scholarly journals Adsorption and desorption of sulfur dioxide on novel adsorbents for flue gas desulfurization. Final report, September 1, 1994--February 29, 1996

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y.S. Lin ◽  
S.G. Deng
1976 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Aul, Jr ◽  
R Delleney ◽  
G Brown ◽  
G Page ◽  
D Stuebner

Author(s):  
Shengyu Liu ◽  
Wende Xiao

A new wet FGD process in which sulfur dioxide was absorbed in the bubble reactor using granular limestone simultaneously adding acetic acid had been proposed. The main difference compared to conventional wet FGD process was the ability of the new process to utilize granular limestone directly as a desulphurization reagent simultaneously adding acetic acid. Thus, the pulverizing of limestone, which causes power consumption, can be saved. Only using granular limestone directly as absorbent without acetic acid, SO2 removal efficiency and limestone utilization were too low. Adding some concentration of acetic acid, the performance of the new wet FGD process was confirmed to be equal to or higher than that of a conventional process in various tests. Various parameters of the new FGD process which would affect the sulfur dioxide removal efficiency and limestone utilization were studied.


2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence Koech ◽  
Ray Everson ◽  
Hein Neomagus ◽  
Hilary Rutto

AbstractFlue gas desulfurization (FGD) technology has been adopted by a number of power stations for the removal of sulfur dioxide (SO


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document