scholarly journals Suprapectoral vs. Intra Articular Biceps Tenodesis: A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0010
Author(s):  
Brian M. Godshaw ◽  
Nicholas Kolodychuk ◽  
Benjamin Bryan Browning ◽  
Gerard Williams ◽  
Rachel Burdette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Glenohumeral Joint ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Biceps Tendon ◽  
Biceps Tenodesis ◽  
Measured Time ◽  
Long Head ◽  
Distally Based

Objectives: The long head of the biceps tendon is a frequent pain generator within the shoulder. It is subjected to trauma and wear within the glenohumeral joint and within the intertubercular groove. Tenodesis of this tendon is a common treatment option for patients experiencing biceps tendon related pain. There are several different techniques to perform this procedure. Proximal intra-articular tenodesis can be performed but leaves the tendon within the intertubercular groove. Alternatively, suprapectoral tenodesis can be performed removing the tendon from the bicipital groove and sheath while avoiding conversion to an open procedure. Further, suprapectoral tenodesis limits complications associated with an open distally based incision. Several studies have compared these techniques to tenotomy or open-subpectoral tenodesis. This is the first study to directly compare patient outcomes between intra-articular and suprapectoral bicep tenodeses. Methods: Retrospective review of patients undergoing intra-articular or suprapectoral arthroscopic biceps tenodesis from 2010 - 2015. Clinical outcomes were measured at set intervals post-operatively (3 months, 6 months, and 12 months) and compared to pre-operative scores. Outcome measures included short form-12, both physical (PSF) and mental (MSF) component scores, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES). Results: A total of 96 patients were available for this study, 43 had intra-articular tenodesis and 56 had suprapectoral tenodesis. There was no difference in functional outcomes between intra and extra articular biceps tenodesis at 1-year post-operative. The intra-articular group had a quicker improvement in scores with the greatest increase at 3 months post-operatively, specifically in PSF group (p=0.016): however, this difference leveled off at 1-year follow up (p=0.238). The intra-articular group had greater absolute scores at all measured time points, but not significantly. Both groups showed improvement in all outcome measures and there was found to be no difference in changes for ASES, PSF, or MSF (p=0.262, p=0.489, and p=0.907 respectively). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that both intra-articular and surpapectoral techniques are acceptable options for biceps tenodesis. Despite leaving the biceps tendon within the glenohumeral joint and intertubercular groove, the intra-articular technique offers similar improvement in outcome measures to the suprapectoral technique.

scholarly journals Subpectoral versus suprapectoral biceps tenodesis yields similar clinical outcomes: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. jisakos-2020-000543
Author(s):  
John W Belk ◽  
Stephen G Thon ◽  
John Hart ◽  
Eric C McCarty, Jr. ◽  
Eric C McCarty
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Biceps Brachii ◽  
Biceps Tendon ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Biceps Tenodesis ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Long Head

ImportanceArthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis (ABT) and open subpectoral biceps tenodesis (OBT) are two surgical treatment options for relief of long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) pathology and superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) tears. There is insufficient knowledge regarding the clinical superiority of one technique over the other.ObjectiveTo systematically review the literature in order to compare the clinical outcomes and safety of ABT and OBT for treatment of LHBT or SLAP pathology.Evidence reviewA systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase to identify studies that compared the clinical efficacy of ABT versus OBT. The search phrase used was: (bicep OR biceps OR biceps brachii OR long head of biceps brachii OR biceps tendinopathy) AND (tenodesis). Patients were assessed based on the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score, the visual analogue scale, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Constant-Murley Score, clinical failure, range of motion, bicipital groove pain and strength. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed, and both the Cochrane Collaboration’s and Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) risk of bias tools were used to evaluate risk of bias.FindingsEight studies (one level I, seven level III) met inclusion criteria, including 326 patients undergoing ABT and 381 patients undergoing OBT. No differences were found in treatment failure rates or patient-reported outcome scores between groups in any study. One study found OBT patients to experience significantly increased range of shoulder forward flexion when compared with ABT patients (p=0.049). Two studies found ABT patients to experience significantly more postoperative stiffness when compared with OBT patients (p<0.05).ConclusionsPatients undergoing ABT and OBT can be expected to experience similar improvements in clinical outcomes at latest follow-up without differences treatment failure or functional performance. ABT patients may experience an increased incidence of stiffness in the early postoperative period.Level of evidenceIII.

