Application to Rivers and Underground Waters

1982 ◽  
Vol 14 (9-11) ◽  
pp. 1073-1094
Author(s):  
J. L. Marivoet ◽  
F. De Smedt ◽  
A. Van der Beken ◽  
J. Dirickx ◽  
W. Van Craenenbroeck

Mathematical models describing the water quality in rivers and groundwaters are derived from the mass balances. For rivers, a one dimensional transport equation is derived. Different methods of parameter estimation are considered and more recent techniques are introduced. For the application of water quality models to river management, two groups of models are considered : the simulation models and the optimization models. As a case study, the Bedford Ouse quality models are described. Practical and theoretical applications in the United Kingdom, Canada, Federal Republic of Germany, U.S.A. and Belgium are discussed. For groundwaters, several applications of water quality transport models are discussed and the use in groundwater management is explained.

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liancong Luo ◽  
David Hamilton ◽  
Jia Lan ◽  
Chris McBride ◽  
Dennis Trolle

Abstract. Automated calibration of complex deterministic water quality models with a large number of biogeochemical parameters can reduce time-consuming iterative simulations involving empirical judgements of model fit. We undertook auto-calibration of the one-dimensional hydrodynamic-ecological lake model DYRESM-CAEDYM, using a Monte Carlo Sampling (MCS) method, in order to test the applicability of this procedure for shallow, polymictic Lake Rotorua (New Zealand). The calibration procedure involved independently minimising the root-mean-square-error (RMSE), maximizing the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and Nash-Sutcliffe efficient coefficient (Nr) for comparisons of model state variables against measured data. An assigned number of parameter permutations was used for 10,000 simulation iterations. The optimal temperature calibration produced a RMSE of 0.54 °C, Nr-value of 0.99 and r-value of 0.98 through the whole water column based on comparisons with 540 observed water temperatures collected between 13 July 2007–13 January 2009. The modeled bottom dissolved oxygen concentration (20.5 m below surface) was compared with 467 available observations. The calculated RMSE of the simulations compared with the measurements was 1.78 mg L−1, the Nr-value was 0.75 and the r-value was 0.87. The autocalibrated model was further tested for an independent data set by simulating bottom-water hypoxia events for the period 15 January 2009 to 8 June 2011 (875 days). This verification produced an accurate simulation of five hypoxic events corresponding to DO < 2 mg L−1 during summer of 2009–2011. The RMSE was 2.07 mg L−1, Nr-value 0.62 and r-value of 0.81, based on the available data set of 738 days. The auto-calibration software of DYRESM-CAEDYM developed here is substantially less time-consuming and more efficient in parameter optimisation than traditional manual calibration which has been the standard tool practiced for similar complex water quality models.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 903-913 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liancong Luo ◽  
David Hamilton ◽  
Jia Lan ◽  
Chris McBride ◽  
Dennis Trolle

Abstract. Automated calibration of complex deterministic water quality models with a large number of biogeochemical parameters can reduce time-consuming iterative simulations involving empirical judgements of model fit. We undertook autocalibration of the one-dimensional hydrodynamic-ecological lake model DYRESM-CAEDYM, using a Monte Carlo sampling (MCS) method, in order to test the applicability of this procedure for shallow, polymictic Lake Rotorua (New Zealand). The calibration procedure involved independently minimizing the root-mean-square error (RMSE), maximizing the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and Nash–Sutcliffe efficient coefficient (Nr) for comparisons of model state variables against measured data. An assigned number of parameter permutations was used for 10 000 simulation iterations. The “optimal” temperature calibration produced a RMSE of 0.54 ∘C, Nr value of 0.99, and r value of 0.98 through the whole water column based on comparisons with 540 observed water temperatures collected between 13 July 2007 and 13 January 2009. The modeled bottom dissolved oxygen concentration (20.5 m below surface) was compared with 467 available observations. The calculated RMSE of the simulations compared with the measurements was 1.78 mg L−1, the Nr value was 0.75, and the r value was 0.87. The autocalibrated model was further tested for an independent data set by simulating bottom-water hypoxia events from 15 January 2009 to 8 June 2011 (875 days). This verification produced an accurate simulation of five hypoxic events corresponding to DO < 2 mg L−1 during summer of 2009–2011. The RMSE was 2.07 mg L−1, Nr value 0.62, and r value of 0.81, based on the available data set of 738 days. The autocalibration software of DYRESM-CAEDYM developed here is substantially less time-consuming and more efficient in parameter optimization than traditional manual calibration which has been the standard tool practiced for similar complex water quality models.


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (0) ◽  
pp. 9781780408323-9781780408323
Author(s):  
D. L. Clark ◽  
G. Hunt ◽  
M. S. Kasch ◽  
P. J. Lemonds

1987 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 1197-1202 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Van Der Beken

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 88
Author(s):  
Xiamei Man ◽  
Chengwang Lei ◽  
Cayelan C. Carey ◽  
John C. Little

Many researchers use one-dimensional (1-D) and three-dimensional (3-D) coupled hydrodynamic and water-quality models to simulate water quality dynamics, but direct comparison of their relative performance is rare. Such comparisons may quantify their relative advantages, which can inform best practices. In this study, we compare two 1-year simulations in a shallow, eutrophic, managed reservoir using a community-developed 1-D model and a 3-D model coupled with the same water-quality model library based on multiple evaluation criteria. In addition, a verified bubble plume model is coupled with the 1-D and 3-D models to simulate the water temperature in four epilimnion mixing periods to further quantify the relative performance of the 1-D and 3-D models. Based on the present investigation, adopting a 1-D water-quality model to calibrate a 3-D model is time-efficient and can produce reasonable results; 3-D models are recommended for simulating thermal stratification and management interventions, whereas 1-D models may be more appropriate for simpler model setups, especially if field data needed for 3-D modeling are lacking.


2012 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 1241-1247 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. N. Moriasi ◽  
B. N. Wilson ◽  
K. R. Douglas-Mankin ◽  
J. G. Arnold ◽  
P. H. Gowda

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 04018057 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yogesh Khare ◽  
Christopher J. Martinez ◽  
Rafael Muñoz-Carpena ◽  
Adelbert “Del” Bottcher ◽  
Andrew James

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document