scholarly journals Fischer-Tropsch and Conventional Jet Fuel Blending

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy J Skone
Fuel ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 300 ◽  
pp. 121008
Author(s):  
Sundaramurthy Vedachalam ◽  
Philip Boahene ◽  
Ajay K. Dalai

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 3528-3536
Author(s):  
Meng Yang ◽  
Lingjun Zhu ◽  
Yexin Zhuo ◽  
Jiacheng Liang ◽  
Shurong Wang

Y3+, exchanged with the H protons in zeolites, decreased the acid strength of Co/Y-β-x (x = 1, 2, 3, 4) catalysts, which reduced the selectivity of gaseous hydrocarbons (C1–C4) and promoted the generation of JFRHs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 279 ◽  
pp. 115841
Author(s):  
Thomas G. Kreutz ◽  
Eric D. Larson ◽  
Cristina Elsido ◽  
Emanuele Martelli ◽  
Chris Greig ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Fredrik Hermann ◽  
Jens Klingmann ◽  
Rolf Gabrielsson ◽  
Jo¨rgen R. Pedersen ◽  
Jim O. Olsson ◽  
...  

A comparative experimental investigation has been performed, comparing the emissions from a synthetic jet fuel and from Jet A1. In the investigation, the unburned hydrocarbons were analyzed chemically and the regulated emissions of NOx, CO and HC were measured. All combustion tests were performed under elevated pressures in a gas turbine combustor rig. A Swedish company, Oroboros AB, has developed a novel clean synthetic jet fuel, LeanJet®. The fuel is produced synthetically from synthesis gas by a Fischer-Tropsch process. Except for the density, the fuel conforms to the Standard Specification for Aviation Turbine Fuels. The low density is due to the lack of aromatics and polyaromatics. Organic emissions from the gas turbine combustor rig were collected by adsorption sampling and analyzed chemically. Both the fuels and the organic emissions were analyzed by gas chromatography/flame ionization (GC/FID) complemented with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Under the operating conditions investigated, no significant differences were found for the regulated emissions, except for emission of CO from the synthetic fuel, which, at leaner conditions, was one-quarter of that measured for Jet A1. Detailed analysis of the organic compounds showed that the emissions from both fuels were dominated by fuel alkanes and a significant amount of naphthalene. It was also found that Jet A1 produced a much higher amount of benzene than the synthetic fuel.


2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 2615-2626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin Corporan ◽  
Matthew J. DeWitt ◽  
Vincent Belovich ◽  
Robert Pawlik ◽  
Amy C. Lynch ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Craig R. Davison ◽  
Wajid A. Chishty

To enhance energy security and reduce the environmental impact of aviation, alternate fuels derived from various non-petroleum based sources are being developed. Currently alternate fuels are produced to match the properties of existing jet fuels allowing the new fuels to be used in current fleets concurrently with traditional jet fuel. The alternate fuels must, therefore, perform as well as the traditional fuels through the entire operating envelope. This paper provides the results of performance testing in an altitude chamber up to 11,300 m (35,000 feet) with a simulated forward speed up to Mach 0.75. The test engine was an instrumented 1.15 kN thrust turbojet burning conventional Jet A-1 as a baseline; a semi-synthetic blend of camelina based hydro processed renewable jet and JP8; a blend of 50% Fischer-Tropsch synthetic paraffinic kerosene and 50% JP8; and a 100% Fischer-Tropsch synthetic paraffinic kerosene. Both steady state and transient performance are presented. The theoretical effect of the alternate fuels for a simple idealized Brayton cycle is also presented. The work was conducted as part of on-going efforts by departments within the Government of Canada to systematically assess alternative aviation fuels.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document