Abdominal Wall Endometriosis: Clinical Presentation and Imaging Features with Emphasis on Sonography

2006 ◽  
Vol 186 (3) ◽  
pp. 616-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-Hein J. Hensen ◽  
Adriaan C. Van Breda Vriesman ◽  
Julien B. C. M. Puylaert
2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-8
Author(s):  
Quorrata Eynul Forhad ◽  
Ali Akbar Biswas ◽  
Sk Monirul Islam ◽  
Md Shah Alam

Objective(s): The purpose of our study was to evaluate clinical findings and sonographic features of abdominal wall endometriosis and also to report its CT and MRI appearance.Materials and methods: A retrospective study was performed from January 2008 - December 2012, yielding 12 surgically proven cases of abdominal wall endometriosis. All patients had undergone sonography including power Doppler examination. Additional CT was performed in one case and MRI in four. Pathological material was preoperatively obtained by sonographically guided puncture in six patients. The clinical data were analyzed and the imaging studies were reviewed by radiologist working in consensus.Results: All patients had a history of at least one prior cesarean section. All patients’ C/S was done in this institution and 1500 C/S were performed within a period of 5 years giving a frequency of 0.8% scar endometriosis after C/S. All presented with focal pain near the surgical scar, which was cyclic in three patients. Nine patients presented with a palpable mass near the scar. Sonography detected 11 lesions within the abdominal wall with a mean diameter 25mm and in one case sonography could not identify any lesion. All lesions were hypoechoic, vascular, and solid, with some cystic changes in one. MRI CT scan showed enhancement of the lesions. Finally histopathologically all were proved as endometriosis’.Conclusion: Abdominal wall endometriosis frequently presents with noncyclic symptoms. Imaging findings of a solid mass near a cesarean section scar strongly suggest its diagnosis.Bangladesh J Obstet Gynaecol, 2014; Vol. 29(1) : 3-8


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 342-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe R. Koninckx ◽  
Anastasia Ussia ◽  
Arnaud Wattiez ◽  
Errico Zupi ◽  
Victor Gomel

2020 ◽  
Vol 148 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 484-488
Author(s):  
Goran Malenkovic ◽  
Sanja Tomic ◽  
Jasmina Boban ◽  
Nensi Lalic ◽  
Marko Bojovic

Introduction. Endometriosis represents a functional endometrium outside the uterine cavity. Ectopic endometrial tissue has been identified within the pelvis, affecting both pelvic and extrapelvic organs, causing recurrent pelvic or abdominal pain corresponding to the menstrual cycle. The incidence of abdominal wall endometriosis after Cesarean section is approximately 2%. It is often mistaken for other conditions primarily because this condition is underestimated on imaging. The objective of this case series is to summarize possible clinical and radiological presentations of this uncommon condition. Outline of cases. The authors present a case series of five patients who developed abdominal wall endometriosis after Cesarean section. Having been diagnosed clinically, the patients underwent open abdominal surgery, and were treated by surgical resection. Conclusion. Good clinical practice and excellent surgical techniques may help in preventing endometriosis, while adequate clinical examination and proper imaging can help in presurgical planning and successful definitive treatment.


2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 478-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaraq Khan ◽  
Valentina Zanfagnin ◽  
Sherif A. El-Nashar ◽  
Abimbola O. Famuyide ◽  
Gaurang S. Daftary ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mihaela Grigore ◽  
Demetra Socolov ◽  
Ioana Pavaleanu ◽  
Ioana Scripcariu ◽  
Ana Maria Grigore ◽  
...  

Abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE) is a rare condition defined by the presence of endometrial tissue in the subcutaneous fatty layer and the muscles of the abdominal wall. It is usually caused by the dissemination of endometrial tissue in the wound at the time of obstetrical and gynecological surgeries. AWE is rare and difficult to diagnose. The most frequent clinical presentation is that of a palpable subcutaneous mass near surgical scars associated with cyclic pain and swelling during menses. AWE may be an underreported pathology partly because it has scarcely received attention in the radiologic literature. Its frequency is expected to rise along with the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries; thus, it is important that physicians or sonographers are familiar with this pathology. The purpose of our review is to present the latest data regarding risk factors, clinical and imagisticfindings, and management of AWE.


Author(s):  
Daniela Yela ◽  
Lucas Trigo ◽  
Cristina Benetti-Pinto

Purpose To determine the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE), as well as the rate and recurrence factors for the disease. Methods A retrospective study of 52 women with AWE was performed at Universidade Estadual de Campinas from 2004 to 2014. Of the 231 surgeries performed for the diagnosis of endometriosis, 52 women were found to have abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE). The frequencies, means and standard deviations of the clinical characteristics of these women were calculated, as well as the recurrence rate of AWE. To determine the risk factors for disease recurrence, Fisher's exact test was used. Results The mean age of the patients was 30.71 ± 5.91 years. The main clinical manifestations were pain (98%) and sensation of a mass (36.5%). We observed that 94% of these women had undergone at least 1 cesarean section, and 73% had used medication for the postoperative control of endometriosis. The lesion was most commonly located in the cesarean section scar (65%). The recurrence rate of the disease was of 26.9%. All 14 women who had relapsed had surgical margins compromised in the previous surgery. There was no correlation between recurrent AWE and a previous cesarean section (p = 0.18), previous laparotomy (p = 0.11), previous laparoscopy (p = 0.12) and postoperative hormone therapy (p = 0.51). Conclusion Women with previous cesarean sections with local pain or lumps should be investigated for AWE. The recurrence of AWE is high, especially when the first surgery is not appropriate and leaves compromised surgical margins.


2008 ◽  
Vol 196 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Horton ◽  
Kent J. DeZee ◽  
Eric P. Ahnfeldt ◽  
Michel Wagner

Neurographics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-148
Author(s):  
K.N. Anderson ◽  
W.B. Overcast ◽  
J.R. Brosch ◽  
B.D. Graner ◽  
M.C. Veronesi

Protein misfolding has been an area of intense research and is implicated in a number of neurodegenerative diseases. Key proteins in the brain lose their native ability to fold and instead assume abnormal conformations. Misfolded proteins cluster to form pathologic aggregates, which cause cellular dysfunction, neuronal death, and neurodegeneration. The prionopathies are best known among the neurodegenerative diseases for their ability to misfold, self-propagate, and infect other organisms. There is increasing evidence of a rationale for a prionlike mechanism of spread of other neurodegenerative diseases through a similar seeding mechanism. In this review, we detail the role of a key protein aberration known to the various prion diseases, including sporadic, variant, and iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease; variably protease-sensitive prionopathy; Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker disease; fatal familial insomnia; and kuru. We also discuss the clinical presentation, the available, and emerging imaging options for these diseases. In the second part of this review, we delineate how a prionlike seeding process may be driving the progression of other neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson disease, Alzheimer disease, and Huntington disease. A discussion of clinical presentation and imaging features of these example diseases follows to make a case for a common approach to developing imaging biomarkers and therapies of these diseases.Learning Objective: Upon completion of this article, one should be able to describe the various types of prion diseases, recognize and identify the common the neuro-imaging findings in prion diseases, describe seeding mechanism of prion disease, list the common amyloid PET tracers used for Alzheimer’s disease, and list common imaging biomarkers in neurodegenerative diseases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document