scholarly journals The association between factor V Leiden, MTHFR C667t/A1298c polymorphisms and pregnancy outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 125 (4) ◽  
pp. 563-569
Author(s):  
Petronela Vicoveanu ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. S390.2-S390
Author(s):  
M. Haque ◽  
D. Aregawi ◽  
C. J. Glueck ◽  
T. Tracy ◽  
P. Wang

2007 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 071119224223005-??? ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Clark ◽  
Isobel D. Walker ◽  
Lindsay Govan ◽  
Olivia Wu ◽  
Ian A. Greer

2000 ◽  
Vol 264 (3) ◽  
pp. 164-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.-U. Pauer ◽  
J. Neesen ◽  
M. Schloesser ◽  
B. Hinney ◽  
R. Rauskolb

Author(s):  
Sidra Asad Ali ◽  
Bushra Moiz ◽  
Lumaan Sheikh

Abstract Objective: To determine the association of Factor V Leiden / prothrombin gene mutation in Pakistani women with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Method: The prospective study was conducted at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, from January 1 to December 31, 2016, and comprised females ?40 years having history of two or more foetal losses with no apparent aetiology. Restriction fragment length polymorphism- Polymerase chain reaction was performed using MnlI and HindIII restriction enzymes for factor V Leiden G1691A and prothrombin gene mutation G20210A. Females with two or more consecutive normal pregnancies were enrolled as the control group. Data was analysed using SPSS 19. Results: Of the 172 participants with a mean age of 29.3±5.9 years (range: 19-38 years). 86(50%) each were healthy controls and those with recurrent pregnancy loss. There were 238 livebirths among the controls compared to 13 in the other group. Factor V Leiden G1691A was identified in 2(2.3%) women, and prothrombin gene mutation G20210A in 1(1.2%) woman in the patient group, while no mutation was identified in the control group. Conclusion: The prevalence of Factor V Leiden / prothrombin gene mutation in women with recurrent pregnancy loss was found to be very low. Continuous....


2004 ◽  
Vol 91 (04) ◽  
pp. 700-711 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Attia ◽  
Tracy Dudding

SummaryThe conclusions of studies to date which evaluate a possible association between factor V Leiden and adverse pregnancy outcome have been conflicting. This study was undertaken to further investigate this association. Our objective was to evaluate the association between adverse pregnancy outcomes and maternal factor V Leiden genotype by meta-analysis. Inclusion criteria were: (a) cohort or case control design; (b) outcomes clearly defined as one of the following: first or second/ third trimester miscarriage or intrauterine death, preeclampsia, fetal growth retardation, or placental abruption; (c) both the case and control mothers tested for the factor V Leiden mutation; (d) sufficient data for calculation of an odds ratio. Both fixed and random effect models were used to pool results and heterogeneity and publication bias were checked. For first trimester fetal loss, the pooled odds ratio was heterogeneous (p=0.06) and no dose-response curve could be found. For second/third trimester fetal loss, there was a consistent and graded increase in risk: the odds ratio was 2.4 (95% CI 1.1-5.2) for isolated (non-recurrent) third trimester fetal loss, rising to 10.7 (95% CI 4.0-28.5) for those with 2 or more second/third trimester fetal losses. FactorV Leiden is associated with a 2.9 fold (95% CI 2.0-4.3) increased risk of severe preeclampsia, and a 4.8 fold (95% CI 2.4-9.4) increased risk of fetal growth retardation. These results support factor V Leiden testing for women with recurrent fetal loss in the second/third trimester. Women with only 1 event may also warrant testing if the fetal loss occurred in the third trimester. Conversely, in those women known to have the factor V Leiden mutation, monitoring for adverse pregnancy outcomes is warranted; whether this means increased vigilance or anti-coagulant prophylaxis is still contentious.


2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (6) ◽  
pp. 1249-1253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Biron-Andréani ◽  
Anne Bauters ◽  
Véronique Le Cam-Duchez ◽  
Bénédicte Delahousse ◽  
Agnès Lequerrec ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-79
Author(s):  
Donna Dizon-Townson ◽  
Connie Miller ◽  
Baha Sibai ◽  
Catherine Y. Spong ◽  
Elizabeth Thom ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document