scholarly journals Novel mHealth App to Deliver Geriatric Assessment-Driven Interventions for Older Adults With Cancer: Pilot Feasibility and Usability Study (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kah Poh Loh ◽  
Erika Ramsdale ◽  
Eva Culakova ◽  
Jason H Mendler ◽  
Jane L Liesveld ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Older patients with cancer are at an increased risk of adverse outcomes. A geriatric assessment (GA) is a compilation of reliable and validated tools to assess domains that are predictors of morbidity and mortality, and it can be used to guide interventions. However, the implementation of GA and GA-driven interventions is low due to resource and time limitations. GA-driven interventions delivered through a mobile app may support the complex needs of older patients with cancer and their caregivers. OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and usability of a novel app (TouchStream) and to identify barriers to its use. As an exploratory aim, we gathered preliminary data on symptom burden, health care utilization, and satisfaction. METHODS In a single-site pilot study, we included patients aged ≥65 years undergoing treatment for systemic cancer and their caregivers. TouchStream consists of a mobile app and a Web portal. Patients underwent a GA at baseline with the study team (on paper), and the results were used to guide interventions delivered through the app. A tablet preloaded with the app was provided for use at home for 4 weeks. Feasibility metrics included usability (system usability scale of >68 is considered above average), recruitment, retention (number of subjects consented who completed postintervention assessments), and percentage of days subjects used the app. For the last 8 patients, we assessed their symptom burden (severity and interference with 17-items scored from 0-10 where a higher score indicates worse symptoms) using a clinical symptom inventory, health care utilization from the electronic medical records, and satisfaction (6 items scored on a 5-point Likert Scale for both patients and caregivers where a higher score indicates higher satisfaction) using a modified satisfaction survey. Barriers to use were elicited through interviews. RESULTS A total of 18 patients (mean age 76.8, range 68-87) and 13 caregivers (mean age 69.8, range 38-81) completed the baseline assessment. Recruitment and retention rates were 67% and 80%, respectively. The mean SUS score was 74.0 for patients and 72.2 for caregivers. Mean percentage of days the TouchStream app was used was 78.7%. Mean symptom severity and interference scores were 1.6 and 2.8 at preintervention, and 0.9 and 1.5 at postintervention, respectively. There was a total of 27 clinic calls during the intervention period and 15 during the postintervention period (week 5-8). One patient was hospitalized during the intervention period (week 1-4) and two patients during the postintervention period (week 5-8). Mean satisfaction scores of patients and caregivers with the mobile app were 20.4 and 23.4, respectively. Barriers fell into 3 themes: general experience, design, and functionality. CONCLUSIONS TouchStream is feasible and usable for older patients on cancer treatment and their caregivers. Future studies should evaluate the effects of the TouchStream on symptoms and health care utilization in a randomized fashion.

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1468-P
Author(s):  
SHIVANI PRIYADARSHNI ◽  
SRUTHI NELLURI ◽  
ZUBAIR RAHAMAN ◽  
MICHAEL J. MINTZER ◽  
STUTI DANG ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 121 (16) ◽  
pp. 2840-2848 ◽  
Author(s):  
Areej R. El-Jawahri ◽  
Gregory A. Abel ◽  
David P. Steensma ◽  
Thomas W. LeBlanc ◽  
Amir T. Fathi ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 301-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen C. Kales ◽  
Frederic C. Blow ◽  
C. Raymond Bingham ◽  
Jeffrey Scott Roberts ◽  
Laurel A. Copeland ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. JCO.20.03609
Author(s):  
Kathi Mooney ◽  
Karen Titchener ◽  
Benjamin Haaland ◽  
Lorinda A. Coombs ◽  
Brock O'Neil ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Patients with cancer experience high rates of morbidity and unplanned health care utilization and may benefit from new models of care. We evaluated an adult oncology hospital at home program's rate of unplanned hospitalizations and health care costs and secondarily, emergency department (ED) use, length of hospital stays, and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions during the 30 days after enrollment. METHODS We conducted a prospective, nonrandomized, real-world cohort comparison of 367 hospitalized patients with cancer—169 patients consecutively admitted after hospital discharge to Huntsman at Home (HH), a hospital-at-home program, compared with 198 usual care patients concurrently identified at hospital discharge. All patients met clinical criteria for HH admission, but those in usual care lived outside the HH service area. Primary outcomes were the number of unplanned hospitalizations and costs during the 30 days after enrollment. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stays, ICU admissions, and ED visits during the 30 days after enrollment. RESULTS Groups were comparable except that more women received HH care. In propensity-weighted analyses, the odds of unplanned hospitalizations was reduced in the HH group by 55% (odds ratio, 0.45, 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.70; P < .001) and health care costs were 47% lower (mean cost ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.72; P < .001) over the 30-day period. Secondary outcomes also favored HH. Total hospital stay days were reduced by 1.1 days ( P = .004) and ED visits were reduced by 45% (odds ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.92; P = .022). There was no evidence of a difference in ICU admissions ( P = .972). CONCLUSION This oncology hospital at home program shows initial promise as a model for oncology care that may lower unplanned health care utilization and health care costs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document