scholarly journals Right-sided Aortic Arch Associated with Congenital Heart Disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (14) ◽  
pp. 1779-1780
Author(s):  
Yoh Arita ◽  
Kenji Tanaka ◽  
Katsukiyo Kitabayashi ◽  
Shinji Hasegawa
2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (01) ◽  
pp. 69-76
Author(s):  
Oliver Graupner ◽  
Jessica Koch ◽  
Christian Enzensberger ◽  
Malena Götte ◽  
Aline Wolter ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Altered cerebral hemodynamics are involved in changes in head biometry in fetuses with congenital heart disease (CHD). We compared head growth in different CHD groups with published normative values and investigated whether CHD groups differ from each other in terms of head circumference (HC) development over gestational age (GA). Materials and Methods Retrospective cohort study consisting of 248 CHD fetuses. Subgroups were generated according to the expected ascending aorta oxygen saturation: Low placental blood content (BC) and therefore low oxygen delivery to the brain (group 1: n = 108), intermediate placental and systemic BC due to intracardiac mixing of blood (group 2: n = 103), high placental BC (group 3: n = 13) and low placental BC and low oxygen delivery to the brain without mixing of blood (group 4: n = 24). Furthermore, group 1 was divided into antegrade (n = 34) and retrograde (n = 74) flow through the aortic arch. Comparisons were made at a GA of 22, 30 and 38 weeks. Results Estimated values of zHC (z-score transformed) were not significantly different between the four CHD groups at the three time points in gestation (all p > 0.05). Within group 1 fetuses with retrograde aortic arch flow showed a significant negative association between HC and GA compared to reference values (b = –0.054, p < 0.001) and had significantly lower zHC values at 38 weeks (–0.836) compared to fetuses with antegrade flow (0.366, p = 0.009). Conclusion Our data do not confirm that CHD fetuses in general have a significantly smaller HC. HC becomes smaller throughout gestation depending on the direction of aortic arch flow.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 1538-1543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel C Lombardo ◽  
Aleksey Porollo ◽  
James F Cnota ◽  
Robert J Hopkin

1970 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-104
Author(s):  
A Shariar ◽  
MA Huq ◽  
NU Zakia ◽  
M Salim ◽  
SA Islam

Interrupted Aortic Arch (lAA) is the absence or discontinuation of a portion of the aortic arch. There are three types of Interrupted Aortic Arch,and they are classified according to the site of the interruption. lsolated IAA appears commonly in type B lAA,where the interruption occurs between the left carotid artery and the left subclavian artery.In such case there is no associated cardiac anomaly and the patient may not exhibit lethal form of presentation unless there is duct dependent circulation or ventricular septal defect. lsolated interrupted arch is relatively rare congenital anomaly and very few cases were reported in literature so far. Keywords: lnterrupted aortic arch; Complex congenital heart disease. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/cardio.v4i1.9400 Cardiovasc. J. 2011; 4(1): 102-104


1994 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-167
Author(s):  
Rajiv Verma ◽  
Delores Danilowicz ◽  
Stephen Colvin

AbstractCoarctations of the aortic arch are rare, and when found, they are often associated with other complex congenital heart disease. An adolescent female with multiple coarctations of the aortic arch and ventricular septal defects underwent complete repair, entailing replacement of the aortic arch with a homograft and closure of the ventricular septal defects. The postoperative course was complicated by a tear in the homograft, possibly related to sepsis. After its resolution, her hemodynamic results remain excellent.


2009 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 1048-1053 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriko Watanabe ◽  
Yasunobu Hayabuchi ◽  
Miki Inoue ◽  
Miho Sakata ◽  
Manal Mohamed Helmy Nabo ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hussein Soleimantabar ◽  
Sofia Sabouri ◽  
Leila Khedmat ◽  
Samira Salajeghe ◽  
Behzad Memari ◽  
...  

The objective of this study was to examine the findings of computed tomographic (CT) angiography in patients with aortic arch anomalies in comparison with transthoracic echocardiography findings who referred to a private imaging center in Tehran during 2009-2012. The cases included 203 patients with clinical symptoms or echocardiogram of congenital heart disease to assess the presence of aortic arch anomalies among patients referred to imaging center. This study is a retrospective study based on the CT angiographic findings in comparison with transthoracic echocardiography findings of chest among patients with aortic arch anomalies. In this study, 203 patients with congenital anomalies were enrolled in the study, among those, 107 patients were men and 96 were female. The most common anomaly of the aortic arch was found to be coarctation (19.7%), followed by right sided arch with mirror image branching (19.2%). Furthermore, the most common cardiac anomalies associated with aortic arch anomalies were VSD, PA and PDA. The sensitivity and specificity of transthoracic echocardiography in the diagnosis of aortic arch anomalies was 59% and 100% in comparison with CT angiography. In addition, the agreement between the two methods (kappa) in the diagnosis of aortic arch anomalies was 0.72. But, transthoracic echocardiography is the first diagnostic method for patients with congenital heart disease. In some patients, the ability of this method was limited to the detection of coronary artery anomalies and thoracic vessels. Therefore, CT is used for morphological evaluation of congenital heart disease (CHD) due to its main advantages including fast acquisition time, large anatomical coverage, high speed, and great spatial resolution. Moreover, CT is essential for proper evaluation of CHD regarding its high spatial and temporal resolution.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document