scholarly journals COGNITION AND NATURAL PHILOSOPHY IN THE 21ST CENTURY

Metaphysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 118-127
Author(s):  
A. P Yefremov

With an emphasis on the trends related to the development of the Earth’s civilization in recent decades, the demographic rise and total digitalization, the existing and promising approaches to the formation of the processes of cognition of natural-scientific and social laws are discussed.

Philosophy ◽  
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonia LoLordo

In 21st century academic philosophy, “early modern philosophy” refers to the study of texts written in a specific time and place, and understood as works of philosophy in that context. The time is, roughly, the 17th century and the first half of the 18th century. This article is limited to philosophers who published or wrote most of their major works between 1600 and 1750, thus including Hume and Condillac but omitting near-contemporaries like Rousseau. The place is often described as Western Europe, but this is a bit misleading: with very few exceptions, the philosophers discussed here were from France, Holland, or what is now the United Kingdom. The traditional canon of Early Modern philosophers was very small: Locke, Berkeley, and Hume on one side of the English Channel; Descartes, Leibniz, and Spinoza on the other. In the last decades of the 20th century and first decades of the 21st century, the canon was expanded significantly. Two main factors drove the expansion of the canon. One was increased attention to works of what was then called natural philosophy, like Newton’s Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica. The other was increased attention to the work of women. This bibliography aims to capture some of this expansion, but still, hundreds of other works could have been included—and more will be as time goes on.


Philosophy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Detlefsen

Emilie Du Châtelet (b. 1706–d. 1749) was a French philosopher, author, and translator who worked primarily in natural philosophy, but also wrote on language, produced Biblical criticism, tackled questions surrounding virtue and happiness, and grappled with the nature of liberty given her understanding of the physical world and of God. She wrote and published, in her lifetime, on fire (having conducted a range of experiments on the topic at her family’s estate at Cirey), on natural philosophy more generally, and on the vis viva controversy. Much of her work was published posthumously, including work on optics, happiness, the Bible, language, and Newtonian philosophy. She was an avid translator, often developing her own original positions in her liberal changes made to texts in translation. This is especially true of her translation of Mandeville’s Fable of the Bees. Her translation of Newton’s Principia was the first translation into French of that work and remains the standard translation to this day. Having received training from many top mathematicians of her day, Du Châtelet’s own mathematical skills were notable, contributing to her facility in translating and discussing Newton’s work. She had a notable impact on European intellectual life during her lifetime, and in the form of several articles in the Encyclopédie, drawn often verbatim from her oeuvres. After falling largely into obscurity for the better part of two centuries, her thought has been revived across the globe, and 21st-century attention paid to this remarkable thinker has been especially robust. Her masterwork, The Foundations of Physics, addressed questions of method; metaphysics (for example, the nature of substance and body, and God’s existence and nature); and physics. She engaged especially with the works of Descartes, Leibniz, Wolff, and Newton, carving out original philosophical positions on a range of topics in natural philosophy. Her arguments for the nature and existence of God are also attuned to the contributions of Locke. In this text, as well as others, she engaged with Jean-Jacques Dortous de Mairan—then Secretary of the Académie Royale des Sciences—in a heated debate about vis viva, with Mairan taking the Cartesian position, and Du Châtelet arguing for the Leibnizian side. This extended exchange allowed Du Châtelet to engage with one of the most powerful men in science in mid-18th-century France, a significant feat given her exclusion from the Académie due to her gender. She collaborated or conversed with Voltaire, Francesco Algarotti, Pierre-Louis Moreau de Maupertuis, and Alexis-Claude Clairaut, among others, and her correspondents included Maupertuis, Algarotti, and Johann Bernoulli.


ASHA Leader ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (14) ◽  
pp. 24-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria D. Kellum ◽  
Sue T. Hale

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 400-400
Author(s):  
Mark R. Young ◽  
Andrew R. Bullock ◽  
Rafael Bouet ◽  
John A. Petros ◽  
Muta M. Issa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document