scholarly journals Caveat WACC: Pitfalls in the use of the weighted average cost of capital

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 45-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Lobe
Keyword(s):  
Cash Flow ◽  
Average Cost ◽  
Cost Of Capital ◽  
Weighted Average ◽  
Time Varying ◽  
Discounted Cash Flow ◽  
Leverage Ratio

In Discounted Cash Flow valuations, the WACC approach is very popular. Therefore, knowing which limitations the concept inherits is essential. The objective of this paper is thus twofold: First, it is clarified that a constant WACC rate must fail if the implied leverage ratio is time-varying. This seems to be the rationale for defining a nonlinear WACC (NLWACC). However, the NLWACC appears to be rather artificial when allowing for time-varying WACCs. Second, although the NLWACC approach is further amplified in this paper, it must be emphasized that this approach is, even then, applicable only under specific conditions while a time-varying WACC is still able to provide reliable results. In conclusion, the WACC approach is a valid workhorse whose results can be economically interpreted.

A Comparison of the Weighted-Average Cost of Capital and Equity-Residual Approaches to Valuation

2017 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Robert S. Harris
Keyword(s):  
Cash Flow ◽  
Average Cost ◽  
Cost Of Capital ◽  
Weighted Average ◽  
Technical Note ◽  
Discounted Cash Flow ◽  
Investment Projects ◽  
Discounted Cash Flow Valuation

This technical note compares two methods of treating debt usage in discounted-cash-flow valuation of investment projects or companies. The note demonstrates that the approach using weighted average cost of capital (WACC) and the approach using equity residual (ER) yield equivalent results if consistent assumptions are used. General features are illustrated with specific examples, including a spreadsheet.

Application of discounted cash flow model valuation: The case of Excide industries

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 170-179
Author(s):  
Ashok Panigrahi ◽  
Kushal Vachhani ◽  
Mohit Sisodia
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Cash Flow ◽  
Flow Model ◽  
Cost Of Capital ◽  
Weighted Average ◽  
The Other ◽  
Discounted Cash Flow ◽  
Worst Case ◽  
Share Prices ◽  
Valuation Technique

Theoretical and practical features of the widely used discounted cash flow (DCF) valuation approach are examined in depth in this paper. This research evaluates Exide Industries by using the DCF Valuation technique. It is widely accepted that the discounted cash flow approach is an effective tool for analyzing the situation of an organization even in the most complicated circumstances. The DCF approach, on the other hand, is prone to huge assumption bias, and even little modifications in an analysis' underlying assumptions may substantially affect the valuation findings. As a result, of the sensitivity analysis, we discovered bullish, base, and worst-case scenarios with target share prices of Rs. 253.25, Rs. 171.37, and Rs.133.25, respectively, by adjusting growth and WACC (Weighted-Average Cost of Capital) values.

LA FUSIÓN CARULLA-VIVERO, ¿CREÓ VALOR?

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Andrés Villegas Cortés ◽  
Luz Ángela Rojas La Rota
Keyword(s):  
Average Cost ◽  
Cost Of Capital ◽  
Economic Value ◽  
Weighted Average ◽  
Value Added ◽  
Economic Value Added ◽  
Estudio De Caso

El presente trabajo busca determinar si la fusión de las empresas Carulla-Vivero ocurrida en el año 2000 generó valor. Para esto, se estudia el conceptode valor, posteriormente se explica el estudio de caso como metodología deinvestigación para concluir con la exposición del caso mismo de la fusión, ysu resultado. Una vez realizado el análisis de las dos empresas, se hace unacomparación y una valoración por dos metodologías ampliamente aceptadas:los métodos Economic Value Added (EVA) - Weighted Average Cost of Capital(WACC) y Flujo de Caja Histórico, con lo cual se explora en su interior la fusióny se explican los resultados obtenidos en ella. Finalmente, se hace una seriede observaciones, conclusiones y recomendaciones sobre la fusión, asícomo de la metodología del estudio de caso, para el abordaje de temas de laadministración.

Profitability, risk and cash flow deficit for beginning cow–calf producers

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos J.O. Trejo-Pech ◽  
Jared Bruhin ◽  
Christopher N. Boyer ◽  
S. Aaron Smith
Keyword(s):  
Cash Flow ◽  
Opportunity Cost ◽  
Net Present Value ◽  
Cost Of Capital ◽  
Herd Size ◽  
Discounted Cash Flow ◽  
Production Risk ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Market Values ◽  
Cow Calf

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to estimate the amount of cash flow deficit, if any, needed to maintain the operating costs and service debt of a startup cow–calf enterprise. The study compares long-term profitability and risk between starting small and building a herd to full carrying capacity or by starting at desired herd capacity.Design/methodology/approachA dynamic cattle growth model was developed to capture expanding and maintaining the desired herd size. Discounted cash flow (DCF) models over a 15-year period were calculated to estimate net present value (NPV), modified internal rate of return (MIRR) and cash flow deficit to keep the business operating and service debt. Simulation analyses were conducted considering price and production risk.FindingsStarting at the desired herd size was preferred, according to NPV/MIRR and cash flow deficit, but the differences were not substantial. Assuming the operation is liquidated at book values, there was a 36.3% probability of this enterprise having a zero or positive NPV. If the conservative terminal value assumption is relaxed up to feasible market values, the cow–calf enterprise is economically attractive at an estimated 2.4% opportunity cost of capital. However, the producer would experience a cash flow deficit during the first seven years, which was simulated to be $14,892 and $15,985 annual for both strategies.Originality/valueInnovative methods used in this study include varying the annual opportunity cost of capital as a function of financing decisions, stochastic prices by cattle type and stochastic weaning weights that are a function of a dynamic cattle model.

The Weighted Average Cost of Capital for the Analysis of Innovative Projects Integrated into the Company

2021 ◽  
pp. 103-111
Author(s):  
Sergey N. Yashin ◽  
Egor V. Koshelev ◽  
Natalya A. Yagunova ◽  
Victor P. Kuznetsov ◽  
Elena V. Romanovskaya
Keyword(s):  
Average Cost ◽  
Cost Of Capital ◽  
Weighted Average
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document