scholarly journals Risk factors for complications of implantable venous access port usage among young pediatric patients with a solid tumor in China: a single-center retrospective study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shanshan Qiu ◽  
Ming Hu ◽  
Ping Guan ◽  
Chenchen Li ◽  
Nan Bao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Access Port ◽  
Venous Access Port

Risk Factors for Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Port-related Infection in Patients With Malignancy

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 1547-1553
Author(s):  
SATORU FURUHASHI ◽  
YOSHIFUMI MORITA ◽  
SHINYA IDA ◽  
RYUTA MURAKI ◽  
RYO KITAJIMA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Central Venous Access ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Access Port ◽  
Venous Access Port

IR Approaches to Difficult Removals of Totally Implanted Venous Access Port Catheters in Children: A Single-Center Experience

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 876-881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Premal Amrishkumar Patel ◽  
Dimitri A. Parra ◽  
Ramnik Bath ◽  
Joao G. Amaral ◽  
Michael J. Temple ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Access ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Access Port ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Venous Access Port ◽  
Port Catheters

scholarly journals Totally implantable venous access port insertion via open Seldinger approach of the internal jugular vein—a retrospective risk stratification of 500 consecutive patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Becker ◽  
Lennart A. Wurche ◽  
Martina Darscht ◽  
Andreas Pascher ◽  
Benjamin Struecker
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Internal Jugular Vein ◽  
Jugular Vein ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Access Port ◽  
Oncological Treatment ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Venous Access Port

Abstract Purpose Modern oncological treatment algorithms require a central venous device in form of a totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP). While most commonly used techniques are surgical cutdown of the cephalic vein or percutaneous puncture of the subclavian vein, there are a relevant number of patients in which an additional strategy is needed. The aim of the current study is to present a surgical technique for TIVAP implantation via an open Seldinger approach of the internal jugular vein and to characterize risk factors, associated with primary failure as well as short- (< 30 days) and long-term (> 30 days) complications. Methods A total of 500 patients were included and followed up for 12 months. Demographic and intraoperative data and short- as well as long-term complications were extracted. Primary endpoint was TIVAP removal due to complication. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze associated risk factors. Results Surgery was primarily successful in all cases, while success was defined as functional (positive aspiration and infusion test) TIVAP which was implanted via open Seldinger approach of the jugular vein at the intended site. TIVAP removal due to complications during the 1st year occurred in 28 cases (5.6%) while a total of 4 (0.8%) intraoperative complications were noted. Rates for short- and long-term complications were 0.8% and 6.6%, respectively. Conclusion While the presented technique requires relatively long procedure times, it is a safe and reliable method for TIVAP implantation. Our results might help to further introduce the presented technique as a secondary approach in modern TIVAP surgery.

scholarly journals Analysis of risk factors for implantable venous access port catheter fracture with internal jugular vein

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ning Ai ◽  
Li Li ◽  
Fenghua Yin ◽  
Zhigang Li ◽  
Cuizhi Geng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Internal Jugular Vein ◽  
Jugular Vein ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Port Catheter ◽  
Access Port ◽  
Venous Access Port ◽  
Catheter Fracture

scholarly journals Incidence and risk factors for central venous access port-related infection in Chinese cancer patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 114 (11) ◽  
pp. 1055-1060 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting-Yao Wang ◽  
Kuan-Der Lee ◽  
Ping-Tsung Chen ◽  
Min-Chi Chen ◽  
Yi-Yang Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Central Venous Access ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Access Port ◽  
Venous Access Port ◽  
Chinese Cancer Patients

Risk factors for central line-associated bloodstream infection in pediatric oncology patients with a totally implantable venous access port: A cohort study

2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 336-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Ribeiro Viana Taveira ◽  
Luciana Santana Lima ◽  
Cláudia Corrêa de Araújo ◽  
Maria Júlia Gonçalves de Mello
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Pediatric Oncology ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Oncology Patients ◽  
Access Port ◽  
Venous Access Port

scholarly journals Totally implantable venous access port systems and risk factors for complications: A one-year prospective study in a cancer centre

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (10) ◽  
pp. 913-918 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Narducci ◽  
M. Jean-Laurent ◽  
L. Boulanger ◽  
S. El Bédoui ◽  
Y. Mallet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Access Port ◽  
Cancer Centre ◽  
Port Systems ◽  
Venous Access Port ◽  
One Year

Experience with implanted venous access ports between 2005 and 2012

2014 ◽  
Vol 155 (25) ◽  
pp. 986-992
Author(s):  
Erika Kovács ◽  
Edit Deme ◽  
Gábor Bencsik
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Underlying Disease ◽  
Optimal Time ◽  
Access Port ◽  
Venous Port ◽  
Venous Access Port

Introduction: During chemotherapy of cancer patients, vein inflammation may develop which may lead to pain and difficulty in blood sampling. The use of implanted venous access ports may overcome these problems. With a correct use of needles, venous port membrane may be pierced 2000–2500 times. Aim: The aim of the authors was to analyze their experience with venous access ports and evaluate whether insertion of venous ports occurred in an optimal time. Method: A retrospective study of 63 patients who received venous access ports between 2005 and 2012 was carried out. Complication rate and the time of venous port insertion were analysed. Results: Of the 63 patients, the venous access port was removed in 22 patients because it was no longer required (n = 14) due to the development of complications (n = 8). 24 patients died from the underlying disease and 17 patients are still alive with the venous port in place. Conclusions: In the period studied patients with venous access ports had an improved quality of life. However, the authors conclude that venous access ports were not inserted in an optimal time. Orv. Hetil., 2014, 155(25), 986–992.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document