Appetite Stimulant and Anti-Emetic Effect of Mirtazapine Transdermal Ointment in Cats Affected by Lymphoma Following Chemotherapy Administration: A Multi-Centre Retrospective Study

In humans, mirtazapine can prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and improve cancer patients’ quality of life (QoL). This drug is being increasingly used as an appetite stimulant in cats. The hypothesis of this retrospective study was that mirtazapine could reduce the incidence of CINV and weight loss in feline patients affected by lymphoma. The objectives were to report the use of mirtazapine transdermal ointment and assess the incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity and weight loss in cats diagnosed with lymphoma and receiving chemotherapy. Transdermal mirtazapine was topically administered to the inner surface of the pinna (2 mg/cat/daily) for 14 days following chemotherapy administration. Data recorded from 20 patients were collected. Different grades of GI toxicity were shown in 8/20 (40%) patients. Body weight (BW), body condition score (BCS), and muscle condition score (MCS) improved in 12/20 (60%), 6/20 (30%), and 2/20 (10%) cats, respectively. Mirtazapine-induced adverse events (AEs) occurred in 4/20 (20%) cats and did not require mirtazapine discontinuation. Substantial weight loss was not encountered, suggesting that patients had an adequate food intake after chemotherapy administration. Transdermal mirtazapine ointment was considered safe and well tolerated.

Safety of immediate use of totally implantable venous access ports in adult patients with cancer: a retrospective single-center study

Purpose: Totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAPs) can be used long-term for safe administration of intravenous drugs. TIVAP complications include catheter-related infections, venous thrombosis, extravasation, TIVAP migration, and pain. The relationship between the timing of the first chemotherapy administration after port implantation and complications is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the safety of immediate use of TIVAPs and the associated risk factors for complications.Methods: Between January 2016 and December 2018, 305 patients (median age, 53 years; 256 women) who underwent TIVAP placement at our institution were included. Chemotherapy was administered within 2 days of implantation. A retrospective analysis of patients’ clinical data was performed to investigate catheter days and complications of TIVAPs.Results: Overall, 305 patients were evaluated over 57,324 catheter days (median, 168 catheter days; interquartile range, 105). The median interval between placement and first use of TIVAPs was 0.98 days. The overall morbidity rate was 2.95%. Nine complications occurred in nine patients, including TIVAP-related infection (4), pain (2), port occlusion (1), thrombosis (1), and scar disunion (1), of which five required port removal (1.64%). The median number of catheter days before complications occurred was 61 (range, 10–457 days; interquartile range, 51). No complications occurred within 7 days of implantation. Body mass index was an independent risk factor for TIVAP-related complications in the Cox proportional hazards model (multivariable analysis: hazard ratio, 1.221; 95% confidence interval, 1.054–1.414; P = 0.008).Conclusion: This study suggests the safe long-term use of TIVAPs following their immediate chemotherapy administration within 2 days of implantation.

Decreasing inpatient chemotherapy initiation delays at Memorial Regional Hospital.

225 Background: Between June and December 2019, hematology-oncology patients admitted for elective chemotherapy at Memorial Regional Hospital had a median delay of 10 hours to initiate chemotherapy infusion from time of admission. This contributes to increased cost to the healthcare system and patient dissatisfaction. By September 2020, elective inpatient median time from admission to chemotherapy initiation at Memorial Regional Hospital will be reduced by 20%. Methods: Multidisciplinary team formed to evaluate the time from admission to initiation of chemotherapy for patients who are electively admitted for chemotherapy in 8 Central based on time stamps available in the electronic health records. Patients electively admitted by a non MCI oncologist were excluded. Data collections included time stamp between each process from admission to administration of 1st chemotherapy. Longest time lapse between each process was counted as an occurrence/contributor to delay. Top 80% contributors identified from Pareto chart allowed team to identify countermeasures. Priority Matrix of implementation in PDSA cycle based on highest impact and ease of implementation. Statistical process control chart was developed. Results: (see table). Conclusions: PDSA Cycle 1, obtaining labs 24-48 hours prior to admission, resulted in a 10% reduction in chemotherapy initiation time. PDSA Cycle 2, enhancing “ok to treat” communication, resulted in a further reduction of time to treatment. The combination of PDSA Cycle 1 & 2 resulted in a 40% reduction in time to chemotherapy initiation, exceeding the planned aim of 20%. Balance measures reflected no reduction in the mean number of overnight stays between baseline and PDSA Cycle 2 (4 nights) that could contribute to a decreased cost. Results and recommendations to adopt at all inpatient oncology departments within the healthcare system will be presented to leadership for support. Data automation through collaborative efforts with information technology is in process to assist with continuous monitoring. Future state, the quality improvement tools gained from ASCO QTP will be utilized to evaluate and improve workflow issues in the outpatient oncology setting. Nationally recognized organizations are encouraged to propose a benchmark for admission time to first chemotherapy administration based on the evaluation of current available data. Additional studies are needed to evaluate chemotherapy treatment delays in other settings.[Table: see text]

Feasibility of tele-chemotherapy administration to improve access to rural cancer patients.

