scholarly journals Commentary on: Tissue “valve-over-valve” implantation in previous mechanical Bentall

Author(s):  
Mohammed Hassan
2008 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 632-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sven Dittrich ◽  
Martin Gloeckler ◽  
Raoul Arnold ◽  
Koppany Sarai ◽  
Matthias Siepe ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
N. V. Rogulina ◽  
I. K. Khalivopulo

Every year, the frequency of use of biological prostheses for treatment of valvular heart disease increases.The implantation of a biological prosthesis allows avoiding lifelong anticoagulant therapy, but at the same time it may require further replacement due to the dysfunction development.Traditional reoperation is associated with a certain risk of trauma to various structures and cardiac chambers during explantation of non-functioning valve.Transcatheter replacement of the prosthesis (“valve-in-valve”) is not always realizable due to lack of routes for the delivery system and small diameter of the initial valve.“Valve-in-valve” is not always demanded because it does not provide an option to choose mechanical or biological prosthesis.Valve-on-valve implantation technique implies that the new prosthesis is implanted in the carcass of the previous valve. It allows avoiding severe intraoperative complications, reducing the duration of the main stage of the surgery and adverse events in the early postoperative period, and provide an option to choose implantable device.In this review, the authors attempted to comprehensively evaluate the world experience in applying the “valve-on-valve” technique.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 3645-3647
Author(s):  
Ngozichukwuka L. E. Okiwelu ◽  
Fabio Ramponi ◽  
Sameer Thakur ◽  
Tovi Vo ◽  
James Edwards

2017 ◽  
Vol 69 (11) ◽  
pp. 1307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith B. Allen ◽  
Adnan Chhatriwalla ◽  
David Cohen ◽  
Sanjeev Aggarwal ◽  
Suzanne Baron ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 148-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Bolling ◽  
Jason Rogers ◽  
Vasilis Babaliaros ◽  
Nicolo Piazza ◽  
Patricia Takeda ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (15) ◽  
pp. 3209
Author(s):  
Manuel Carnero-Alcázar ◽  
Emiliano Rodríguez-Caulo ◽  
Daniel Hernández-Vaquero ◽  
Lourdes Montero-Cruces ◽  
Daniel Perez-Camargo ◽  
...  

Background: There is no robust evidence regarding the types of valves implanted among patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in Spain. Methods: All cases of patients undergoing SAVR ± coronary artery bypass grafting from January 2007 to December 2018 in the public Spanish National Health System were included. We analyzed the trends of SAVR volume, risk profile and type of implanted valve across time and place. Using multivariable logistic regression, we identified factors associated with biological SAVR. Results: In total, 62,870 episodes of SAVR in 15 Spanish territories were included. In 35,693 (56.8%), a tissue valve was implanted. The annual volume of procedures increased from 107.3/million (2007) to 128.6 (2017). In 2018, it fell to 108.5. Age increased and Charlson’s comorbity index worsened throughout the study period. Tissue valve implantation increased in most regions. After adjusting for other covariates, we observed a high variability in aortic valve implantation across different regions, with differences of as much as 20-fold in the use of tissue valves. Conclusions: Between 2007 and 2018, we detected a significant increase in the use of bioprostheses in patients undergoing SAVR in Spain, and a great variability in the types of valve between the Spanish territories, which was not explained by the different risk profiles of patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document