Bilateral simultaneous open carpal tunnel release: a prospective study of postoperative activities of daily living and patient satisfaction

2003 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 845-848 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela A Wang ◽  
Douglas T Hutchinson ◽  
J.Eric Vanderhooft
2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 161
Author(s):  
ChandrashekaraChowdipalya Maliyappa ◽  
MulamoottilAbraham George ◽  
Bader SaidKhamis Al-Marboi

2006 ◽  
Vol 64 (3a) ◽  
pp. 596-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto S. Martins ◽  
Mario G. Siqueira ◽  
Hougelli Simplício

This prospective study evaluates the possible advantages of wrist imobilization after open carpal tunnel release comparing the results of two weeks immobilization and no immobilization. Fifty two patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome were randomly selected in two groups after open carpal tunnel release. In one group (A, n=26) the patients wore a neutral-position wrist splint continuosly for two weeks. In the other group (B, n=26) no wrist immobilization was used. Clinical assessment was done pre-operatively and at 2 weeks follow-up and included the two-point discrimination test at the second finger and two questionnaires as an outcome measurement of symptoms severity and intensity. All the patients presented improvement in the postoperative evaluations in the three analyzed parameters. There was no significant difference between the two groups for any of the outcome measurements at the final follow-up. We conclude that wrist immobilization in the immediate post-operative period have no advantages when compared with no immobilization in the end result of carpal tunnel release.


2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
NMS Pradhan ◽  
JA Khan ◽  
BM Acharya ◽  
P Devkota ◽  
A Rajbhandari

BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral entrapment neuropathy and is manifested by characteristic signs and symptoms resulting from median nerve compression at the carpal tunnel. The diagnosis is essentially clinical, which is further confirmed by nerve conduction studies. Surgical release of the transverse carpal ligament is advised when conservative treatment fails.  METHODS: This prospective study evaluates the outcome of standard open carpal tunnel release performed at our center* from June 2004 to July 2007. Thirty two patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome, with failed conservative treatments, either with NSAIDs and/or local infiltration with corticosteroid injections plus night splint, or recurrence after conservative treatment were subjected to open carpal tunnel release after getting approval from the local ethical committee and getting a written and informed consent from the patient. Clinical assessment was done preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months following the procedure and included the two-point discrimination test at the tip of the index finger and Boston questionnaires as an outcome measurement of symptoms severity. All the patients were followed up for a period of six months. RESULTS: All the patients presented improvement in the postoperative evaluations in all the analyzed parameters. CONCLUSION: Open carpal tunnel release is a safe and effective method for the treatment of CTS and can be carried out when the conservative means fail to relieve the symptoms. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/noaj.v1i1.8129 Nepal Orthopaedic Association Journal Vol.1(1) 2010


2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
pp. S56-S57
Author(s):  
Malin Zimmerman ◽  
Katarina Eeg-Olofsson ◽  
Ann-Marie Svensson ◽  
Marianne Arner ◽  
Lars B. Dahlin

Hand Surgery ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 08 (02) ◽  
pp. 283-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Bradley ◽  
Edward P. Hayes ◽  
Arnold-Peter C. Weiss ◽  
Edward Akelman

Hand ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 155894472094006
Author(s):  
Rachel E. Hein ◽  
Andrew W. Hollins ◽  
Amanda N. Fletcher ◽  
David S. Ruch ◽  
Marc J. Richard ◽  
...  

Background Approximately 56% of patients diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome present with bilateral symptoms; however, few studies have investigated bilateral simultaneous endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) and postoperative effect on return to activity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the length of recovery in patients who received bilateral simultaneous ECTR, including pain medication requirements, return to activities of daily living, return to work, and return to recreational activities. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent bilateral ECTR by a single hand fellowship–trained surgeon from 2013 to 2019. Demographic, operative, and clinical outcomes were collected via chart review and a telephone interview. Student t tests and χ2 tests were conducted for analysis. Results Eighty patients were included in the study; 40 were successfully contacted for telephone interview follow-up. Patients reported an average of 2 days of use of postoperative narcotic pain medication and an average of 5, 7, and 19 days of return to activities of daily living, work, and recreational activities, respectively. Female patients reported more days of narcotic pain medications (1 day vs 3 days, P = .0483) and an average of longer return to work than men (9 days vs 5 days, P = .0477). Manual laborers reported longer return to work (9 days vs 5 days, P = .0500). Older patients (aged >65 years) reported longer return to recreational activities (39 days vs 11 days, P = .0189). Conclusions Simultaneous bilateral ECTR is a successful procedure with shorter recovery times than reported previously. Female patients, manual laborers, and older patients experience a longer recovery and should be counseled appropriately.


2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santiago A. Lozano Calderón ◽  
Alex Paiva ◽  
David Ring

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document