scholarly journals Applying the WHO ICF Framework to the Outcome Measures Used in the Evaluation of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Coronavirus Outbreaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (18) ◽  
pp. 6476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kajal Patel ◽  
Sofia Straudi ◽  
Ng Yee Sien ◽  
Nora Fayed ◽  
John L. Melvin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Short Form ◽  
World Health ◽  
Walking Distance ◽  
Personal Factors ◽  
Event Scale ◽  
Follow Up Studies ◽  
The Impact

(1) Objective: The World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) classification is a unified framework for the description of health and health-related states. This study aimed to use the ICF framework to classify outcome measures used in follow-up studies of coronavirus outbreaks and make recommendations for future studies. (2) Methods: EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycINFO were systematically searched for original studies assessing clinical outcomes in adult survivors of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (SARS), middle east respiratory syndrome (MERS) and coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) after hospital discharge. Individual items of the identified outcome measures were linked to ICF second-level and third-level categories using ICF linking rules and categorized according to an ICF component. (3) Results: In total, 33 outcome measures were identified from 36 studies. Commonly used (a) ICF body function measures were Pulmonary Function Tests (PFT), Impact of event scale (IES-R) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); (b) ICF activity was 6-Minute Walking Distance (6MWD); (c) ICF participation measures included Short Form-36 (SF-36) and St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). ICF environmental factors and personal factors were rarely measured. (4) Conclusions: We recommend future COVID-19 follow-up studies to use the ICF framework to select a combination of outcome measures that capture all the components for a better understanding of the impact on survivors and planning interventions to maximize functional return.

scholarly journals Measurements of Tendon Movement Within the Bicipital Groove After Suprapectoral Intra-articular Biceps Tenodesis in a Cadaveric Model

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 232596712097753
Author(s):  
Brian J. Kelly ◽  
Alan W. Reynolds ◽  
Patrick J. Schimoler ◽  
Alexander Kharlamov ◽  
Mark Carl Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biceps Tendon ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Elbow Flexion ◽  
Biceps Tenodesis ◽  
Bicipital Groove ◽  
Biceps Tenotomy ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Long Head ◽  
Scapular Motion

Background: Lesions of the long head of the biceps can be successfully treated with biceps tenotomy or tenodesis when surgical management is elected. The advantage of a tenodesis is that it prevents the potential development of a cosmetic deformity or cramping muscle pain. Proponents of a subpectoral tenodesis believe that “groove pain” may remain a problem after suprapectoral tenodesis as a result of persistent motion of the tendon within the bicipital groove. Purpose/Hypothesis: To evaluate the motion of the biceps tendon within the bicipital groove before and after a suprapectoral intra-articular tenodesis. The hypothesis was that there would be minimal to no motion of the biceps tendon within the bicipital groove after tenodesis. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Six fresh-frozen cadaveric arms were dissected to expose the long head of the biceps tendon as well as the bicipital groove. Inclinometers and fiducials (optical markers) were used to measure the motions of the scapula, forearm, and biceps tendon through a full range of shoulder and elbow motions. A suprapectoral biceps tenodesis was then performed, and the motions were repeated. The motion of the biceps tendon was quantified as a function of scapular or forearm motion in each plane, both before and after the tenodesis. Results: There was minimal motion of the native biceps tendon during elbow flexion and extension but significant motion during all planes of scapular motion before tenodesis, with the most motion occurring during shoulder flexion-extension (20.73 ± 8.21 mm). The motion of the biceps tendon after tenodesis was significantly reduced during every plane of scapular motion compared with the native state ( P < .01 in all planes of motion), with a maximum motion of only 1.57 mm. Conclusion: There was a statistically significant reduction in motion of the biceps tendon in all planes of scapular motion after the intra-articular biceps tenodesis. The motion of the biceps tendon within the bicipital groove was essentially eliminated after the suprapectoral biceps tenodesis. Clinical Relevance: This arthroscopic suprapectoral tenodesis technique can significantly reduce motion of the biceps tendon within the groove in this cadaveric study, possibly reducing the likelihood of groove pain in the clinical setting.

