scholarly journals Физика интерференции квантовых частиц

2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (11) ◽  
pp. 2130
Author(s):  
С.В. Ганцевич ◽  
В.Л. Гуревич
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Quantum Correlation ◽  
Physical Mechanism ◽  
Choice Experiments ◽  
Particle Trajectories ◽  
Quantum Particles ◽  
Delayed Choice ◽  
Quantum Language

The bra+ket quantum language introduced earlier by the authors for the explanation of quantum correlation at macroscopic distances permit to understand the physical mechanism of the interference of separate quantum particles without the concepts of the transformation of a wave into a particle or vice versa as well as to avoid the assertions of retrocausality, nonlocality, instantaneous interaction or other similar phenomena allegedly inherent to quantum mechanics. Using the bra+ket approach we consider the experiments with two and three slits, the delayed choice experiments and some more complicated interference experiments with changing parameters the results of which caused the vivid many year discussion with adverse conclusions on particle trajectories in the interferometers.

scholarly journals Causal Intuition and Delayed-Choice Experiments

Entropy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Michael B. Heaney
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Classical Limit ◽  
Choice Experiments ◽  
Quantum Level ◽  
Delayed Choice ◽  
Symmetric Formulation ◽  
Quantum Analog ◽  
Level I ◽  
Block Universe

The conventional explanation of delayed-choice experiments appears to violate our causal intuition at the quantum level. I reanalyze these experiments using time-reversed and time-symmetric formulations of quantum mechanics. The time-reversed formulation does not give the same experimental predictions. The time-symmetric formulation gives the same experimental predictions but actually violates our causal intuition at the quantum level. I explore the reasons why our causal intuition may be wrong at the quantum level, suggest how conventional causation might be recovered in the classical limit, propose a quantum analog to the classical block universe viewpoint, and speculate on implications of the time-symmetric formulation for cosmological boundary conditions.

scholarly journals Causal Intuition and Delayed-Choice Experiments

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael B. Heaney
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Classical Limit ◽  
Choice Experiments ◽  
Quantum Level ◽  
Conventional Formulation ◽  
Delayed Choice ◽  
Apparent Violation ◽  
Level I

The conventional explanation of delayed-choice experiments seems to violate our causal intuition. This apparent violation is caused by a misinterpretation of the conventional formulation of quantum mechanics. I reanalyze these experiments using advanced and time-symmetric formulations of quantum mechanics. All three formulations give the same experimental predictions, but the advanced and time-symmetric formulations violate our causal intuition that effects only happen after causes. I explore reasons why our causal intuition may be wrong at the quantum level. I also suggest how conventional causation might be recovered in the classical limit, and speculate on cosmological boundary conditions.

Relational Blockworld and Quantum Mechanics

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Silberstein ◽  
W.M. Stuckey ◽  
Timothy McDevitt
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Measurement Problem ◽  
Quantum Nonlocality ◽  
Global Constraints ◽  
Quantum Superposition ◽  
Delayed Choice ◽  
Counterfactual Definiteness ◽  
Main Thread ◽  
Block Universe ◽  
Contextual Emergence

The main thread of chapter 4 introduces some of the major mysteries and interpretational issues of quantum mechanics (QM). These mysteries and issues include: quantum superposition, quantum nonlocality, Bell’s inequality, entanglement, delayed choice, the measurement problem, and the lack of counterfactual definiteness. All these mysteries and interpretational issues of QM result from dynamical explanation in the mechanical universe and are dispatched using the authors’ adynamical explanation in the block universe, called Relational Blockworld (RBW). A possible link between RBW and quantum information theory is provided. The metaphysical underpinnings of RBW, such as contextual emergence, spatiotemporal ontological contextuality, and adynamical global constraints, are provided in Philosophy of Physics for Chapter 4. That is also where RBW is situated with respect to retrocausal accounts and it is shown that RBW is a realist, psi-epistemic account of QM. All the relevant formalism for this chapter is provided in Foundational Physics for Chapter 4.

