scholarly journals Guidelines for IAEA Small Specimen Test Techniques Master Curve Fracture Toughness Testing

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiang Chen ◽  
Rebeca Hernandez Pascual ◽  
Marta Serrano ◽  
David Andres ◽  
Henk Nolles ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Xiang Chen ◽  
Mikhail A. Sokolov ◽  
Arunodaya Bhattacharya ◽  
Logan N. Clowers ◽  
Tim Graening ◽  
...  

Abstract In this study, we performed fracture toughness testing of ten Eurofer97 steel variants using precracked miniature multi-notch bend bar (M4CVN) specimens based on the Master Curve method in the ASTM E1921 standard. Additional Vickers microhardness and room temperature tensile testing complemented the fracture toughness testing. Compared with standard Eurofer97, the ten variants didn’t show a comprehensive improvement of mechanical properties. The Master Curve method was found to yield a reasonable prediction of fracture toughness results obtained from M4CVN specimens with most valid fracture toughness data within the 2% and 98% tolerance boundaries of the Master Curve. The three-parameter Weibull distribution with Weibull exponent b = 4 also yielded excellent prediction of the relationship between fracture toughness results KJc and the cumulative probability for failure pf for one steel variant.


Author(s):  
Vitor Scarabeli Barbosa ◽  
Claudio Ruggieri

This work addresses an experimental investigation on the cleavage fracture behavior of a high strength, low alloy structural steel using non-standard PCVN specimens. The primary purpose is to investigate the effects of increased specimen span on experimentally measured fracture toughness values and implications for the characterization of the temperature dependence of toughness based on the Master Curve methodology. Fracture toughness testing conducted on various PCVN geometries with increased specimen span extracted from an A572 Grade 50 steel plate provides the cleavage fracture resistance data in terms of the J-integral at cleavage instability, Jc. The experimental results show a potential effect of specimen span on Jc-values which can help mitigating the effects of constraint loss often observed in smaller fracture specimens. An exploratory application to determine the reference temperature, T0, derived from the Master Curve methodology also provides additional support for using non-standard bend specimens in routine fracture applications.


Author(s):  
Sergio Limon ◽  
Peter Martin ◽  
Mike Barnum ◽  
Robert Pilarczyk

The fracture process of energy pipelines can be described in terms of fracture initiation, stable fracture propagation and final fracture or fracture arrest. Each of these stages, and the final fracture mode (leak or rupture), are directly impacted by the tendency towards brittle or ductile behavior that line pipe steels have the capacity to exhibit. Vintage and modern low carbon steels, such as those used to manufacture energy pipelines, exhibit a temperature-dependent transition from ductile-to-brittle behavior that affects the fracture behavior. There are numerous definitions of fracture toughness in common usage, depending on the stage of the fracture process and the behavior or fracture mode being evaluated. The most commonly used definitions in engineering fracture analysis of pipelines with cracks or long-seam weld defects are related to fracture initiation, stable propagation or final fracture. When choosing fracture toughness test data for use in engineering Fracture Mechanics-based assessments of energy pipelines, it is important to identify the stage of the fracture process and the expected fracture behavior in order to appropriately select test data that represent equivalent conditions. A mismatch between the physical fracture event being modeled and the chosen experimental fracture toughness data can result in unreliable predictions or overly conservative results. This paper presents a description of the physical fracture process, behavior and failure modes that pipelines commonly exhibit as they relate to fracture toughness testing, and their implications when evaluating cracks and cracks-like features in pipelines. Because pipeline operators, and practitioners of engineering Fracture Mechanics analyses, are often faced with the challenge of only having Charpy fracture toughness available, this paper also presents a review of the various correlations of Charpy toughness data to fracture toughness data expressed in terms of KIC or JIC. Considerations with the selection of an appropriate correlation for determining the failure pressure of pipelines in the presence of cracks and long-seam weld anomalies will be discussed.


1988 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 698-702
Author(s):  
I. D. Abushenkov ◽  
A. I. Alekseev ◽  
V. Ya. Il'ichev ◽  
N. I. Mokryi ◽  
A. I. Telegon ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document