Pre-operative Exposure to Ustekinumab: A Risk Factor for Postoperative Complications in Crohn's Disease (CD)?

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (13) ◽  
pp. 1369-1372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hang Hock Shim ◽  
Christopher Ma ◽  
Paulo Gustavo Kotze ◽  
Remo Panaccione

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the intestinal tract that is characterised by a relapsing and remitting course. Despite advancements in therapeutic options for CD, a substantial number of patients still require surgery for medically refractory disease or disease-related complications. Given the widespread adoption of biologic therapies for the management of patients with moderate-to-severe CD, a high number of patients are likely to be on biologic therapy at the time of needing intestinal surgery: the safety of biologics in perioperative setting is of great interest. While more clinical data are available for TNF antagonists and vedolizumab, the safety data for ustekinumab, an IL 12/23 inhibitor, is lacking. Here, we review the available data from published literature on the postoperative outcomes for CD patients exposed to ustekinumab perioperatively.

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (10) ◽  
pp. 989-991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan P. KamiŃSki ◽  
Emily Miraflor ◽  
Karen Zaghiyan ◽  
Phillip Fleshner

Treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) relies on medical therapy with surgery reserved for medically refractory cases. This study measured pharmaceutical therapies that CD patients receive before surgery. Prospective data were collected on 558 patients undergoing surgery for medically refractory CD from November 1999 through June 2014. Patient demographics and preoperative medical therapies were tabulated, including types and number of doses of aminosalicylic acid, corticosteroids, immunomodulators, and biologic therapies. Most patients had been treated with preoperative aminosalicylic acid (72%), steroids (77%), or immunomodulators (69%). Forty-two per cent of patients were treated with a biologic before surgery with a mean number of 20 doses (range, 1–130). In 29 per cent of patients, all therapeutic modalities were used before surgery. Biologic therapy was more common in the last seven years of the study compared with the first eight years (64% vs 35%; P < 0.01). More patients had been treated with all therapeutic modalities before surgery in the second half of the study period (37% vs 19%; P < 0.01). CD patients undergoing surgery have had extensive pharmaceutical treatment. In the current era, more patients have been placed on biologic therapies and more than one third of them failed all available classes of medications before surgical intervention.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S116-S117
Author(s):  
K Vadstrup ◽  
S Alulis ◽  
A Borsi ◽  
J Olsen ◽  
T R Jørgensen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Biologic response modifiers (biologics) has been introduced as potent drugs for the treatment of Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Whether this has resulted in a reduction in the need for surgical treatment is controversial. This study aims to explore the surgery rates of patients diagnosed with CD and UC between 2003 and 2015 and correlate to those treated with biologics or not in Denmark with a follow-up until 2016. Methods This national register study included patients diagnosed between 2003 and 2015 and followed up until 2016, identified in the Danish National Patient Registry (NPR). Biologic therapies available in (parts of) the study period were infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab and golimumab. Surgery rates were identified through three types: bowel resections (code KJFB), total colectomies (code KJFH) and resections and excisions of the rectum (code KJGB). The share of patients undergoing surgery or initiating and receiving biologic treatment in each year was analysed. Additionally, patients undergoing surgery were stratified to receiving biological treatment in a period before the surgery or not and the time to first surgery was investigated. Results Among 10,302 CD patients and 22,144 UC patients, 2,328 CD patients and 2,128 UC patients underwent intestinal resection. Numbers were driven by the two first surgery codes (97% for CD and 93% for UC), and &gt;1 resection was observed in 20% of the CD cases and more in the UC cases (40%), as expected due to reoperations. In the same period, 2,939 and 2,504 patients were treated with biologics for CD and UC, respectively, with an increase observed over the years. The vast majority were treated with an anti-TNF-α biologic, as vedolizumab was not approved in Denmark before 2015. We observed similar surgery rates of patients receiving biologics compared with those not treated with biologics. However, the time period from diagnosis to first intestinal surgery was observed to be longer for the patients treated with biologics (Figure1). Conclusion The number of patients undergoing intestinal resections or initiating biologic treatments after diagnosis increased throughout the study period for the full population. The risk of intestinal resections was similar in the group of patients who received biologicals compared with the group who did not, but the treatment seemed to postpone surgery in both diseases.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S72-S72
Author(s):  
Ahmed Elmoursi ◽  
Courtney Perry ◽  
Terrence Barrett

