Twin Robotic X-Ray System for 3D Cone-Beam CT of the Wrist: An Evaluation of Image Quality and Radiation Dose

2020 ◽  
Vol 214 (2) ◽  
pp. 422-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-Peter Grunz ◽  
Carsten H. Gietzen ◽  
Andreas S. Kunz ◽  
Andreas M. Weng ◽  
Maike Veyhl-Wichmann ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 119 ◽  
pp. 108659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-Peter Grunz ◽  
Andreas Steven Kunz ◽  
Carsten Herbert Gietzen ◽  
Andreas Max Weng ◽  
Maike Veyhl-Wichmann ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-Peter Grunz ◽  
Carsten Herbert Gietzen ◽  
Andreas Steven Kunz ◽  
Maike Veyhl-Wichmann ◽  
Süleyman Ergün ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 20190495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Durer Iskanderani ◽  
Mats Nilsson ◽  
Per Alstergren ◽  
Xie-Qi Shi ◽  
Kristina Hellen-halme

Objective: Evaluation of cone beam CT (CBCT) examination with a low-dose scanning protocol for assessment of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Methods: 34 adult patients referred for CBCT imaging of the TMJ underwent two examinations with two scanning protocols, a manufacturer-recommended protocol (default) and a low-dose protocol where the tube current was reduced to 20% of the default protocol. Three image stacks were reconstructed: default protocol, low-dose protocol, and processed (using a noise reduction algorithm) low-dose protocol. Four radiologists evaluated the images. The Sign test was used to evaluate visibility of TMJ anatomic structures and image quality. Receiver operating characteristic analyzes were performed to assess the diagnostic accuracy. κ values were used to evaluate intraobserver agreement. Results: With the low-dose and processed protocols, visibility of the TMJ anatomical structures and overall image quality were comparable to the default protocol. No significant differences in radiographic findings were found for the two low-dose protocols compared to the default protocol. The area under the curves (Az) averaged for the low-dose and processed protocols, according to all observers, were 0.931 and 0.941, respectively. Intraobserver agreement was good to very good. Conclusion: For the CBCT unit used in this study, the low-dose CBCT protocol for TMJ examination was diagnostically comparable to the manufacturer-recommended protocol, but delivered a five times lower radiation dose. There is an urgent need to evaluate protocols for CBCT examinations of TMJ in order to optimize them for a radiation dose as low as diagnostically acceptable (the as low as diagnostically acceptable principle recommended by NCRP).


2010 ◽  
Vol 195 (2) ◽  
pp. 496-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avice O'Connell ◽  
David L. Conover ◽  
Yan Zhang ◽  
Posy Seifert ◽  
Wende Logan-Young ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-Peter Grunz ◽  
Andreas Max Weng ◽  
Andreas Steven Kunz ◽  
Maike Veyhl-Wichmann ◽  
Rainer Schmitt ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Elbow imaging is challenging with conventional multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), while cone-beam CT (CBCT) provides superior options. We compared intra-individually CBCT versus MDCT image quality in cadaveric elbows. Methods A twin robotic x-ray system with new CBCT mode and a high-resolution clinical MDCT were compared in 16 cadaveric elbows. Both systems were operated with a dedicated low-dose (LD) protocol (equivalent volume CT dose index [CTDIvol(16 cm)] = 3.3 mGy) and a regular clinical scan dose (RD) protocol (CTDIvol(16 cm) = 13.8 mGy). Image quality was evaluated by two radiologists (R1 and R2) on a seven-point Likert scale, and estimation of signal intensity in cancellous bone was conducted. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) statistics were used. Results The CBCT prototype provided superior subjective image quality compared to MDCT scans (for RD, p ≤ 0.004; for LD, p ≤ 0.001). Image quality was rated very good or excellent in 100% of the cases by both readers for RD CBCT, 100% (R1) and 93.8% (R2) for LD CBCT, 62.6% and 43.8% for RD MDCT, and 0.0% and 0.0% for LD MDCT. Single-measure ICC was 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.91–0.97; p < 0.001). Software-based assessment supported subjective findings with less “undecided” pixels in CBCT than dose-equivalent MDCT (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between LD CBCT and RD MDCT. Conclusions In cadaveric elbow studies, the tested cone-beam CT prototype delivered superior image quality compared to high-end multidetector CT and showed a potential for considerable dose reduction.


2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 4563-4574 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Schafer ◽  
S. Nithiananthan ◽  
D. J. Mirota ◽  
A. Uneri ◽  
J. W. Stayman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document