scholarly journals Long-term clinical outcomes after microfracture of the glenohumeral joint: minimum 8-year follow-up

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. S162-S163
Author(s):  
K.C. Wang ◽  
E.J. Cotter ◽  
R.M. Frank ◽  
A. Davey ◽  
C.P. Hannon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Glenohumeral Joint

Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis: Technique and Results in Six Dogs

2005 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L. Cook ◽  
Keith Kenter ◽  
Derek B. Fox
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Management ◽  
Biceps Tendon ◽  
Interference Screw ◽  
Cannulated Screw ◽  
Biceps Tenodesis ◽  
Fixation Methods ◽  
Feasible Option ◽  
Successful Outcomes ◽  
Tendon Pathology

Biceps tenodesis was performed using an arthroscopic-assisted technique on six dogs diagnosed with chronic bicipital tendon pathology. The technique was performed using two different fixation methods (i.e., cannulated interference screw, cannulated screw and tissue washer). All six dogs had successful outcomes in terms of return to full function at a mean follow-up time of 11.7 months after surgery. Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis is a feasible option for surgical management of biceps tendon pathology, and it may have advantages over open tenodesis and open or arthroscopic tenotomy. Further study is needed before definitive recommendations regarding indications, complications, and prognosis associated with arthroscopic biceps tenodesis can be made.

scholarly journals Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Clinical Outcomes in Children with Foregut Anomalies

Children ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 587
Author(s):  
Isabel I. Sreeram ◽  
Chantal A. ten Kate ◽  
Joost van Rosmalen ◽  
Johannes M. Schnater ◽  
Saskia J. Gischler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Linear Regression ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Patient Reported

Increasing numbers of children and adults with chronic disease status highlight the need for a value-based healthcare system. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential to value-based healthcare, yet it remains unclear how they relate to clinical outcomes such as health and daily functioning. We aimed to assess the added value of self-reported PROMs for health status (HS) and quality of life (QoL) in the long-term follow-up of children with foregut anomalies. We evaluated data of PROMs for HS and/or QoL among eight-year-olds born with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), esophageal atresia (EA), or congenital lung malformations (CLM), collected within the infrastructure of a multidisciplinary, longitudinal follow-up program. Clinical outcomes were categorized into different outcome domains, and their relationships with self-reported HS and QoL were assessed through multivariable linear regression analyses. A total of 220 children completed HS and/or QoL self-reports. In children with CDH and EA, lower cognition was significantly associated with lower self-reported HS. Due to the low number of cases, multivariable linear regression analysis was not possible in children with CLM. HS, QoL, and clinical outcomes represent different aspects of a child’s wellbeing and should be measured simultaneously to facilitate a more holistic approach to clinical decision making.

Effect of the Containment Type on Clinical Outcomes in Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus Treated With Autologous Osteochondral Transplantation

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (9) ◽  
pp. 2096-2102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiharu Shimozono ◽  
Johanna C.E. Donders ◽  
Youichi Yasui ◽  
Eoghan T. Hurley ◽  
Timothy W. Deyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Multivariate Regression ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Osteochondral Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Osteochondral Transplantation ◽  
Type Group