Abstract Background Stricturing Crohn’s disease (CD) constitutes a severe phenotype often associated with a high degree of morbidity (3). Surgical resection is first-line therapy for symptomatic strictures, but most patients relapse without subsequent medical therapy (4–5). Biologics are the mainstay for inducing and maintaining remission, but some cases are refractory despite maximum dosage of therapy. Reports of dual biological therapy (DBT) in refractory, stricturing CD are sparse, and prior case reports document only clinical remission (1). To contribute further knowledge regarding the use of DBT in stricturing CD, we present the case of a refractory CD patient who achieved deep remission with ustekinumab and vedolizumab. Case Presentation A 35 year old non-smoking, Caucasian male was referred to our clinic in 2014 for refractory CD complicated by multiple strictures. Prior to establishing care with us, he received two jejunal resections and a sigmoid resection. Previously failed therapies included azathioprine with infliximab, adalimumab, and certolizumab. He continued to progress under our care despite combination methotrexate/certolizumab, as well as methotrexate/golimumab. He underwent proctocolectomy with end ileostomy in 2015 and initiated vedolizumab q8weeks post-operatively. He reoccurred in 2018, when he presented with an ulcerated ileal stricture. He was switched from vedolizumab to ustekinumab q8weeks and placed on prednisone, but continued to progress, developing significant hematochezia requiring hospitalization and blood transfusions. Ileoscopy performed during hospital admission confirmed severe, ulcerating disease in the ileum with stricture. Ustekinumab dosing was increased to q4weeks, azathioprine was initiated, and he underwent stricturoplasty. Follow-up ileoscopy three months later revealed two ulcers in the neo- TI (Figure 1). Vedolizumab q8weeks was initiated in addition to ustekinumab q4weeks and azathioprine 125mg. After four months on this regimen the patient felt better, but follow-up ileoscopy showed two persistent ulcers in the neo-TI. Vedolizumab dosing interval was increased to q4weeks. After four months, subsequent ileoscopy demonstrated normal neo-TI (Figure 2). Histologic evaluation of biopsies confirmed deep remission of crohn’s disease. No adverse side effects have occurred with maximum doses of both ustekinumab and vedolizumab combination therapy. Discussion This case supports both the safety and efficacy of ustekinumab and vedolizumab dual biologic therapy for treatment of severe, refractory Crohn’s disease. While there are reports of DBT inducing clinical remission, this case supports efficacy for vedolizumab and ustekinumab combination therapy to induce deep histologic remission. Large practical clinical trials are needed to better investigate the safety and efficacy of DBT with vedolizumab and ustekinumab, but our case suggests this combination may be a safe and efficacious therapy for refractory CD patients.


Author(s):  
Christian Stöss ◽  
Maximilian Berlet ◽  
Stefan Reischl ◽  
Ulrich Nitsche ◽  
Marie-Christin Weber ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Despite primary conservative therapy for Crohn’s disease, a considerable proportion of patients ultimately needs to undergo surgery. Presumably, due to the increased use of biologics, the number of surgeries might have decreased. This study aimed to delineate current case numbers and trends in surgery in the era of biological therapy for Crohn’s disease. Methods Nationwide standardized hospital discharge data (diagnosis-related groups statistics) from 2010 to 2017 were used. All patients who were admitted as inpatient Crohn’s disease cases in Germany were included. Time-related development of admission numbers, rate of surgery, morbidity, and mortality of inpatient Crohn’s disease cases were analyzed. Results A total number of 201,165 Crohn’s disease cases were included. Within the analyzed time period, the total number of hospital admissions increased by 10.6% (n = 23,301 vs. 26,069). While gender and age distribution remained comparable, patients with comorbidities such as stenosis formation (2010: 10.1%, 2017: 13.4%) or malnutrition (2010: 0.8%, 2017: 3.2%) were increasingly admitted. The total number of all analyzed operations for Crohn’s disease increased by 7.5% (2010: n = 1567; 2017: n = 1694). On average, 6.8 ± 0.2% of all inpatient patients received ileocolonic resections. Procedures have increasingly been performed minimally invasive (2010: n = 353; 2017: n = 687). The number of postoperative complications remained low. Conclusion Despite the development of novel immunotherapeutics, the number of patients requiring surgery for Crohn’s disease remains stable. Interestingly, patients have been increasingly hospitalized with stenosis and malnutrition. The trend towards more minimally invasive operations has not relevantly changed the rate of overall complications.


2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 877-879 ◽  
Author(s):  
John K Marshall

The Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment (CCOHTA) published an economic analysis, using a Markov model, of infliximab therapy for Crohn’s disease that is refractory to other treatments. This was the first fully published economic analysis that addresses this treatment option. Health state transitions were based on data from Olmsted County, Minnesota, health state resource profiles were created using expert opinion and a number of assumptions were made when designing the model. The analysis was rigorous, the best available efficacy and safety data were used, state-of-the art sensitivity analyses were undertaken and an ‘acceptability curve‘ was constructed. The model found that infliximab was effective in increasing quality-adjusted life years when offered in a variety of protocols, but it was associated with high incremental cost utility ratios compared with usual care. The results should be interpreted, however, in view of a number of limitations. The time horizon for the analysis was short (one year), because of a lack of longer-term efficacy data, and might have led to an underestimation of the benefits from averting surgery. Because the analysis was performed from the perspective of a Canadian provincial ministry of health, only direct medical costs were considered. Patients with active Crohn’s disease are likely to incur significant indirect costs, which could be mitigated by this medication. The analysis should be updated as new data become available. Moreover, small changes in the cost of the medication could make the treatment cost effective, according to this model. Economic analyses, such as the one undertaken by the CCOHTA, cannot by themselves solve dilemmas in the allocation of limited health care resources, and other considerations must be included when formulating policy. This is especially important for patients with severe Crohn’s disease, who have significant disability and for whom few therapeutic options exist.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document