QLB for Quantum Many-Body and Quantum Field Theory

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sauro Succi
Keyword(s):  
Field Theory ◽  
Quantum Field Theory ◽  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Quantum Computing ◽  
Single Particle ◽  
Body Problem ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Quantum Field ◽  
Many Body ◽  
Quantum Particles

Chapter 32 expounded the basic theory of quantum LB for the case of relativistic and non-relativistic wavefunctions, namely single-particle quantum mechanics. This chapter goes on to cover extensions of the quantum LB formalism to the overly challenging arena of quantum many-body problems and quantum field theory, along with an appraisal of prospective quantum computing implementations. Solving the single particle Schrodinger, or Dirac, equation in three dimensions is a computationally demanding task. This task, however, pales in front of the ordeal of solving the Schrodinger equation for the quantum many-body problem, namely a collection of many quantum particles, typically nuclei and electrons in a given atom or molecule.

scholarly journals Locality and entanglement of indistinguishable particles

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Till Jonas Frederick Johann ◽  
Ugo Marzolino
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Quantum Correlation ◽  
Indistinguishable Particle ◽  
Local Operators

AbstractEntanglement is one of the strongest quantum correlation, and is a key ingredient in fundamental aspects of quantum mechanics and a resource for quantum technologies. While entanglement theory is well settled for distinguishable particles, there are five inequivalent approaches to entanglement of indistinguishable particles. We analyse the different definitions of indistinguishable particle entanglement in the light of the locality notion. This notion is specified by two steps: (i) the identification of subsystems by means of their local operators; (ii) the requirement that entanglement represent correlations between the above subsets of operators. We prove that three of the aforementioned five entanglement definitions are incompatible with any locality notion defined as above.

scholarly journals QUANTUM SINGULARITIES IN STATIC SPACETIMES

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (05) ◽  
pp. 729-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOÃO PAULO M. PITELLI ◽  
PATRICIO S. LETELIER
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Wave Operator ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Quantum Mechanical ◽  
Mathematical Framework ◽  
Physical Content ◽  
Dirac Equations ◽  
Quantum Particles ◽  
Klein Gordon ◽  
Quantum Singularities

We review the mathematical framework necessary to understand the physical content of quantum singularities in static spacetimes. We present many examples of classical singular spacetimes and study their singularities by using wave packets satisfying Klein–Gordon and Dirac equations. We show that in many cases the classical singularities are excluded when tested by quantum particles but unfortunately there are other cases where the singularities remain from the quantum mechanical point of view. When it is possible we also find, for spacetimes where quantum mechanics does not exclude the singularities, the boundary conditions necessary to turn the spatial portion of the wave operator to be self-adjoint and emphasize their importance to the interpretation of quantum singularities.

Neutron delayed choice experiments

Physica B+C ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 137 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 266-269
Author(s):  
Herbert J. Bernstein
Keyword(s):  
Choice Experiments ◽  
Delayed Choice

scholarly journals Interesting Examples of Violation of the Classical Equivalence Principle but Not of the Weak One

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Antonio Accioly ◽  
Wallace Herdy
Keyword(s):  
Wave Function ◽  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Gravitational Field ◽  
Experimental Test ◽  
Equivalence Principle ◽  
Free Fall ◽  
Higher Order ◽  
Tree Level ◽  
Quantum Particles ◽  
Bohr Atom

The equivalence principle (EP) and Schiff’s conjecture are discussed en passant, and the connection between the EP and quantum mechanics is then briefly analyzed. Two semiclassical violations of the classical equivalence principle (CEP) but not of the weak one (WEP), i.e., Greenberger gravitational Bohr atom and the tree-level scattering of different quantum particles by an external weak higher-order gravitational field, are thoroughly investigated afterwards. Next, two quantum examples of systems that agree with the WEP but not with the CEP, namely, COW experiment and free fall in a constant gravitational field of a massive object described by its wave-function Ψ, are discussed in detail. Keeping in mind that, among the four examples focused on in this work only COW experiment is based on an experimental test, some important details related to it are presented as well.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document