Efficacy of a Single-Session "Empowered Relief" Zoom-Delivered Group Intervention for Chronic Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial Conducted During COVID-19 (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maisa Ziadni ◽  
Lluvia Gonzalez-Castro ◽  
Steven Anderson ◽  
Parthasarathy Krishnamurthy ◽  
Beth D Darnall

BACKGROUND Pain-cognitive behavioral therapy is an evidence-based treatment for chronic pain, with significant patient burden including healthcare cost, travel, multiple sessions, and lack of access in remote areas. A previously developed and efficacious single-session intervention “Empowered Relief” (ER) based on CBT principles has particular salience and fills an urgent clinical need during COVID-19. However, key questions remain about the efficacy of online-delivered ER. OBJECTIVE The primary goal is to pilot test the comparative efficacy of a single-session videoconference-delivered ER group to a waitlist control (WLC) among individuals with chronic pain. We hypothesized that ER would be superior to WLC for reductions in pain catastrophizing, pain intensity, and other pain-related outcomes at 1-3 months post-treatment. METHODS We conducted a randomized controlled trial involving an online sample of adults (N=104) aged 18-80 years with self-reported chronic pain. Participants were randomized (1:1) to one of the two unblinded study groups: ER (n=50) or a WLC (n=54). Participants allocated to ER completed a Zoom-delivered class, and all participants completed follow-up surveys at 2 weeks, 1, 2, and 3 months post-treatment. All study procedures occurred remotely and electronically. The primary outcome was pain catastrophizing one-month post-treatment, with pain intensity, pain bothersomeness, and sleep disruption as secondary outcomes. We also report a more rigorous test of the durability of treatment effects at 3 months post-treatment. Data were collected from September 2020 - February 2021 and analyzed using intention-to-treat analysis. The analytic dataset included participants (18% clinic patients, 82% community) who completed at least one study surveys: ER (n=50) and WLC (n=51). RESULTS Participants (N=101) were 69.3% (70/101) female, with mean age of 49.76 years (SD 13.90; range 24.00-78.00); 32.7% (33/101) had an undergraduate degree, with self-reported chronic pain >= 3 months. Participants reported high engagement (94%), high satisfaction with ER (mean 8.26, SD 1.57; range 0-10), and Zoom-platform (92%). For the between-groups factor, ER was superior to WLC for all primary and secondary outcomes at 3 -months post-treatment (highest P=.0001), and between-groups Cohen d effect sizes ranged from 0.45 to 0.79, indicating superiority was of moderate to substantial clinical importance. At 3 months, clinically meaningful PCS reductions were found for ER but not for WLC (ER: PCS, -8.72, 42.25% reduction; WLC: PCS -2.25, 11.13% reduction). ER resulted in significant improvements in pain intensity, sleep disturbance, and clinical improvements in pain bothersomeness. CONCLUSIONS Zoom-delivered ER had high participant satisfaction and very high engagement. Among adults with chronic pain, this single-session, Zoom-delivered, skills-based pain class resulted in clinically significant improvement across a range of pain-related outcomes and sustained at 3 months. Online delivery of ER could allow greater accessibility of home-based pain treatment and could address the inconveniences and barriers faced by patients when attempting to receive in-person care. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT 04546685, Registered on 04 September 2020.

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Soleymani ◽  
Abbas Masjedi Arani ◽  
Seyed Ahmad Raeissadat ◽  
Mohammad Hassan Davazdahemami

Background: Chronic pain remains or reappears for more than 3 to 6 months, and it is influencing 20% of the global population. The pain catastrophizing affects pain intensity and psychological conditions of patients with chronic pain. Rumination-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy (RFCBT) targets rumination as the key component of pain catastrophizing. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of RFCBT on depression, anxiety, and pain severity of individuals with chronic low back pain (LBP). Materials and Methods: In a randomized controlled trial, 30 patients aged between 20-55 years with diagnosed chronic LBP were chosen by convenience sampling and randomly allocated into intervention and control groups. All patients used their prescribed medications for pain management, but the intervention group received 12 weekly sessions of RFCBT, which was manualized psychotherapy to change unconstructive rumination to constructive rumination. Depression Anxiety and Stress scale-21 and chronic pain grade questionnaire were administered as pre-tests and re-administered after 3 and 6 months as post-test and follow-up assessments, respectively. Results: RFCBT significantly reduced depression (F1=23.01, P=0.001), anxiety (F1=25.7, P=0.001) and pain severity (F1=7.17, P=0.012) in patients with chronic LBP. Conclusion: RFCBT may offer benefits for treating patients with chronic low back pain when added to their usual pharmacological treatment. This benefit may be the result of targeting rumination as the key element of pain catastrophizing. [GMJ.2020;9:e1722]


