HealthChain: A Blockchain for Electronic Health Records (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonggang Xiao ◽  
Yanbing Liu ◽  
Yunjun Wu ◽  
Tun Li ◽  
Xingping Xian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Functional Requirements ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Blockchain Technology ◽  
Distributed Ledger ◽  
Electronic Health

BACKGROUND The maintenance of accurate health records of patients is a requirement of health care professionals. Furthermore, these records should be shared across different health care organizations in order for professionals to have a complete review of medical history and avoid missing important information. Nowadays, health care providers use electronic health records (EHRs) as a key to accomplishment of these jobs and delivery of quality care. However, there are technical and legal hurdles that prevent the adoption of these systems, such as the concern about performance and privacy issues. OBJECTIVE The aim of this paper is to build and evaluate an experimental blockchain for EHRs, named HealthChain, which addresses the disadvantages of traditional EHR systems. METHODS HealthChain is built based on consortium blockchain technology. Specifically, three stakeholders, namely hospitals, insurance providers, and governmental agencies, form a consortium that operates under a governance model, which enforces the business logic agreed by all participants. Peer nodes host instance of the distributed ledger consisting of EHRs, and instance of chaincode regulating the permissions of participants; designated orderers establish consensus on the order of EHRs and then disseminate blocks to peers. RESULTS HealthChain achieves the functional and non-functional requirements. While it can store EHRs in distributed ledger and share them among different participants, it demonstrates superior features, such as privacy preserving, security, and high throughout. These are the main reasons why HealthChain is proposed. CONCLUSIONS Consortium blockchain technology can help build EHR system and solve the problems that prevent the adoption of traditional ones.

Impact of simulation training on self-efficacy of outpatient health care providers to use electronic health records

2015 ◽  
Vol 84 (6) ◽  
pp. 423-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasna Vuk ◽  
Michael E. Anders ◽  
Cynthia C. Mercado ◽  
Robert L. Kennedy ◽  
Jessie Casella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Simulation Training ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Electronic Health

scholarly journals Exploring Perceptions of Health Care Providers' Use of Electronic Advance Directive Forms in Electronic Health Records

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-21
Author(s):  
Bunmi Folarinde ◽  
Gregory Lynn Alexander ◽  
Colleen Galambos ◽  
Bonnie J. Wakefield ◽  
Amy Vogelsmeier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Advance Directive ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Electronic Health

scholarly journals Patient Use and Experience With Online Access to Electronic Health Records in Norway: Results From an Online Survey (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Zanaboni ◽  
Per Egil Kummervold ◽  
Tove Sørensen ◽  
Monika Alise Johansen
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
National Health ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Health Condition ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Electronic Health

BACKGROUND The electronic health record (EHR) has been fully established in all Norwegian hospitals. Patient-accessible electronic health records (PAEHRs) are available to citizens aged 16 years and older through the national health portal Helsenorge. OBJECTIVE This study aimed at understanding how patients use PAEHRs. Three research questions were addressed in order to explore (1) characteristics of users, (2) patients’ use of the service, and (3) patient experience with the service. METHODS We conducted an online survey of users who had accessed their EHR online at least once through the national health portal. Patients from two of the four health regions in Norway were invited to participate. Quantitative data were supplemented by qualitative information. RESULTS A total of 1037 respondents participated in the survey, most of whom used the PAEHR regularly (305/1037, 29.4%) or when necessary (303/1037, 29.2%). Service utilization was associated with self-reported health, age, gender, education, and health care professional background. Patients found the service useful to look up health information (687/778, 88.3%), keep track of their treatment (684/778, 87.9%), prepare for a hospital appointment (498/778, 64.0%), and share documents with their general practitioner (292/778, 37.5%) or family (194/778, 24.9%). Most users found it easy to access their EHR online (965/1037, 93.1%) and did not encounter technical challenges. The vast majority of respondents (643/755, 85.2%) understood the content, despite over half of them acknowledging some difficulties with medical terms or phrases. The overall satisfaction with the service was very high (700/755, 92.7%). Clinical advantages to the patients included enhanced knowledge of their health condition (565/691, 81.8%), easier control over their health status (685/740, 92.6%), better self-care (571/653, 87.4%), greater empowerment (493/674, 73.1%), easier communication with health care providers (493/618, 79.8%), and increased security (655/730, 89.7%). Patients with complex, long-term or chronic conditions seemed to benefit the most. PAEHRs were described as useful, informative, effective, helpful, easy, practical, and safe. CONCLUSIONS PAEHRs in Norway are becoming a mature service and are perceived as useful by patients. Future studies should include experimental designs focused on specific populations or chronic conditions that are more likely to achieve clinically meaningful benefits. Continuous evaluation programs should be conducted to assess implementation and changes of wide-scale routine services over time.

