Corporations: Foreign Corporations: Doing Business in the State: State Control: Taxation of Intra-State Business

1906 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 479
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
State Control ◽  
Doing Business ◽  
Foreign Corporations

Foreign Corporations Doing Business in the State

1908 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 317
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
Doing Business ◽  
Foreign Corporations

Corporations

2020 ◽  
pp. 307-328
Author(s):  
Richard B. Collins ◽  
Dale A. Oesterle ◽  
Lawrence Friedman
Keyword(s):  
Eminent Domain ◽  
The State ◽  
Legislative Power ◽  
Section 8 ◽  
Doing Business ◽  
Private Corporations ◽  
Foreign Corporations

This chapter assesses Article XV of the Colorado Constitution, concerning corporations. Section 2 forbids special corporate charters and requires the state to have a general incorporation code. Section 3 reserves legislative power to revoke, alter, or amend the charters of private corporations. Section 5 is an antitrust rule specific to railroads, and Section 6 forbids railroads’ discrimination among customers. Section 8’s guarantees the general assembly’s power of eminent domain over property held by corporations. Section 10 requires foreign corporations doing business in the state to have a place of business and resident agent in Colorado. Section 12’s ban on retrospective laws should be read with Article II, Section 11.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT PEOPLE’S RIGHTS OVER THE CLEAN WATER

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 38
Author(s):  
Muhammad Nadzir
Keyword(s):  
Water Management ◽  
Human Life ◽  
The State ◽  
Responsibility To Protect ◽  
Clean Water ◽  
State Control ◽  
Government Responsibility ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

Water plays a very important role in supporting human life and other living beings as goods that meet public needs. Water is one of the declared goods controlled by the state as mentioned in the constitution of the republic of Indonesia. The state control over water indicated that water management can bring justice and prosperity for all Indonesian people. However, in fact, water currently becomes a product commercialized by individuals and corporations. It raised a question on how the government responsibility to protect the people's right to clean water. This study found that in normative context, the government had been responsible in protecting the people’s right over the clean water. However, in practical context, it found that the government had not fully protected people's right over clean water. The government still interpreted the state control over water in the form of creating policies, establishing a set of regulations, conducting management, and also supervision.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document