Background: Uncontained-type osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs) have been shown to have inferior clinical outcomes after treatment with bone marrow stimulation. While autologous osteochondral transplantation (AOT) is indicated for larger lesions, no study has reported on the prognostic significance of the containment of OLTs treated with the AOT procedure. Purpose: To clarify the effect of the containment of OLTs on clinical and radiological outcomes in patients who underwent AOT for OLTs. Study Design: Case control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective cohort study comparing patients with contained-type and uncontained-type OLTs was undertaken to include all patients who underwent AOT for the treatment of OLTs between 2006 and 2014. Analyses were performed by grouping the patients according to the containment type. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) preoperatively and at final follow-up. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 2 years’ follow-up was evaluated with the modified magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score. Multivariate regression models were used to evaluate factors affecting postoperative FAOS, SF-12, and MOCART scores. Results: Ninety-four patients were included: 31 patients with a contained-type OLT and 63 patients with an uncontained-type OLT. The median patient age was 34 years (interquartile range [IQR], 28-48 years) in the contained-type group and 36 years (IQR, 27-46 years) in the uncontained-type group. The median follow-up time was 45 months (IQR, 38-63 months) in the contained-type group and 52 months (IQR, 40-66 months) in the uncontained-type group. The median FAOS and SF-12 scores improved significantly after surgery in both contained-type and uncontained-type lesions ( P < .001). The median postoperative FAOS score of patients with contained-type OLTs was higher than that of patients with uncontained-type OLTs (91.7 vs 85.0, respectively; P = .009), but no significant differences were found between the contained-type and uncontained-type groups for postoperative SF-12 and MOCART scores. The multivariate regression models showed that patients with contained-type OLTs had an approximately 10-point better score on the FAOS compared with patients with uncontained-type OLTs ( P = .006). There was a nonsignificant trend for the rate of cystic occurrence in uncontained-type OLTs to be higher than that of contained-type OLTs (55.6% vs 38.7%, respectively; P = .125). Conclusion: Patients with contained-type OLTs experienced better clinical outcomes than those with uncontained-type OLTs after AOT for the treatment of OLTs. However, the AOT procedure still provided good clinical and MRI outcomes in both contained-type and uncontained-type OLTs at midterm follow-up.

scholarly journals Radiostereometric Analysis Of Biceps Tenodesis: A Comparison Of Techniques

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3_suppl2) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0012
Author(s):  
Kelechi Okoroha ◽  
Brandon J. Manderle ◽  
Alexander Beletsky ◽  
Adam Blair Yanke ◽  
Brian J. Cole ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Biceps Tendon ◽  
Similar Amount ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Biceps Tenodesis ◽  
Radiostereometric Analysis ◽  
Arthroscopic Technique ◽  
Distal Migration ◽  
Long Head ◽  
Anchor Fixation

Objectives: Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis (BT) is a common surgical procedure for treatment of anterior shoulder pain due to long head of the biceps pathology. BT can be accomplished via several different techniques. There continues to be a paucity of literature comparing the different techniques and fixation devices. The purpose of this study was to compare 4 different techniques for accomplishing a BT utilizing radiostereometric analysis. Methods: This study was a prospectively enrolled non-randomized trial of patients undergoing BT. All patients were treated at a single institution by 1 of 4 surgeons. Four different techniques were analyzed, 1) open BT with screw fixation, 2) open BT with single anchor fixation, 3) arthroscopic BT with screw fixation, and 4) arthroscopic BT with two suture anchor fixation. After the BT was completed a tantalum bead was sewn to the long head of the biceps tendon. This bead acted as a marker of the position of the biceps tendon. X-rays were taken during surgery while the patient remained sedated to establish time zero bead position. Follow up x-rays were completed at the patients 1st post-operative visit and 12 week post-operative visit. Position of the bead was measured at each time point in mm from the proximal most point of the humerus to its position distally. Results: A total of 60 patients were included in the analysis, with 15 patients in each of the 4 groups. Final bead position differed significantly for the open and arthroscopic techniques (107.35±20.39mm, 65.64±23.69mm, p<0.001), but did not differ significantly between the two open techniques and the two arthroscopic technique (p>0.05). The open technique resulted in 7.69±5.98mm of distal migration while the arthroscopic technique resulted in a similar amount of distal migration, 8.93±2.71mm. Conclusion: Short-term radiographic outcomes following open and arthroscopic biceps tenodesis revealed that each technique results in stable fixation of the tendon with minimal migration. Although a statistically significant migration occurred, this is likely clinically insignificant. This initial migration observed could be due to increased tensioning of the tendon when the patient is awake versus sedated.

