Calcific tendinitis of the long head of the biceps brachii distal to the glenohumeral joint: plain film radiographic findings

1989 ◽  
Vol 153 (5) ◽  
pp. 1011-1016 ◽  
Author(s):  
AB Goldman
2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 2670-2678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa J.C. Wood ◽  
Michelle B. Sabick ◽  
Ron P. Pfeiffer ◽  
Seth M. Kuhlman ◽  
Jason H. Christensen ◽  
...  

Background: Despite considerable medical advances, arthroscopy remains the only definitive means of superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) lesion diagnosis. Natural shoulder anatomic variants limit the reliability of radiographic findings and clinical evaluations are not consistent. Accurate clinical diagnostic techniques would be advantageous because of the invasiveness, patient risk, and financial cost associated with arthroscopy. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the behavior of the joint-stabilizing muscles in provocative tests for SLAP lesions. Electromyography was used to characterize the muscle behavior, with particular interest in the long head of the biceps brachii (LHBB), as activation of the long head and subsequent tension in the biceps tendon should, based on related research, elicit labral symptoms in SLAP lesion patients. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Volunteers (N = 21) without a history of shoulder injury were recruited. The tests analyzed were active compression, Speed’s, pronated load, biceps load I, biceps load II, resisted supination external rotation, and Yergason’s. Tests were performed with a dynamometer to improve reproducibility. Muscle activity was recorded for the long and short heads of the biceps brachii, anterior deltoid, pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi, infraspinatus, and supraspinatus. Muscle behavior for each test was characterized by peak activation and proportion of muscle activity. Results: Speed’s, active compression palm-up, bicep I, and bicep II produced higher long head activations. Resisted supination external rotation, bicep I, bicep II, and Yergason’s produced a higher LHBB proportion. Conclusion: Biceps load I and biceps load II elicited promising long head behavior (high activation and selectivity). Speed’s and active compression palm up elicited higher activation of the LHBB, and resisted supination and Yergason’s elicited selective LHBB activity. These top performing tests utilize a unique range of test variables that may prove valuable for optimal SLAP test design and performance. Clinical Relevance: This study examines several provocative tests that are frequently used in the clinical setting as a means of evaluating a potential SLAP lesion.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. e229218
Author(s):  
Deepanjan Bhattacharya ◽  
Pratap Patra ◽  
Rakesh Kumar Pilania ◽  
Ankur Kumar Jindal

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is uncommon in routine practice of a paediatrician and injuries arising out of CPR are extremely rare especially in those involving children. A 41-year-old senior resident of paediatrics performed CPR on a young boy, following which he complained of pain in the left shoulder with restriction of all movements and flexion of the left elbow. MRI of the left shoulder revealed tear of the long head of biceps brachii, soft tissue oedema in left deltoid muscle and mild effusion in left glenohumeral joint with extension into subcapsularis bursa. He was treated conservatively with analgesics, following which there was significant improvement and full recovery of shoulder movements. Injuries to the resuscitator have been rarely reported in literature and mostly limited to adult CPR. We report this case to highlight an unusual complication to resuscitator transpiring from paediatric resuscitation.


2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 1478-1481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung Cheon Kim ◽  
Kwang Jin Rhee ◽  
Hyun Dae Shin ◽  
Young Mo Kim

1988 ◽  
Vol &NA; (228) ◽  
pp. 233???239 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. MARC MARIANI ◽  
ROBERT H. COFIELD ◽  
LINDA J. ASKEW ◽  
GUOPING LI ◽  
EDMUND Y. S. CHAO
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e2071-e2076
Author(s):  
Wyatt J. Andersen ◽  
Matheus Barcelos ◽  
Maurício de Paiva Raffaelli ◽  
Alan M. Hirahara

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0010
Author(s):  
Brian M. Godshaw ◽  
Nicholas Kolodychuk ◽  
Benjamin Bryan Browning ◽  
Gerard Williams ◽  
Rachel Burdette ◽  
...  

Objectives: The long head of the biceps tendon is a frequent pain generator within the shoulder. It is subjected to trauma and wear within the glenohumeral joint and within the intertubercular groove. Tenodesis of this tendon is a common treatment option for patients experiencing biceps tendon related pain. There are several different techniques to perform this procedure. Proximal intra-articular tenodesis can be performed but leaves the tendon within the intertubercular groove. Alternatively, suprapectoral tenodesis can be performed removing the tendon from the bicipital groove and sheath while avoiding conversion to an open procedure. Further, suprapectoral tenodesis limits complications associated with an open distally based incision. Several studies have compared these techniques to tenotomy or open-subpectoral tenodesis. This is the first study to directly compare patient outcomes between intra-articular and suprapectoral bicep tenodeses. Methods: Retrospective review of patients undergoing intra-articular or suprapectoral arthroscopic biceps tenodesis from 2010 - 2015. Clinical outcomes were measured at set intervals post-operatively (3 months, 6 months, and 12 months) and compared to pre-operative scores. Outcome measures included short form-12, both physical (PSF) and mental (MSF) component scores, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES). Results: A total of 96 patients were available for this study, 43 had intra-articular tenodesis and 56 had suprapectoral tenodesis. There was no difference in functional outcomes between intra and extra articular biceps tenodesis at 1-year post-operative. The intra-articular group had a quicker improvement in scores with the greatest increase at 3 months post-operatively, specifically in PSF group (p=0.016): however, this difference leveled off at 1-year follow up (p=0.238). The intra-articular group had greater absolute scores at all measured time points, but not significantly. Both groups showed improvement in all outcome measures and there was found to be no difference in changes for ASES, PSF, or MSF (p=0.262, p=0.489, and p=0.907 respectively). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that both intra-articular and surpapectoral techniques are acceptable options for biceps tenodesis. Despite leaving the biceps tendon within the glenohumeral joint and intertubercular groove, the intra-articular technique offers similar improvement in outcome measures to the suprapectoral technique.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document