Road Asset Management with User Cost of Safety and Comfortably evaluated by Stated Preference Method

The paper determines the natural assets of territorial communities and reveals their components in the context of domestic legislation. Scientific approaches to the specified problem in domestic and western scientific thought are developed. The essence of the concept «natural assets» is revealed and their main features – the presence of the identified owner, active manager and user; cost; Legal Status; economic return are defined. The relationship between the categories «natural assets», «natural resources» and «natural resource potential» are established. The main difference between natural resources as the asset of territorial community and other types of assets – the need for dual approach to their management: to generate income, ensure community development and in the interests of all stakeholder groups; in order to preserve the natural environment is revealed. The scientific approach to natural resource management with the participation of local communities, which is based on the principles of subsidiarity, sustainability, fairness, accountability, efficiency, activity, adaptability, environmental responsibility, inclusiveness is analyzed. This approach has the following common features: decentralization of powers to manage natural assets; reconciling the interests of stakeholders and opportunities for efficient of natural resources use; combination of environmental and socio-economic goals in the process of natural asset management; development of institutions for increasing decision-making efficiency in the field of natural asset management at the community level; stakeholders education and notification. Scientific approaches to the systematization of natural assets of territorial communities in terms of stakeholders groups (by ownership of the asset, the possibility of access to the asset and competition in their use) are studied. The expediency of classifying stakeholders as natural assets of territorial communities by their interests is substantiated. The peculiarities of the use/utilization and possession of natural resources in accordance with the legislative acts regulating natural resource relations in Ukraine are revealed.

Download Full-text

Demand Forecast of Jakarta-Surabaya High Speed Rail based on Stated Preference Method

International Journal of Technology ◽

10.14716/ijtech.v10i2.2442 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 10 (2) ◽

pp. 405

Author(s):

Harun al-Rasyid Lubis ◽

Vinsensius Budiman Pantas ◽

Muhammad Farda

Keyword(s):

High Speed ◽

Stated Preference ◽

Demand Forecast ◽

High Speed Rail ◽

Stated Preference Method

Download Full-text

Sami Tourism in Northern Sweden: Measuring Tourists' Opinions Using Stated Preference Methodology

Tourism and Hospitality Research ◽

10.1177/146735840200300407 ◽

2002 ◽

Vol 3 (4) ◽

pp. 357-369 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Robert Pettersson

Keyword(s):

Stated Preference ◽

Supply And Demand ◽

The Other ◽

Small Companies ◽

Northern Sweden ◽

Considerable Potential ◽

Other Hand ◽

Stated Preference Method

A declining and restructured reindeer herd is forcing some Sami into other permanent or temporary occupations. In the Swedish parts of Sami land, Sápmi, an increasing number of Sami are involved in small companies dealing with tourism that focuses on their culture. These companies, their products and their location, are today relatively well known. What the tourists demand and appreciate, on the other hand, is not so well known. The purpose of this paper is to analyse which factors matter when tourists make their decisions. Using the stated preference method, respondents were requested to evaluate a number of hypothetical alternatives. The tourists' opinions and considerations were measured in respect of three attributes; the companies' offers, the prices for these products and access. The study shows that there seems to be a considerable potential in these kinds of activity and that there is, in some respects, a gap between supply and demand.

Download Full-text

VALUATION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE ASSET: ISSUES AND CHALLENGES

International Journal of Creative Future and Heritage (TENIAT) ◽

10.47252/teniat.v2i1.230 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 2 (1) ◽

pp. 65-75

Author(s):

Junainah Mohamad ◽

Suriatini Ismail ◽

Rosdi Ab Rahman

Keyword(s):

Cultural Heritage ◽

Stated Preference ◽

Economic Valuation ◽

Revealed Preference ◽

Valuation Method ◽

Asset Value ◽

Sustained Use ◽

Stated Preference Method ◽

Conventional Methods

AbstrakPenilaian hartanah warisan budaya adalah berbeza bila dibandingkan dengan aset atau hartanah lainkerana warisan budaya tidak dapat dijualbeli secara aktif dalam pasaran. Kebanyakan orang termasukprofesional dan orang awam beranggapan harta warisan budaya sangat bernilai dan tidak dapat dinilai.Keunikan harta warisan budaya ini menjadikannya sukar untuk dinilai dengan kaedah konvensional yangsedia ada. Kaedah-kaedah innovasi yang terkini yang digunakan dalam harta warisan budaya adalahStated Preference method dan Revealed Preference method. Kaedah ini adalah di bawah kategorikaedah penilain ekonomi bagi non-market goods. Pada asasnya, adalah sangat penting untuk menilaiharta warisan budaya kerana (1) untuk mengakui dan menghormati keseluruhan harta warisan budaya(2) untuk menghargai keperluan penyelenggaraan dan pemeliharaan harta warisan budaya dan (3) bagimembantu menjawab akauntabiliti bagi mengekalkan kegunaan harta warisan budaya yang berterusan.Disebabkan pemikiran lalu di mana kebanyakan orang beranggapan bahawa harta warisan budaya adalahnon-reproducible, non-economic commodity dan non-substitutable maka wujud cabaran dalam menilaiharta warisan budaya. Kajian ini menyenaraikan keperluan dan cabaran dalam menilai harta warisanbudaya. Abstract A valuation of cultural heritage asset is different from other kinds of asset or property because culturalheritage is not normally traded actively in the market. Most people including professional and the generalpublic think cultural heritage is priceless and cannot be valued. The uniqueness of cultural heritage assetsmakes it difficult to be valued using the existing conventional methods. The most recent innovative methodsused in valuing cultural heritage asset are Stated Preference method and Revealed Preference method.Both methods are under economic valuation method for non-market goods. Essentially, it is very importantto assess the cultural heritage asset value in order to 1) acknowledge and respect the full worth ofheritage asset, 2) appreciate the need for maintenance and preservation of cultural heritage asset and, 3)assist in responding to calls for more accountability for the sustained use of these assets. Because of pastthinking where people believe that cultural heritage asset is non-reproducible, non-economic commodityand non-substitutable there are challenges exist in valuing cultural heritage asset. This paper highlightsthe need and challenges in valuing cultural heritage asset.

Download Full-text