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Côté-Picard ◽  
Jean Tittley ◽  
Catherine Mailloux ◽  
Kadija Perreault ◽  
Catherine Mercier ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Low back pain (LBP) is the first cause of years lived with disability worldwide. This is due to the development of chronic pain. Thus, it is necessary to identify the best therapeutic approaches in the acute phase of LBP to limit the transition to chronic pain. Superficial heat presents the highest level of evidence for short-term reduction in pain and disability in acute LBP. Physical activity is also recommended to avoid transition to chronic LBP, but there is a lack of evidence to determine its effect to reduce acute LBP. Also, the long-term effects of these interventions are unknown. This is a protocol for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to determine the short and long-term effects of wearable continuous low-level thermal therapy, in combination with exercises or not, on disability and pain. Methods/design Sixty-nine participants with acute LBP will be randomly assigned to one of three intervention programs: 1) thermal therapy, 2) thermal therapy + exercises, and 3) control. The interventions will be applied for 7 continuous days. The primary outcome will be disability and secondary outcomes will be pain intensity, pain-related fear, self-efficacy, number of steps walked and perception of change. The evaluators will be blinded to the interventions, and participants will be blinded to other groups’ interventions. Primary and secondary outcomes will be compared between intervention groups. Discussion This study will provide new evidence about acute LBP treatments, to limit transition to chronicity. This will be the first study to measure the long-term effects of wearable continuous low-level thermal therapy, combined or not to exercises. Trial registration This RCT has been retrospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03986047) on June 14th, 2019.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 793
Author(s):  
Michał Borys ◽  
Agata Hanych ◽  
Mirosław Czuczwar

Severe postoperative pain affects most patients after thoracotomy and is a risk factor for post-thoracotomy pain syndrome (PTPS). This randomized controlled trial compared preemptively administered ketamine versus continuous paravertebral block (PVB) versus control in patients undergoing posterolateral thoracotomy. The primary outcome was acute pain intensity on the visual analog scale (VAS) on the first postoperative day. Secondary outcomes included morphine consumption, patient satisfaction, and PTPS assessment with Neuropathic Pain Syndrome Inventory (NPSI). Acute pain intensity was significantly lower with PVB compared to other groups at four out of six time points. Patients in the PVB group used significantly less morphine via a patient-controlled analgesia pump than participants in other groups. Moreover, patients were more satisfied with postoperative pain management after PVB. PVB, but not ketamine, decreased PTPS intensity at 1, 3, and 6 months after posterolateral thoracotomy. Acute pain intensity at hour 8 and PTPS intensity at month 3 correlated positively with PTPS at month 6. Bodyweight was negatively associated with chronic pain at month 6. Thus, PVB but not preemptively administered ketamine decreases both acute and chronic pain intensity following posterolateral thoracotomies.


Author(s):  
Michał Borys ◽  
Agata Hanych ◽  
Mirosław Czuczwar

Severe postoperative pain affects most patients after thoracotomy and is a risk factor for post-thoracotomy pain syndrome (PTPS). This randomized controlled trial compared preemptively administered ketamine versus paravertebral block (PVB) versus control in patients undergoing posterolateral thoracotomy. The primary outcome was acute pain intensity on the visual analog scale (VAS) on the first postoperative day. Secondary outcomes included morphine consumption, patient satisfaction, and PTPS assessment with Neuropathic Pain Syndrome Inventory (NPSI). Acute pain intensity was significantly lower with PVB compared to other groups at four out of six time points. Patients in the PVB group used significantly less morphine via a patient-controlled analgesia pump than participants in other groups. Moreover, patients were more satisfied with postoperative pain management after PVB. PVB, but not ketamine, decreased PTPS intensity at 1, 3, and 6 months after posterolateral thoracotomy. Acute pain intensity at hour 8 and PTPS intensity at month 3 correlated positively with PTPS at month 6. Bodyweight was negatively associated with chronic pain at month 6. Thus, PVB but not preemptively administered ketamine decreases both acute and chronic pain intensity following posterolateral thoracotomies. The trial was prospectively registered at the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (https://www.anzctr.org.au/; ACTRN12616000900415; 07 July 2016).


2014 ◽  
Vol 2;17 (2;3) ◽  
pp. 145-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emil Sundstrup

Background: Chronic pain and disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand severely affect labor market participation. Ergonomic training and education is the default strategy to reduce physical exposure and thereby prevent aggravation of pain. An alternative strategy could be to increase physical capacity of the worker by physical conditioning. Objectives: To investigate the effect of 2 contrasting interventions, conventional ergonomic training (usual care) versus resistance training, on pain and disability in individuals with upper limb chronic pain exposed to highly repetitive and forceful manual work. Study Design: Examiner-blinded, parallel-group randomized controlled trial with allocation concealment. Setting: Slaughterhouses located in Denmark, Europe. Methods: Sixty-six adults with chronic pain in the shoulder, elbow/forearm, or hand/wrist and work disability were randomly allocated to 10 weeks of specific resistance training for the shoulder, arm, and hand muscles for 3 x 10 minutes per week, or ergonomic training and education (usual care control group). Pain intensity (average of shoulder, arm, and hand, scale 0 – 10) was the primary outcome, and disability (Work module of DASH questionnaire) as well as isometric shoulder and wrist muscle strength were secondary outcomes. Results: Pain intensity, disability, and muscle strength improved more following resistance training than usual care (P < 0.001, P = 0.05, P < 0.0001, respectively). Pain intensity decreased by 1.5 points (95% confidence interval -2.0 to -0.9) following resistance training compared with usual care, corresponding to an effect size of 0.91 (Cohen’s d). Limitations: Blinding of participants is not possible in behavioral interventions. However, at baseline outcome expectations of the 2 interventions were similar. Conclusion: Resistance training at the workplace results in clinical relevant improvements in pain, disability, and muscle strength in adults with upper limb chronic pain exposed to highly repetitive and forceful manual work. Trial registration: NCT01671267. Key words: Musculoskeletal pain, workability, shoulder pain, elbow pain, tennis elbow, wrist pain


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document