Minimum 5-Year Outcomes and Return to Sports After Resection Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Sternoclavicular Osteoarthritis

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 715-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Travis J. Dekker ◽  
Lucca Lacheta ◽  
Brandon T. Goldenberg ◽  
Marilee P. Horan ◽  
Jonas Pogorzelski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Sports Participation ◽  
Resection Arthroplasty ◽  
Physical Component Score ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Articular Disk

Background: Osteoarthritis of the sternoclavicular (SC) joint is a rare condition that leads to decreased function and persistent pain, ultimately altering the function of the shoulder and keeping individuals from their desired activities. SC resection in the setting of primary and posttraumatic osteoarthritis is the most common surgical treatment for these patients, but midterm results are lacking. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to assess the clinical outcomes, pain levels, return to sports rate, and survivorship after open SC joint resection in the setting of painful primary SC joint osteoarthritis. We hypothesized that an SC joint resection of maximum 10 mm would result in a significant improvement in clinical outcomes, decreased pain levels, a high rate of return to sports, and a high survivorship. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients who underwent SC joint resection (maximum 10 mm) by a single surgeon between the years 2006 and 2013 with minimum 5-year follow-up were reviewed. The following clinical outcomes were collected prospectively during this time period: 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Score (SF-12 PCS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) score, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score, and patient satisfaction. Return to sports and pain were assessed through use of a customized questionnaire. Survivorship of SC joint resection was defined as not requiring further surgery on the affected joint. Results: A total of 21 SC joints were treated with resection of the medial clavicle and intra-articular disk and capsulorrhaphy for SC joint osteoarthritis in 19 patients with a mean age of 39.4 years (range, 12.5-66.7 years). At minimum 5-year follow-up, 19 SC joint resections were assessed in 16 of 19 patients (84%) with a mean follow-up of 6.7 years (range, 5.0-10.4 years). All outcome scores improved significantly from pre- to postoperative assessments: ASES (from 54 to 90.5; P = .003), SANE (from 61.8 to 90.4; P = .004), QuickDASH (from 43.1 to 13.8; P = .004), and SF-12 PCS (from 39.8 to 51.3; P = .004). Median satisfaction with surgical outcomes was 9 (range, 2-10), and pain levels improved from a score of 8 out of 10 to 3 out of 10 (scale of 0 to 10 with 0 being pain free and 10 worst possible pain). Of the 13 patients who answered the optional sports participation question, 13 (100%) patients had participated in sports before their injury. A total of 14 patients answered the question on sports participation after injury, with 12 (86%) indicating successful return to sports. Pain at its worst ( P = .003) and pain with competition ( P = .017) significantly decreased pre- to postoperatively. Resection survivorship at final follow-up was 84.2% at 5 years. We found that 3 patients (15%) had recurrent SC joint pain and were treated with revision surgery. Conclusion: Open SC resection arthroplasty with capsulorrhaphy in the setting of pain for SC osteoarthritis results in significant improvement in clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, return to sports, and pain reduction at minimum 5-year follow-up.

scholarly journals Shoulder biomechanics in normal and selected pathological conditions

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 508-518
Author(s):  
Patrick Goetti ◽  
Patrick J. Denard ◽  
Philippe Collin ◽  
Mohamed Ibrahim ◽  
Pierre Hoffmeyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Glenohumeral Joint ◽  
Biceps Tendon ◽  
Tendon Healing ◽  
Upward Migration ◽  
Superior Capsular Reconstruction ◽  
Long Head ◽  
Favourable Environment ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Cuff Repair

The stability of the glenohumeral joint depends on soft tissue stabilizers, bone morphology and dynamic stabilizers such as the rotator cuff and long head of the biceps tendon. Shoulder stabilization techniques include anatomic procedures such as repair of the labrum or restoration of bone loss, but also non-anatomic options such as remplissage or tendon transfers. Rotator cuff repair should restore the cuff anatomy, reattach the rotator cable and respect the coracoacromial arch whenever possible. Tendon transfer, superior capsular reconstruction or balloon implantation have been proposed for irreparable lesions. Shoulder rehabilitation should focus on restoring balanced glenohumeral and scapular force couples in order to avoid an upward migration of the humeral head and secondary cuff impingement. The primary goal of cuff repair is to be as anatomic as possible and to create a biomechanically favourable environment for tendon healing. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:508-518. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200006

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document