scholarly journals G protein-coupled estrogen receptor in GtoPdb v.2021.3

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward J. Filardo ◽  
Richard Neubig ◽  
Eric R. Prossnitz

The G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER, nomenclature as agreed by the NC-IUPHAR Subcommittee on the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor [25]) was identified following observations of estrogen-evoked cyclic AMP signalling in breast cancer cells [2], which mirrored the differential expression of an orphan 7-transmembrane receptor GPR30 [6]. There are observations of both cell-surface and intracellular expression of the GPER receptor [28, 33]. Selective agonist/ antagonists for GPER have been characterized [25]. Antagonists of the nuclear estrogen receptor, such as fulvestrant [11], tamoxifen [28, 33] and raloxifene [24], as well as the flavonoid 'phytoestrogens' genistein and quercetin [17], are agonists of GPER. A complete review of GPER pharmacology has been published [25]. The roles of GPER in physiological systems throughout the body (cardiovascular, metabolic, endocrine, immune, reproductive) and in cancer have also been reviewed [25, 26, 19, 16, 9]. The GPER-selective agonist G-1 is currently in Phase I/II clinical trials for cancer (NCT04130516).

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Filardo ◽  
Richard Neubig ◽  
Eric R. Prossnitz

The G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER, nomenclature as agreed by the NC-IUPHAR Subcommittee on the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor [24]) was identified following observations of estrogen-evoked cyclic AMP signalling in breast cancer cells [2], which mirrored the differential expression of an orphan 7-transmembrane receptor GPR30 [5]. There are observations of both cell-surface and intracellular expression of the GPER receptor [27, 32]. Selective agonist/ antagonists for GPER have been characterized [24]. Antagonists of the nuclear estrogen receptor, such as fulvestrant [10], tamoxifen [27, 32] and raloxifene [23], as well as the flavonoid 'phytoestrogens' genistein and quercetin [16], are agonists of GPER. A complete review of GPER pharmacology has been recently published [24]. The roles of GPER in physiological systems throughout the body (cardiovascular, metabolic, endocrine, immune, reproductive) and in cancer have also been reviewed [24, 25, 18, 15, 8].


2010 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 1184-1194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric A. Ariazi ◽  
Eugen Brailoiu ◽  
Smitha Yerrum ◽  
Heather A. Shupp ◽  
Michael J. Slifker ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Hahnefeld ◽  
Lisa Gruber ◽  
Nina Schömel ◽  
Caroline Fischer ◽  
Peter Mattjus ◽  
...  

AbstractIdentifying co-expression of lipid species is challenging, but indispensable to identify novel therapeutic targets for breast cancer treatment. Lipid metabolism is often dysregulated in cancer cells, and changes in lipid metabolism affect cellular processes such as proliferation, autophagy, and tumor development. In addition to mRNA analysis of sphingolipid metabolizing enzymes, we performed liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry analysis in three breast cancer cell lines. These breast cancer cell lines differ in estrogen receptor and G-protein coupled estrogen receptor 1 status. Our data show that sphingolipids and non-sphingolipids are strongly increased in SKBr3 cells. SKBr3 cells are estrogen receptor negative and G-protein coupled estrogen receptor 1 positive. Treatment with G15, a G-protein coupled estrogen receptor 1 antagonist, abolishes the effect of increased sphingolipid and non-sphingolipid levels in SKBr3 cells. In particular, ether lipids are expressed at much higher levels in cancer compared to normal cells and are strongly increased in SKBr3 cells. Our analysis reveals that this is accompanied by increased sphingolipid levels such as ceramide, sphingadiene-ceramide and sphingomyelin. This shows the importance of focusing on more than one lipid class when investigating molecular mechanisms in breast cancer cells. Our analysis allows unbiased screening for different lipid classes leading to identification of co-expression patterns of lipids in the context of breast cancer. Co-expression of different lipid classes could influence tumorigenic potential of breast cancer cells. Identification of co-regulated lipid species is important to achieve improved breast cancer treatment outcome.HighlightsLC-HRMS analysis allows identification of co-expression between lipid classesPutative co-expression of sphingolipid and non-sphingolipid classesEther lipids are strongly upregulated in SKBr3 cells (ER negative, GPER1 positive)


2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 969-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yin Li ◽  
Lutz Birnbaumer ◽  
Christina T. Teng

Abstract In selected tissues and cell lines, 17β-estradiol (E2) regulates the expression of estrogen-related receptor α (ERRα), a member of the orphan nuclear receptor family. This effect is thought to be mediated by the estrogen receptor α (ERα). However in the ERα- and ERβ-negative SKBR3 breast cancer cell line, physiological levels of E2 also stimulate ERRα expression. Here, we explored the molecular mechanism that mediates estrogen action in ER-negative breast cancer cells. We observed that E2, the ERα agonist, as well as the ERα antagonists ICI 182,780 and tamoxifen (TAM), a selective ER modulator, stimulate the transcriptional activity of the ERRα gene and increase the production of ERRα protein in SKBR3 cells. Moreover, the ERRα downstream target genes expression and cellular proliferation are also increased. We show further that the G protein-coupled receptor GPR30/GPER-1 (GPER-1) mediates these effects. The GPER-1 specific ligand G-1 mimics the actions of E2, ICI 182,780, and TAM on ERRα expression, and changing the levels of GPER-1 mRNA by overexpression or small interfering RNA knockdown affected the expression of ERRα accordingly. Utilizing inhibitors, we delineate a different downstream pathway for ER agonist and ER antagonist-triggered signaling through GPER-1. We also find differential histone acetylation and transcription factor recruitment at distinct nucleosomes of the ERRα promoter, depending on whether the cells are activated with E2 or with ER antagonists. These findings provide insight into the molecular mechanisms of GPER-1/ERRα-mediated signaling and may be relevant to what happens in breast cancer cells escaping inhibitory control by TAM.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document