperglycemic treatment cost per patient was calculated based on pharmacy retail prices. The multivariate regression analysis was fitted to estimate the adjusted treatment cost differences. Results: The percentage of T2DM patients receiving antihyperglycemic treatments was 87.6. This share was slightly higher in men than in women (89.1% vs 86.0%). Interestingly, the share of people treated with antihyperglycemic drugs decreased with age yet increased with HbA1c levels, BMI, and the number of complications. The average annual cost of antihyperglycemic drugs amounted to €498. It was significantly higher in men than in women (difference of €22). It was also significantly higher in individuals with private health insurance coverage than in people with public health insurance coverage (difference of €153). The annual cost decreased with age. It is compelling to note that this cost increased with HbA1c levels and BMI. Finally, the annual cost also increased with the number of complications. Conclusions: The share and the cost of antihyperglycemic treatments vary with gender, age, type of health insurance coverage, HbA1c levels, BMI, and the number of complications.


Author(s):  
Jonathan Gruber

Losing or leaving a job often means losing health insurance. Of all those who have lost private insurance and become uninsured, one-third have either left or lost a job in the recent past. Continuation of coverage subsidies under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) of 1985 mitigate only slightly this problem due to the high costs of the group coverage that must be purchased. This paper discusses a proposal to build on the successes of COBRA to extend insurance to this important population. The key components are: a doubling of the length of COBRA entitlement to 36 months; eligibility for workers in all firms, not just those with more than 20 employees, but with a waiting period of one to two years; the establishment of a new COBRA-LOAN program that would offer government loans to help enrollees pay the cost of COBRA while they searched for new opportunities; and forgiveness of repayments after the entitlement period for those with low incomes.


Author(s):  
Sara R. Collins Collins ◽  
Cathy Schoen Schoen ◽  
David C. Radley Radley ◽  
Sophie Beutel Beutel

2012 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 498-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin B Hackmann ◽  
Jonathan T Kolstad ◽  
Amanda E Kowalski

We implement an empirical test for selection into health insurance using changes in coverage induced by the introduction of mandated health insurance in Massachusetts. Our test examines changes in the cost of the newly insured relative to those who were insured prior to the reform. We find that counties with larger increases in insurance coverage over the reform period face the smallest increase in average hospital costs for the insured population, consistent with adverse selection into insurance before the reform. Additional results, incorporating cross-state variation and data on health measures, provide further evidence for adverse selection.


2014 ◽  
Vol 104 (5) ◽  
pp. 329-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Maestas ◽  
Kathleen J. Mullen ◽  
Alexander Strand

As health insurance becomes available outside of the employment relationship as a result of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the cost of applying for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI)—potentially going without health insurance coverage during a waiting period totaling 29 months from disability onset —will decline for many people with employer-sponsored health insurance. At the same time, the value of SSDI and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) participation will decline for individuals who otherwise lacked access to health insurance. We study the 2006 Massachusetts health insurance reform to estimate the potential effects of the ACA on SSDI and SSI applications.


Author(s):  
Swarn Chatterjee ◽  
John Gilliam

<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">This research uses the Consumer Expenditure Survey (CEX) data to examine the cost of health insurance coverage for government as well as private sector employees and for the self-employed. The findings show that, when compared with private-sector employees, the self-employed spend more and government employees spend less on health insurance premium payments. Factors such as education, marital status, region of residence, age, family size and educational attainment are significant determinants of the amount spent on health insurance. In addition, the likelihood of participation in Preferred Provider Option (PPO) health plans is lower for government employees and for self-employed individuals than for private sector employees.</span></span></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document