112 Background: Telehealth improves access to cancer care for patients with cancer in rural communities. It allows qualified infusion nurses to administer chemotherapy in smaller rural towns under supervision by health professionals from larger tertiary sites. Here we would like to share our institutional experience in tele-chemotherapy administration to patients in rural Utah. Methods: We collected patient data including treatment regimens administered at our tele health sites from March 2019 to February 2021. Results: A total of 133 unique patients received 1073 cycles of low to intermediate risk treatment regimens. 42 unique regimens including intravenous and oral chemotherapy drugs, immune therapy and targeted drugs were administered at four rural facilities including Cassia Regional Center, Sanpete Valley Hospital, Severe Valley Hospital and Heber Valley Hospital in Utah. 52 physicians located at tertiary sites were involved in tele-chemotherapy administration. In addition to Medicare, Medicaid, the tele chemotherapy was covered by four commercial payers including Blue Cross Blue Shield, Select Health, Tricare and United Healthcare. Conclusions: Tele chemotherapy administration is feasible and allows improved access to cancer patients in rural communities. We aim to expand current project to capture the patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes including treatment delays, dose modifications, infusion reactions, hospitalizations or emergency visits.

Variable implementation of optimal therapeutic strategies in metastatic colorectal cancer: Reviewing rates of liver resection and triplet chemotherapy across Australian hospitals as potential quality indicators.

248 Background: Quality indicators (QI) are essential to monitor the efficacy of cancer care and to guide quality improvement, however many are derived from ‘expert consensus’ and are not validated against outcomes. Moreover, the majority of oncological QI are defined in the surgical setting, with only a paucity of QI for the treatment of metastatic disease. We aimed to define and validate novel QI for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) based on therapeutic approaches associated with a proven survival benefit. Methods: Data was analysed from TRACC, a multisite Australian registry collecting prospective demographic, tumour, treatment and outcome data for mCRC. We identified all patients diagnosed across 11 hospitals and explored variation by site with regards to patient and tumour characteristics, first-line chemotherapy administration and resection of oligometastatic disease. Log-rank testing and Kaplan-Meier curves compare overall survival (OS) between sites, and Pearson correlation was used to assess associations with each QI. Results: We examined data from 3132 patients diagnosed with mCRC between July 2009 – April 2021. Median age was 66 years (range 62 – 71 years by site), ECOG 0-1 81% (range 69 – 96% by site), and Charlson Comorbidity Index ≤2 43% (33 – 59% by site). Multivariate analysis confirmed association of known adverse prognostic factors with inferior OS (poor ECOG, right sided primary, KRAS or BRAF mutation, all p <0.05). Median OS for entire cohort was 26.2 months (95%CI 24.9 – 27.3 months), and varied by hospital site from 20.1 – 36.1 months (p<0.001). Of the QI evaluated, rate of triplet chemotherapy (FOLFOXIRI) administration (2.8 – 13.2% by site) was very strongly correlated with OS (R2 = 0.851), rate of liver resection (9.8 – 23.2% by site) was moderately correlated (R2 = 0.523), and rates of active treatment with first-line chemotherapy (63 - 90% by site) were weakly correlated (R2 = 0.209). Other proposed QI such as rates of lung metastases resection or chemotherapy administration in the elderly showed significant variation by site, but did not correlate with survival. Conclusions: There is significant variation in OS for patients with mCRC in these Australian hospitals, with major differences in treatment approaches. Treatment strategies known to improve survival outcomes, such as triplet FOLFOXIRI chemotherapy and resection of liver metastases, may be potential QI to benchmark and track quality improvement over time. Further analysis will determine the impact of baseline patient populations between sites, and to correlate these QI with other quality measures.

Evaluation of febrile neutropenia and myelosuppression in patients receiving FOLFOX/FOLFIRI in gastrointestinal cancer treated with same-day (SD) pegfilgrastim/pegfilgrastim-CBQV (PFG).

