Understanding and Application of Dual Process Model and Meaning-Reconstruction Model About Bereavement

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 1181-1196
Author(s):  
Jisun Park
2015 ◽  
Vol 156 (39) ◽  
pp. 1569-1576
Author(s):  
Ágnes Csikós ◽  
Mónika Menyhért ◽  
Ildikó Radványi ◽  
Csilla Busa

Grief is a natural part of life and it is always individual. Researchers have tried and still try to develop different theories to interpret, explain, and approach this particular phenomenon. The aim of the authors was to review the theoretical literature of mourning and to present new bereavement theories for domestic professionals. From the first half of the 20th century until presently mourning theories have undergone significant changes. Today the determinant models includes the flexible, coping-oriented dual process model, meaning reconstruction model which focuses on the meaning making, and the model which focuses on the development after the loss. The authors conclude that experts, who work in the clinical area should know the prevailing theories of grief, because they encounter often with loss at work. The presented models may contribute to more efficient work, to better understanding of the mourning process and to a better support of families. Orv. Hetil., 2015, 156(39), 1569–1576.


2004 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather L. Servaty-Seib

The primary purpose of the present article is to provide an overview of three theories of mourning--The Dual Process Model of Coping with Bereavement, Meaning Reconstruction and Loss, and Attachment Theory and Loss: Revisited. These are linked both by their emphasis on the phenomenological and by ideas such as balance and flexibility. Connections are drawn between the mourning theories and counseling theories that are commonly employed by mental health counselors.


SPIEL ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-145
Author(s):  
Larissa Leonhard ◽  
Anne Bartsch ◽  
Frank M. Schneider

This article presents an extended dual-process model of entertainment effects on political information processing and engagement. We suggest that entertainment consumption can either be driven by hedonic, escapist motivations that are associated with a superficial mode of information processing, or by eudaimonic, truth-seeking motivations that prompt more elaborate forms of information processing. This framework offers substantial extensions to existing dual-process models of entertainment by conceptualizing the effects of entertainment on active and reflective forms of information seeking, knowledge acquisition and political participation.


2015 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 75-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Chun ◽  
Phillip R. Shaver ◽  
Omri Gillath ◽  
Andrew Mathews ◽  
Terrence D. Jorgensen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document