scholarly journals Interaction Time with Electronic Health Records: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (04) ◽  
pp. 788-799
Author(s):  
Yuliya Pinevich ◽  
Kathryn J. Clark ◽  
Andrew M. Harrison ◽  
Brian W. Pickering ◽  
Vitaly Herasevich
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Interaction Time ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Inpatient Settings ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
Outpatient Settings

Abstract Background The amount of time that health care clinicians (physicians and nurses) spend interacting with the electronic health record is not well understood. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the time that health care providers spend interacting with electronic health records (EHR). Methods Data are retrieved from Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily, (Ovid) Embase, CINAHL, and SCOPUS. Study Eligibility Criteria Peer-reviewed studies that describe the use of EHR and include measurement of time either in hours, minutes, or in the percentage of a clinician's workday. Papers were written in English and published between 1990 and 2021. Participants All physicians and nurses involved in inpatient and outpatient settings. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods A narrative synthesis of the results, providing summaries of interaction time with EHR. The studies were rated according to Quality Assessment Tool for Studies with Diverse Designs. Results Out of 5,133 de-duplicated references identified through database searching, 18 met inclusion criteria. Most were time-motion studies (50%) that followed by logged-based analysis (44%). Most were conducted in the United States (94%) and examined a clinician workflow in the inpatient settings (83%). The average time was nearly 37% of time of their workday by physicians in both inpatient and outpatient settings and 22% of the workday by nurses in inpatient settings. The studies showed methodological heterogeneity. Conclusion This systematic review evaluates the time that health care providers spend interacting with EHR. Interaction time with EHR varies depending on clinicians' roles and clinical settings, computer systems, and users' experience. The average time spent by physicians on EHR exceeded one-third of their workday. The finding is a possible indicator that the EHR has room for usability, functionality improvement, and workflow optimization.

scholarly journals Patient Use and Experience With Online Access to Electronic Health Records in Norway: Results From an Online Survey

10.2196/16144 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. e16144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Zanaboni ◽  
Per Egil Kummervold ◽  
Tove Sørensen ◽  
Monika Alise Johansen
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
National Health ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Health Condition ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Electronic Health

Background The electronic health record (EHR) has been fully established in all Norwegian hospitals. Patient-accessible electronic health records (PAEHRs) are available to citizens aged 16 years and older through the national health portal Helsenorge. Objective This study aimed at understanding how patients use PAEHRs. Three research questions were addressed in order to explore (1) characteristics of users, (2) patients’ use of the service, and (3) patient experience with the service. Methods We conducted an online survey of users who had accessed their EHR online at least once through the national health portal. Patients from two of the four health regions in Norway were invited to participate. Quantitative data were supplemented by qualitative information. Results A total of 1037 respondents participated in the survey, most of whom used the PAEHR regularly (305/1037, 29.4%) or when necessary (303/1037, 29.2%). Service utilization was associated with self-reported health, age, gender, education, and health care professional background. Patients found the service useful to look up health information (687/778, 88.3%), keep track of their treatment (684/778, 87.9%), prepare for a hospital appointment (498/778, 64.0%), and share documents with their general practitioner (292/778, 37.5%) or family (194/778, 24.9%). Most users found it easy to access their EHR online (965/1037, 93.1%) and did not encounter technical challenges. The vast majority of respondents (643/755, 85.2%) understood the content, despite over half of them acknowledging some difficulties with medical terms or phrases. The overall satisfaction with the service was very high (700/755, 92.7%). Clinical advantages to the patients included enhanced knowledge of their health condition (565/691, 81.8%), easier control over their health status (685/740, 92.6%), better self-care (571/653, 87.4%), greater empowerment (493/674, 73.1%), easier communication with health care providers (493/618, 79.8%), and increased security (655/730, 89.7%). Patients with complex, long-term or chronic conditions seemed to benefit the most. PAEHRs were described as useful, informative, effective, helpful, easy, practical, and safe. Conclusions PAEHRs in Norway are becoming a mature service and are perceived as useful by patients. Future studies should include experimental designs focused on specific populations or chronic conditions that are more likely to achieve clinically meaningful benefits. Continuous evaluation programs should be conducted to assess implementation and changes of wide-scale routine services over time.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document