311 Background: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines and the manufacturers of PFG recommend administration at least 24 hours after chemotherapy (CTX). Administering SD PFG carries the potential risk for exacerbation of neutropenia based on analyses in lymphoma and breast cancer regimens; however, little data exists on infusional fluorouracil and SD PFG administration. The availability of biosimilar PFG and increased utilization of growth factors during the COVID-19 pandemic has led to changes in practice for SD PFG administration. This study explored the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) and myelosuppression with FOLFOX and FOLFIRI regimens in Gastrointestinal malignancies (GI) to address the safety of SD utilization of PFG. Methods: Patient data was extracted through electronic health records search of ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for GI malignancies and treated with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI-based regimens from November 2013 to May 2021. SD administration was defined as administration of PFG within 15 minutes after fluorouracil pump disconnect. The primary endpoint of our study was to evaluate the incidence of FN across all CTX cycles for up to four cycles, in SD PFG administration. Secondary outcomes included chemotherapy induced neutropenia (CIN), hospitalizations, and CTX dose reduction or delay. Results: Three hundred and thirty-nine patient charts were reviewed with 55 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. In our study cohort, 72.7% received FOLFOX and 27.2% received FOLFIRI-based regimens. Out of all 194 CTX cycles, 136 (70.1%) cycles received pegfilgrastim and 58 cycles received pegfilgrastim-cbqv (29.9%). Two patients had grade 3/4 CIN (1%), with both cases resulting in FN (1%). Both FN cases resulted in hospitalizations, and dose delays or reductions. Investigation of FN incidences revealed that both patients received CTX with active infections, one case with a urinary tract infection and the other with a chronic gangrene infection. Conclusions: Our study results suggest that SD administration of PFG can be as a safe and effective alternative to 24-hour post-chemotherapy administration in patients receiving FOLFOX or FOLFIRI-based regimens. The incidence of FN was noted to be minimal in our study. Furthermore, no noted increase in myelosuppression was seen in our analysis, as compared to previous studies in breast cancer and lymphoma-based regimens. SD administration not only minimizes travel burdens on long-distance patients but also has allowed for reduction in infusion appointments and therefore possible exposure to the SARS-COV2 virus during the 2020-2021 pandemic. Future prospective studies are warranted in order to elucidate the risk of FN and myelosuppression in patients undergoing chemotherapy for GI malignancies with SD PFG administration.

Inpatient chemotherapy for patients with advanced solid tumors: A single-center observational study.

158 Background: We sought to identify a population of patients with advanced-stage solid tumor diagnoses for whom inpatient chemotherapy is appropriate. In so doing, we endeavor to define standards of practice in addressing prognostic awareness and goals of therapy prior to treatment. Methods: We identified 124 patients with Stage IV solid tumors who were given at least one dose of inpatient chemotherapy in 2019. We performed manual chart review to collect information on patient demographics, details of cancer diagnosis and chemotherapy regimen, and dates of admission, chemotherapy administration, discharge, readmission, and death. Results: Ninety-four percent of patients studied were admitted for cancer-related reasons. The 30-day mortality for patients with Stage IV cancer given inpatient chemotherapy was 20.2%, including 12 patients (9.7%) who died during the same admission. The 30-day readmission rate was 40.2%. Median overall survival and readmission-free survival were both 15 days (range, 3-510 and 3-642, respectively). Among patients who died within 30 days, 18.2% (4/22) had a serious illness conversation documented prior to chemotherapy administration. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that there is a high mortality and readmission rate among patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies who receive inpatient chemotherapy. Standardizing the expectation of informed consent and/or goals of care discussion prior to treatment is necessary. This may prevent administration of futile chemotherapy to patients requiring hospitalization for advanced cancer.

A Natural History Study of Nitrous Oxide versus Propofol-Assisted Intrathecal Therapy in the Treatment of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Background: Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treatment requires numerous lumbar punctures (LPs) with intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy to prevent and treat central nervous system disease. Historically, LPs in this setting are performed using propofol sedation. At our institution, LPs are often alternatively performed under nitrous oxide (N2O). To date, there have been no large scale assessments comparing these sedation methods for this purpose. Procedures: Retrospective cohort study of patients aged 0-31 years with ALL treated between 1/1/2013-12/31/2018 at the Children’s Minnesota Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, including all therapeutic LPs performed in the clinic setting under either propofol or N2O. Results: Among 215 patients and 2677 therapeutic LPs, 56.6% (n = 1515) occurred under N2O with 43.3% (n = 93) of patients using exclusively N2O with all LPs. The incidence of traumatic LPs (RBC ≥ 10 cells/µL) were similar between both treatments (27.3% vs 30.2). Successful IT chemotherapy delivery (99.7% N2O vs 99.8% propofol) did not differ between sedation types. Experiencing a traumatic LP under N2O was associated with a sedation switch for the subsequent LP (aOR 2.40, p=0.002) while older age (aOR 1.08, p<0.0001) and higher BMI percentile (aOR 1.01, p=0.009) were associated with increased likelihood for undergoing a traumatic LP. Conclusion: N2O is an effective sedation option for therapeutic LPs in children with ALL with noninferiority to propofol in terms of IT chemotherapy administration and traumatic LP incidence. For many patients, N2O can effectively replace propofol during LP procedures, which has important safety and quality-of-life implications.