Oxaliplatin versus irinotecan for elderly patients with colon cancer?

2011 ◽  
Vol 643 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-4
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 1089-1099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viola Walter ◽  
Daniel Boakye ◽  
Janick Weberpals ◽  
Lina Jansen ◽  
Walter E. Haefeli ◽  
...  

Background: Chemotherapy underuse in elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with colon cancer has been reported in previous studies. However, these studies were mostly registry-based and limited in their potential to consider underlying reasons of such undertreatment. This study aimed to evaluate patient and hospital determinants of chemotherapeutic treatment in patients with stage III colon cancer, with a particular focus on age and underlying reasons for nontreatment of elderly patients. Methods: A total of 629 patients with stage III colon cancer who were diagnosed in 2003 through 2012 and recruited into a population-based study in the Rhine-Neckar region of Germany were included. Information on sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, comorbidities, and treatment was collected from patient interviews and physicians. Patient (with an emphasis on age) and hospital factors were evaluated for their associations with administration of adjuvant chemotherapy overall and of oxaliplatin specifically using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Administration of chemotherapy decreased from 94% in patients aged 30 to 64 years to 51% in those aged ≥75 years. A very strong decline in chemotherapy use with age persisted even after comprehensive adjustment for multiple patient factors—including comorbidities—and hospital factors and was also seen among patients without any major comorbidities. Between 2005 and 2008, and 2009 and 2012, chemotherapy administration in patients aged ≥75 years decreased from 60% to 41%. Among chemotherapy recipients, old age was also strongly associated with higher odds of nonadministration of oxaliplatin. The 2 most commonly reported reasons for chemotherapy nonreceipt among the study population were patient refusal (30%) and old age (24%). Conclusions: Age was the strongest predictor of chemotherapy underuse, irrespective of comorbidities and even in patients without comorbidities. Such underuse due just to older age in otherwise healthy patients deserves increased attention in clinical practice to ensure that elderly patients also get the best possible care. Patients’ refusal as the most frequent reason for chemotherapy nonreceipt also warrants further investigation to exclude misinformation as underlying cause.


BMC Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Manceau ◽  
Antoine Brouquet ◽  
Pascal Chaibi ◽  
Guillaume Passot ◽  
Olivier Bouché ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Several multicenter randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopy and conventional open surgery for colon cancer have demonstrated that laparoscopic approach achieved the same oncological results while improving significantly early postoperative outcomes. These trials included few elderly patients, with a median age not exceeding 71 years. However, colon cancer is a disease of the elderly. More than 65% of patients operated on for colon cancer belong to this age group, and this proportion may become more pronounced in the coming years. In current practice, laparoscopy is underused in this population. Methods The CELL (Colectomy for cancer in the Elderly by Laparoscopy or Laparotomy) trial is a multicenter, open-label randomized, 2-arm phase III superiority trial. Patients aged 75 years or older with uncomplicated colonic adenocarcinoma or endoscopically unresectable colonic polyp will be randomized to either colectomy by laparoscopy or laparotomy. The primary endpoint of the study is overall postoperative morbidity, defined as any complication classification occurring up to 30 days after surgery. The secondary endpoints are: 30-day and 90-day postoperative mortality, 30-day readmission rate, quality of surgical resection, health-related quality of life and evolution of geriatric assessment. A 35 to 20% overall postoperative morbidity rate reduction is expected for patients operated on by laparoscopy compared with those who underwent surgery by laparotomy. With a two-sided α risk of 5% and a power of 80% (β = 0.20), 276 patients will be required in total. Discussion To date, no dedicated randomized controlled trial has been conducted to evaluate morbidity after colon cancer surgery by laparoscopy or laparotomy in the elderly and the benefits of laparoscopy is still debated in this context. Thus, a prospective multicenter randomized trial evaluating postoperative outcomes specifically in elderly patients operated on for colon cancer by laparoscopy or laparotomy with curative intent is warranted. If significant, such a study might change the current surgical practices and allow a significant improvement in the surgical management of this population, which will be the vast majority of patients treated for colon cancer in the coming years. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03033719 (January 27, 2017).


Cancer ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (4) ◽  
pp. 739-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Supriya S. Patel ◽  
Rebecca Nelson ◽  
Julian Sanchez ◽  
Wendy Lee ◽  
Lori Uyeno ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 621-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masakatsu Numata ◽  
Sho Sawazaki ◽  
Toru Aoyama ◽  
Hiroshi Tamagawa ◽  
Tsutomu Sato ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. e294-e299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel T. Raab ◽  
Aijing Lin ◽  
Grace Clarke Hillyer ◽  
Deborah Keller ◽  
Daniel S. O’Neil ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 1465-1470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masayoshi Tokuoka ◽  
Yoshihito Ide ◽  
Mitsunobu Takeda ◽  
Hajime Hirose ◽  
Yasuji Hashimoto ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3522-3522 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Tournigand ◽  
T. Andre ◽  
j. Bachet ◽  
L. Teixeira ◽  
C. Boni ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document