Estimating Carrying Capacity for Sea Otters in British Columbia

2008 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 382-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward J. Gregr ◽  
Linda M. Nichol ◽  
Jane C. Watson ◽  
John K. B. Ford ◽  
Graeme M. Ellis
1981 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 291-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Morris ◽  
Derek V. Ellis ◽  
Brian P. Emerson

2019 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 1073-1089 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Tim Tinker ◽  
Verena A. Gill ◽  
George G. Esslinger ◽  
James Bodkin ◽  
Melissa Monk ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 287 (1940) ◽  
pp. 20202343
Author(s):  
Hannah P. Wellman ◽  
Rita M. Austin ◽  
Nihan D. Dagtas ◽  
Madonna L. Moss ◽  
Torben C. Rick ◽  
...  

Genetic analyses are an important contribution to wildlife reintroductions, particularly in the modern context of extirpations and ecological destruction. To address the complex historical ecology of the sea otter ( Enhydra lutris ) and its failed 1970s reintroduction to coastal Oregon, we compared mitochondrial genomes of pre-extirpation Oregon sea otters to extant and historical populations across the range. We sequenced, to our knowledge, the first complete ancient mitogenomes from archaeological Oregon sea otter dentine and historical sea otter dental calculus. Archaeological Oregon sea otters ( n = 20) represent 10 haplotypes, which cluster with haplotypes from Alaska, Washington and British Columbia, and exhibit a clear division from California haplotypes. Our results suggest that extant northern populations are appropriate for future reintroduction efforts. This project demonstrates the feasibility of mitogenome capture and sequencing from non-human dental calculus and the diverse applications of ancient DNA analyses to pressing ecological and conservation topics and the management of at-risk/extirpated species.


Author(s):  
Ian Davis ◽  
Timpthy Dellapenna ◽  
Gary Maale ◽  
Francis Gelwick ◽  
Fred Selts ◽  
...  

Identifying factors that influence sea otter (Enhydra lutris) population density can provide insight into why it varies spatially and temporally and when a recovering population has reached an equilibrium density because of food resources (i.e., carrying capacity K). Although food availability is widely recognized as an important extrinsic factor affecting sea otter density, how do we determine when a population has reached K? The goal of this study was to estimate K for Simpson Bay, Alaska by measuring the abundance of edible bivalves, the primary prey for sea otters for over 40 years. We then compared prey abundance and estimated replacement rate (i.e., the mean age of bivalves predated by sea otters) to estimated annual prey consumption based on the mean population density for the past 18 years. On average, 110 adult sea otters (5.2 km−2) have occupied Simpson Bay annually since 2001 consuming an estimated 176,660 kg of bivalves. The total mass (standing stock) of the major bivalves (predominately butter clams and stained macomas) was 785,730 kg, so adult sea otters consumed about 22% annually. Based on these observations and calculations, the estimated annual number of sea otters occupying Simpson Bay appears to be at or near K based on the replacement rate of food resources. However, other intrinsic (e.g., male territoriality and emigration) and extrinsic (e.g., predation, disease, human-related mortality) factors may influence equilibrium density, which varies spatially and temporally, resulting in a mosaic of subpopulations with different densities, rates of growth and discontinuous distributions. Understanding the balance among these factors may be one of the most challenging ecological questions for sea otter conservation and management as populations recover from their range-wide decimation during the Maritime Fur Trade in the late 18th and 19th centuries


2004 ◽  
Vol 118 (2) ◽  
pp. 270
Author(s):  
Kimberly Raum-Suryan ◽  
Kenneth Pitcher ◽  
Richard Lamy

On 27 June 2001 we observed and photographed a Sea Otter (Enhydra lutris) adjacent to a Steller Sea Lion (Eumetopias jubatus) haulout near Sgang Gwaay (Anthony Island), Haida Gwaii / Queen Charlotte Islands. This is one of only eight documented sightings of Sea Otters in these waters during the past 30 years. These sightings may represent the beginning of the expansion of Sea Otters to their former range off Haida Gwaii.


Ecosystems ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin Slade ◽  
Iain McKechnie ◽  
Anne K. Salomon

AbstractThe historic extirpation and subsequent recovery of sea otters (Enhydra lutris) have profoundly changed coastal social-ecological systems across the northeastern Pacific. Today, the conservation status of sea otters is informed by estimates of population carrying capacity or growth rates independent of human impacts. However, archaeological and ethnographic evidence suggests that for millennia, complex hunting and management protocols by Indigenous communities limited sea otter abundance near human settlements to reduce the negative impacts of this keystone predator on shared shellfish prey. To assess relative sea otter prevalence in the Holocene, we compared the size structure of ancient California mussels (Mytilus californianus) from six archaeological sites in two regions on the Pacific Northwest Coast, to modern California mussels at locations with and without sea otters. We also quantified modern mussel size distributions from eight locations on the Central Coast of British Columbia, Canada, varying in sea otter occupation time. Comparisons of mussel size spectra revealed that ancient mussel size distributions are consistently more similar to modern size distributions at locations with a prolonged absence of sea otters. This indicates that late Holocene sea otters were maintained well below carrying capacity near human settlements as a result of human intervention. These findings illuminate the conditions under which sea otters and humans persisted over millennia prior to the Pacific maritime fur trade and raise important questions about contemporary conservation objectives for an iconic marine mammal and the social-ecological system in which it is embedded.


2003 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas M. Burn ◽  
Angela M. Doroff ◽  
M. Tim Tinker

2001 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 294-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin L. Laidre ◽  
Ronald J. Jameson ◽  
Douglas P. Demaster

1978 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 874-876 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Bigg ◽  
I. B. MacAskie
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document