scholarly journals Natural Gas Sweetening, Amine Process Acid Gas Removal

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy J Skone
ACS Omega ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nasrin Salimi Darani ◽  
Reza Mosayebi Behbahani ◽  
Yasaman Shahebrahimi ◽  
Afshin Asadi ◽  
Amir H. Mohammadi

2021 ◽  
Vol 627 ◽  
pp. 119201
Author(s):  
Yang Liu ◽  
Zhijie Chen ◽  
Wulin Qiu ◽  
Gongping Liu ◽  
Mohamed Eddaoudi ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Yansen Hartanto ◽  
Tri Partono Adhi ◽  
Antonius Indarto

Acid gas removal to remove carbon dioxide (CO2) in natural gas is one of the most important processes. The common removal process of CO2 from natural gas by using alkanolamine solution This process was adopted as basic module in commercial process simulation tools with various equilibrium models. Thus, this study was focused to evaluate the validity in certain operating condition and equilibrium model that produced by commercial simulation tools. The model in this study included coefficient activity model based on Kent-Eisenberg, Li-Mather, and Electrolyte Non Random Two Liquid (NRTL). The evaluation was conducted by doing analysis from simulation result and experiment data that have been used as reference. Furthermore, validation test in absorption process simulation was done to compare column temperature profile. The overall conclusions show that electrolyte NRTL gives the most accurate result.


Membranes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunhan Chu ◽  
Xuezhong He

Natural gas sweetening is required to remove the acid gas CO2 to meet gas grid specifications. Membrane technology has a great potential in this application compared to the state-of-the-art amine absorption technology. Carbon membranes are of particular interest due to their high CO2/CH4 selectivity of over 100. In order to document the advantages of carbon membranes for natural gas (NG) sweetening, HYSYS simulation and cost evaluation were conducted in this work. A two-stage carbon membrane process with recycling in the second stage was found to be technically feasible to achieve >98% CH4 with <2% CH4 loss. The specific natural gas processing cost of 1.122 × 10−2 $/m3 sweet NG was estimated at a feed pressure of 90 bar, which was significantly dependent on the capital-related cost. Future work on improving carbon membrane performance is required to increase the competitiveness of carbon membranes for natural gas sweetening.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document