scholarly journals Comparison of functional outcome of mini versus open carpal tunnel release: A prospective study

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2.1) ◽  
pp. 28-30
Author(s):  
Dr. Febin Ahamed PI ◽  
Dr. Jacob Eapen ◽  
Dr. Jacob IPE
2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 161
Author(s):  
ChandrashekaraChowdipalya Maliyappa ◽  
MulamoottilAbraham George ◽  
Bader SaidKhamis Al-Marboi

2006 ◽  
Vol 64 (3a) ◽  
pp. 596-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto S. Martins ◽  
Mario G. Siqueira ◽  
Hougelli Simplício

This prospective study evaluates the possible advantages of wrist imobilization after open carpal tunnel release comparing the results of two weeks immobilization and no immobilization. Fifty two patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome were randomly selected in two groups after open carpal tunnel release. In one group (A, n=26) the patients wore a neutral-position wrist splint continuosly for two weeks. In the other group (B, n=26) no wrist immobilization was used. Clinical assessment was done pre-operatively and at 2 weeks follow-up and included the two-point discrimination test at the second finger and two questionnaires as an outcome measurement of symptoms severity and intensity. All the patients presented improvement in the postoperative evaluations in the three analyzed parameters. There was no significant difference between the two groups for any of the outcome measurements at the final follow-up. We conclude that wrist immobilization in the immediate post-operative period have no advantages when compared with no immobilization in the end result of carpal tunnel release.


2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
NMS Pradhan ◽  
JA Khan ◽  
BM Acharya ◽  
P Devkota ◽  
A Rajbhandari

BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral entrapment neuropathy and is manifested by characteristic signs and symptoms resulting from median nerve compression at the carpal tunnel. The diagnosis is essentially clinical, which is further confirmed by nerve conduction studies. Surgical release of the transverse carpal ligament is advised when conservative treatment fails.  METHODS: This prospective study evaluates the outcome of standard open carpal tunnel release performed at our center* from June 2004 to July 2007. Thirty two patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome, with failed conservative treatments, either with NSAIDs and/or local infiltration with corticosteroid injections plus night splint, or recurrence after conservative treatment were subjected to open carpal tunnel release after getting approval from the local ethical committee and getting a written and informed consent from the patient. Clinical assessment was done preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months following the procedure and included the two-point discrimination test at the tip of the index finger and Boston questionnaires as an outcome measurement of symptoms severity. All the patients were followed up for a period of six months. RESULTS: All the patients presented improvement in the postoperative evaluations in all the analyzed parameters. CONCLUSION: Open carpal tunnel release is a safe and effective method for the treatment of CTS and can be carried out when the conservative means fail to relieve the symptoms. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/noaj.v1i1.8129 Nepal Orthopaedic Association Journal Vol.1(1) 2010


2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
pp. S56-S57
Author(s):  
Malin Zimmerman ◽  
Katarina Eeg-Olofsson ◽  
Ann-Marie Svensson ◽  
Marianne Arner ◽  
Lars B. Dahlin

Hand Surgery ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 08 (02) ◽  
pp. 283-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Bradley ◽  
Edward P. Hayes ◽  
Arnold-Peter C. Weiss ◽  
Edward Akelman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document