scholarly journals Adoption of Stroke Rehabilitation Technologies by the User Community: Qualitative Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. e15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Kerr ◽  
Mark Smith ◽  
Lynn Reid ◽  
Lynne Baillie
Stroke ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Chen ◽  
Yunan Chen ◽  
Kai Zheng ◽  
Lucy Dodakian ◽  
Jill See ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra G Brauer ◽  
Lauren Waters ◽  
Suzanne Kuys ◽  
Louise Ada

Background and Purpose: Despite evidence supporting the use of mechanically assisted walking training in stroke rehabilitation, it is not extensively used. The purpose of this study was a to explore the perceptions of physiotherapists regarding their use of mechanically assisted walking training, specifically treadmill training, during inpatient rehabilitation after stroke. Better understanding of physiotherapist perceptions can inform the development of translation strategies. Methods: A qualitative study using focus groups comprising 14 phsyiotherapists (including students) working in stroke inpatient rehabilitation at two sites was conducted. Transcripts were analysed using an inductive approach to thematic analysis. Results: Physiotherapists perceived two main themes related to using mechanically assisted walking training during inpatient rehabilitation; therapeutic consequences e.g. patients able to walk earlier, further, longer; less fatiguing for therapist, ability to manipulate walking parameters) and practical considerations (eg safety, efficiency, staff skill, access to equipment, weight and level of disability of patient, fear of treadmill). Discussion: Therapists perceptions of using mechanically assisted walking training during inpatient rehabilitation after stroke were mixed. There is a need to educate physiotherapy staff about the evidence of therapeutic value as well as how to perform mechanically assisted walking training.


2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 981-994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felicity A. S. Bright ◽  
Nicola M. Kayes ◽  
Kathryn M. McPherson ◽  
Linda E. Worrall

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (23-24) ◽  
pp. 4905-4914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mia I Loft ◽  
Ingrid Poulsen ◽  
Bente A Esbensen ◽  
Helle K Iversen ◽  
Lone L Mathiesen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 1396-1405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felicity AS Bright ◽  
Nicola M Kayes ◽  
Christine Cummins ◽  
Linda M Worrall ◽  
Kathryn M McPherson

Objective: To explore how practitioner engagement and disengagement occurred, and how these may influence patient care and engagement. Design: A qualitative study using the Voice Centred Relational Methodology. Data included interviews, focus groups and observations. Setting: Inpatient and community stroke rehabilitation services. Subjects: Eleven people experiencing communication disability after stroke and 42 rehabilitation practitioners. Interventions: Not applicable. Results: The practitioner’s engagement was important in patient engagement and service delivery. When patients considered practitioners were engaged, this helped engagement. When they considered practitioners were not engaged, their engagement was negatively affected. Practitioners considered their engagement was important but complex. It influenced how they worked and how they perceived the patient. Disengagement was taboo. It arose when not feeling confident, when not positively impacting outcomes, or when having an emotional response to a patient or interaction. Each party’s engagement influenced the other, suggesting it was co-constructed. Conclusions: Practitioner engagement influenced patient engagement in stroke rehabilitation. Practitioner disengagement was reported by most practitioners but was often a source of shame.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document