Usefulness of Rapid Desensitization Therapy for Severe Rash Caused by Molecularly Targeted Drugs Used in the Treatment of Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

18183 Background: Erlotinib is an orally available selective HER1/EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. In the BR.21 trial, erlotinib significantly improved survival and quality of life in non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) patients (pts). The study evaluated the initial efficacy and safety of erlotinib in previously treated advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients in Shanghai, China. Methods: Eligibility criteria included stage IIIb/IV or recurrent NSCLC pts who failed from prior chemotherapy, PS = 0–2, weight loss less than 5%, and no urgent symptoms. Pts received oral erlotinib 150 mg po/day until objective or symptomatic progression. Results: 50 pts were enrolled from Oct 1 to Sept 30. Demographics: M 68%/F 32%; median age 55 y [range 28–68]; stage IV 86%; PS 0/1/2:2 (4%)/44 (88%)/4 (8%); adenocarcinoma/non-adenocarcinoma 39 (78%)/11 (22%); smoking status: 26 (52%) /no 24 (48%). The major toxicity was rash: 48 (96%), 10 (20%) of them are grade 3/4; other toxicity included grade 1/2 diahhrea: 5 (10%); grade 1/2 liver dysfunction: 4 (8%); grade 2 leucocytopenia: 2 (4%); grade 1 thrombocytopenia: 1(2%); fatigue and dyspnea. 3 patients discontinued for dyspnea, pneumonitis and fatigue respectively. No pts had pulmonary fibrosis and dose reduction. 47 pts were followed long enough for efficacy evaluation, which indentified 18 (38%) with PR, 21 (45%) with SD, 8 (17%) with PD. Subgroup analysis showed the resposes to erlotinib have no relation with gender, age, smoking status, performance status, histology and stages, however, significant difference existed in the subgroup patients with severe rash and less symptoms such as dyspnea and fatigue ( Table 1 ). Conclusions: Erlotinib is active and well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC failed to previously chemotherapy. Preliminary results suggest patients with severe rash, less dyspnea and fatigue are accociated with better response. The study in ongoing. Table 1 Response of erlotinib in advanced treated NSCLC pts. * P values less than 0.05. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

Correlation of gefitinib and its metabolites with gefitinib induced rash in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e21712 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e21712-e21712

Author(s):

Shaoxing Guan ◽

Xi Chen ◽

Min Huang ◽

Li Zhang ◽

Xueding Wang

Keyword(s):

Lung Cancer ◽

Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽

Cell Lung Cancer ◽

Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽

Small Cell ◽

Therapeutic Drug ◽

Small Cell Lung ◽

Cutoff Values ◽

Nsclc Patients ◽

Severe Rash

e21712 Background: Gefitinib induced rash is the most common adverse reaction and severe rash of gefitinib often leads to discontinuation or termination of treatment. The concentrations of drug and its metabolites may affect drug induced toxicities, however, the association of gefitinib/metabolites with gefitinib-induced rash are poorly investigated. Therefore, we explored the association between concentrations of gefitinib and its four metabolites with gefitinib-induced rash in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods: A total of 180 advanced NSCLC patients carrying EGFR sensitive mutations receiving gefitinib were enrolled. The concentrations of gefitinib, and its four metabolites including M537194, M387783, M523595 and M605211 were determined by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). The associations between concentration of gefitinib/its metabolites and gefitinib-induced rash were analyzed by Mann-Whiney U test. Operating characteristic curves(ROC) were used to determine gefitinib/metabolites cutoff values for gefitinib-induced rash. Results: M605211 was first detected in plasma in NSCLC patients. The concentrations of gefitinib and M605211, M537194 were found to be correlated with the incidence of gefitinib-induced rash ( P= 0.0002, 0.027 and 0.0097, respectively), moreover, the concentration of gefitinib was correlated with severe rash (Grade 0,1 vs. 2+, P= 0.017). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that only gefitinib concentration was independent risk factor for gefitinib-induced rash (grade 0 vs grade1+, OR = 1.006, 95%CI (1.002-1.009), P = 0.00078; grade0,1 vs grade2+, OR = 1.003, 95%CI (1.001-1.005), P = 0.015, respectively). The cutoff values of gefitinib were 160.2 ng/ml (grade 0 vs grade1+, sensitivity = 78.7%, specificity = 47.7%, area under the curve (AUC) = 0.686, P = 0.0002, 95% CI (0.592-0.779)) and 201.7ng/ml (grade0,1 vs grade2+, sensitivity = 69.3%, specificity = 47.6%, AUC = 0.605, P = 0.0168, 95%CI (0.521-0.689)). Conclusions: This research demonstrated that the concentration of gefitinib and its metabolites were associated with gefitinib induced rash in NSCLC patients. Therapeutic drug monitoring of gefitinib concentration may have potential improvement for optimization of treatment with gefitinib. Clinical trial information: NCT01994057.

Download Full-text