scholarly journals Coagulation Assay and Stroke Severity upon Admission of Patients with Cardioembolic Cerebral Infarction during Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use

Author(s):  
Ichiro Deguchi ◽  
Takashi Osada ◽  
Masaki Takao ◽  
Shinichi Takahashi
2019 ◽  
Vol 266 (9) ◽  
pp. 2263-2272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elias Auer ◽  
Sebastién Frey ◽  
Johannes Kaesmacher ◽  
Arsany Hakim ◽  
David J. Seiffge ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 1773-1780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuo Yamashiro ◽  
Naohide Kurita ◽  
Ryota Tanaka ◽  
Yuji Ueno ◽  
Nobukazu Miyamoto ◽  
...  

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Suda ◽  
Yasuyuki Iguchi ◽  
Shigeru Fujimoto ◽  
Yoshiki Yagita ◽  
Takayuki Mizunari ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: The characteristics of patients with stroke prior receiving direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) have not been fully clarified. We planned to recruit patients prospectively and to investigate the characteristics and outcomes in stroke patients taking DOAC and warfarin treatment prior to the event. Methods: The prospective analysis of stroke patients taking anticoagulants (PASTA) registry study is an observational, multicenter, prospective registry of stroke patients receiving OAC. Patient enrollment started in April 2016 at 25 tertiary centers across Japan. We compared clinical characteristics and discharge modified Rankin Scale (mRS) between DOAC-and warfarin-treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Results: A total of 580 patients (231 women; median age 80 [quartiles 73-84] years) were analyzed (Fig. A). Of these, 365 patients (63%) received prior DOAC treatment and the remaining 215 (37%) received prior warfarin treatment (Fig. B and C). There were significant differences in clinical characteristics and outcome between DOAC-and warfarin-treatment prior to the event regarding initial NIHSS score (median [quartiles]: DOAC, 4 [2-16] vs. warfarin, 9 [3-21]; P =0.0001), rate of medium-large size of infarct (DOAC, 202/340 [59%] versus warfarin, 152/203 [75%]; P =0.0003) and the proportion of patients with favorable outcome (mRS, 0-3: DOAC 218/354 [62%] vs. warfarin 108/212 [49%]; P =0.0036). Subclassification according to DOAC dosing revealed patients with low-dose (259/365; 71%) to be older and to have a higher NIHSS score compared with regular dose (low-dose, 5 [2-17] vs. regular-dose, 3 [1-11]; P =0.0023) (Fig. D). Type of DOAC agent did not result in relevant differences in clinical characteristics or outcome (Fig. E). Conclusions: Our results showed that patients with DOAC treatment before the event showed smaller infarct size, milder initial stroke severity, and favorable outcome compared to patients with warfarin.


Author(s):  
Saad S. Hussain ◽  
Alan H. Tyroch ◽  
Debabrata Mukherjee

2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 336
Author(s):  
Kevin Wheelock ◽  
Joseph Ross ◽  
Karthik Murugiah ◽  
Zhenqiu Lin ◽  
Harlan Krumholz ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document