scholarly journals Adsorption and desorption of sulfur dioxide on novel adsorbents for flue gas desulfurization. Final report, September 1, 1994--February 29, 1996

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y.S. Lin ◽  
S.G. Deng
Keyword(s):  
Sulfur Dioxide ◽  
Flue Gas ◽  
Flue Gas Desulfurization ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Adsorption And Desorption

scholarly journals Evaluation of regenerable flue gas desulfurization processes. Volume I. Final report

1976 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Aul, Jr ◽  
R Delleney ◽  
G Brown ◽  
G Page ◽  
D Stuebner
Keyword(s):  
Flue Gas ◽  
Flue Gas Desulfurization ◽  
Final Report

ChemInform Abstract: ELECTROCHEMICAL SULFUR DIOXIDE CONCENTRATOR FOR FLUE-GAS DESULFURIZATION

1983 ◽  
Vol 14 (24) ◽  
Author(s):  
D. TOWNLEY ◽  
J. WINNICK
Keyword(s):  
Sulfur Dioxide ◽  
Flue Gas ◽  
Flue Gas Desulfurization

New Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Process Using Granular Limestone and Organic Acid Additives

2006 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shengyu Liu ◽  
Wende Xiao
Keyword(s):  
Acetic Acid ◽  
Sulfur Dioxide ◽  
Organic Acid ◽  
Removal Efficiency ◽  
Flue Gas ◽  
Flue Gas Desulfurization ◽  
So2 Removal ◽  
New Process ◽  
Desulfurization Process ◽  
Sulfur Dioxide Removal

A new wet FGD process in which sulfur dioxide was absorbed in the bubble reactor using granular limestone simultaneously adding acetic acid had been proposed. The main difference compared to conventional wet FGD process was the ability of the new process to utilize granular limestone directly as a desulphurization reagent simultaneously adding acetic acid. Thus, the pulverizing of limestone, which causes power consumption, can be saved. Only using granular limestone directly as absorbent without acetic acid, SO2 removal efficiency and limestone utilization were too low. Adding some concentration of acetic acid, the performance of the new wet FGD process was confirmed to be equal to or higher than that of a conventional process in various tests. Various parameters of the new FGD process which would affect the sulfur dioxide removal efficiency and limestone utilization were studied.

Dissolution kinetics of sorbents and effect of additives in wet flue gas desulfurization

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence Koech ◽  
Ray Everson ◽  
Hein Neomagus ◽  
Hilary Rutto
Keyword(s):  
Sulfur Dioxide ◽  
Flue Gas ◽  
Dissolution Kinetics ◽  
Flue Gas Desulfurization ◽  
Power Stations ◽  
Effect Of Additives ◽  
Kinetics Of

AbstractFlue gas desulfurization (FGD) technology has been adopted by a number of power stations for the removal of sulfur dioxide (SO

Electrochemical sulfur dioxide concentrator for flue-gas desulfurization

1983 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 389-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Townley ◽  
Jack Winnick
Keyword(s):  
Sulfur Dioxide ◽  
Flue Gas ◽  
Flue Gas Desulfurization
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document