scholarly journals Using sowing date modification and genetic resistance to manage sunflower broomrape (Orobanche cumana Wallr.)

Helia ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (59) ◽  
pp. 17-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Akhtouch ◽  
L. Molinero-Ruiz ◽  
J. Dominguez ◽  
J.M. Melero-Vara ◽  
J.M. Fernández-Martínez
Sunflower ◽  
2015 ◽  
pp. 129-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
José M. Fernández-Martínez ◽  
Begoña Pérez-Vich ◽  
Leonardo Velasco

Weed Science ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 279-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanan Eizenberg ◽  
Joseph Hershenhorn ◽  
Dina Plakhine ◽  
Yeshaiahu Kleifeld ◽  
Danny Shtienberg ◽  
...  

Plant Disease ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. X. Shi ◽  
G. H. Chen ◽  
Z. J. Zhang ◽  
J. J. Hao ◽  
L. Jing ◽  
...  

Sunflower broomrape (Orobanche cumana Wallr.) is a holoparasitic plant that penetrates the vascular system of sunflower roots, absorbs plant nutrients and water, and thus causes stunting, reduced growth, and severe yield losses (3). To date, seven races of sunflower broomrape (O. cumana) have been identified by using international standard race differential hosts in Bulgaria, Serbia, Romania, Turkey, and Russia (4). However, the race types present in China are unknown. To identify the race composition of sunflower broomrape in China, race differential hosts of sunflower broomrape were received from Dr. Dragan Skoric (Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Novi Sad, Serbia): Line AD66 has no resistant genes; Kruglik-41 contains resistant gene Or1; B-RO-02A has Or2; Record has Or3; LC1002B has Or4; LC1003B has Or5; LC-1093 has Or6, and Race-G-2 has Or7 (1). Eighteen sunflower broomrape samples were collected in August of 2011, 2012, and 2013 from different provinces/locations in China, including Xinjiang (Xinyuan, Shihezi, Tekesi, Beitun, Urumqi, and Yining), Inner Mongolia (Linhe, Xixiaozhao, Wuqianqi, Tuzuoqi, Keyouqianqi, and Aohanqi), Shanxi (Hunyuan, Shilou, Mizhi, and Dingbian), Jilin (Tongyu), and Hebei (Xuanhua). The differential hosts were each inoculated with the seeds of each broomrape isolate that was recovered, as described by Pancenko with minor modification (2). Briefly, two parts of field soil and one part of vermiculite were mixed together and used as potting mix. The mix was inoculated with broomrape seeds at 10 mg of seeds per 100 g of potting mix. The inoculated mix was placed in a 7-cm (diameter) × 11-cm (height) plastic pot to fill two-thirds of the pot volume. Three sunflower seeds were placed on the surface of the mix at an even distance from each other and covered with additional mix. The pots were kept in a greenhouse under a 16-h photoperiod at 10,000 lux of illumination intensity, temperature of 20–25°C, and 40% relative humidity. Forty days after incubation, sunflower seedlings were taken out from the pot and the roots washed with tap water. The number of tubercles was recorded on the root of each differential host. Race types were determined based on the reaction (tubercule formation on roots) of all the standard differential hosts to the test isolate. The results showed that races A, D, E, and G of O. cumana were present among the isolates. Race G was found in Wuqianqi, Xixiaozhao, and Linhe in the western part of Inner Mongolia. Race E was found only in Shihezi of Xinjiang. Race D was found in Aohanqi and Keyouqianqi (eastern part of Inner Mongolia); Xinyuan, Tekesi, Beitun, and Urumqi (northern part of Xinjiang); and Tongyu (northern part of Jilin). Race A was found in Mizhi, Shilou, and Hunyuan of Shanxi province and Xuanhua in Hebei province. Additionally, race A was also found in Tuzuoqi, the middle region of Inner Mongolia. Thus, races A, D, E, and G were the main race types of O. cumana in China. Race D was the predominant race type and had the widest distribution. Race G was the highest level race type in this study but was mainly limited to the western part of Inner Mongolia. This is the first report of race composition and distribution of sunflower broomrape (O. cumana) in China. References: (1) Y. Kaya et al. Helia 40:211, 2004. (2) A. N. Pancenko, Zbirnik VNIIMK. Page 107, 1973. (3) C. Parker. Page 17 in: Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Orobanche and Related Striga Research, 1994. (4) P. Shindrova et al. Helia 35:87, 2012.


Plants ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1810
Author(s):  
Dana Sisou ◽  
Yaakov Tadmor ◽  
Dina Plakhine ◽  
Hammam Ziadna ◽  
Sariel Hübner ◽  
...  

Infestations with sunflower broomrape (Orobanche cumana Wallr.), an obligatory root parasite, constitute a major limitation to sunflower production in many regions around the world. Breeding for resistance is the most effective approach to reduce sunflower broomrape infestation, yet resistance mechanisms are often broken by new races of the pathogen. Elucidating the mechanisms controlling resistance to broomrape at the molecular level is, thus, a desirable way to obtain long-lasting resistance. In this study, we investigated broomrape resistance in a confectionery sunflower cultivar with a robust and long-lasting resistance to sunflower broomrape. Visual screening and histological examination of sunflower roots revealed that penetration of the broomrape haustorium into the sunflower roots was blocked at the cortex, indicating a pre-haustorial mechanism of resistance. A comparative RNA sequencing between broomrape-resistant and -susceptible accessions allowed the identification of genes that were significantly differentially expressed upon broomrape infestation. Among these genes were β-1,3-endoglucanase, β-glucanase, and ethylene-responsive transcription factor 4 (ERF4). These genes were previously reported to be pathogenesis-related in other plant species. This transcriptomic investigation, together with the histological examinations, led us to conclude that the resistance mechanism involves the identification of the broomrape and the consequent formation of a physical barrier that prevents the establishment of the broomrape into the sunflower roots.


Helia ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (51) ◽  
pp. 111-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joita Pacureanu ◽  
S. Raranciuc ◽  
E. Sava ◽  
D. Stanciu ◽  
D. Nastase

2011 ◽  
Vol 131 (1) ◽  
pp. 220-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo Velasco ◽  
Begoña Pérez-Vich ◽  
Ahmed A. M. Yassein ◽  
Chao-Chien Jan ◽  
José M. Fernández-Martínez

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. S. Antonova ◽  
N. M. Araslanova ◽  
E. A. Strelnikov ◽  
S. A. Ramazanova ◽  
S. Z. Guchetl ◽  
...  

Plant Disease ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 683-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Zhang ◽  
R. Jia ◽  
Y. Zhang ◽  
M. Li ◽  
H. Zhou ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document