Angus Macintyre. On ω1-categorical theories of abelian groups. Fundamenta mathematicae, vol. 70 (1971), pp. 253–270. - Angus Macintyre. On ω1-categorical theories of fields. Fundamenta mathematicae, vol. 71 (1971), pp. 1–25. - Joachim Reineke. Minimale Gruppen. Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, vol. 21 (1975), pp. 357–359. - J. T. Baldwin and Jan Saxl. Logical stability in group theory. The journal of the Australian Mathematical Society, vol. 21 ser. A (1976), pp. 267–276. - B. I. Zil'bér. Gruppy i kol'ca, téoriá kotoryh katégorična (Groups and rings with a categorical theory). Fundamenta mathematicae, vol. 95 (1977), pp. 173–188. - Walter Baur, Gregory Cherlin, and Angus Macintyre. Totally categorical groups and rings. Journal of algebra, vol. 57 (1979), pp. 407–440. - Gregory Cherlin. Groups of small Morley rank. Annals of mathematical logic, vol. 17 (1979), pp. 1–28. - G. Cherlin and S. Shelah. Superstable fields and groups. Annals of mathematical logic, vol. 18 (1980), pp. 227–270. - Bruno Poizat. Sous-groupes définissables d 'un groupe stable. The journal of symbolic logic, vol. 46 (1981), pp. 137–146.

1984 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 317-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anand Pillay

1965 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. H. Bruck

In the course of preparing a book on group theory [1] with special reference to the Restricted Burnside Problem and allied problems I stumbled upon the concept of a dimension-linking operator. Later, when I lectured to the Third Summer Institute of the Australian Mathematical Society [2], G. E. Wall raised the question whether the dimension-linking operators could be made into a ring by introduction of a suitable definition of multiplication. The answer was easily found to be affirmative; the result wasthat the theory of dimen sion-linking operators became exceedingly simple.



2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-134
Author(s):  
Daniel Turetsky


1984 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 1171-1184 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Loveys

The Classification Theorem for ℵ0-categorical strictly minimal sets says that if H is strictly minimal and ℵ0-categorical, either H has in effect no structure at all or is essentially an affine or projective space over a finite field. Zil′ber, in [Z2], showed that if H were a counterexample to this Classification Theorem it would interpret a rank 2, degree 1 pseudoplane. Cherlin later noticed (see [CHL, Appendices 2 and 3], for the proof) that the Classification Theorem is a consequence of the Classification Theorem for finite simple groups. In [Z4] and [Z5], Zil′ber found a quite different proof of the Classification Theorem using no deep group theory.Meanwhile in [Z3], Zil′ber introduced the notion of envelope in an attempt to prove that no complete totally categorical theory T can be finitely axiomatizable. The idea of the proof was to show that if M is a model of such a T and H ⊆ M is strongly minimal, then an envelope of any sufficiently large finite subset of H is a finite model of any fixed finite subset of T. [Z3] contains an error, which Zil′ber has since corrected (in a nontrivial way).In [CHL], Cherlin, Harrington and Lachlan used the Classification Theorem to expand and reorganize Zil′ber's work. In particular, they generalized most of his work to ℵ0-categorical, ℵ0-stable structures, proved the Morley rank is finite in these structures, and introduced the powerful Coordinatization Theorem (Theorem 3.1 of [CHL]; Proposition 1.14 of the present paper). They also showed that ℵ0-categorical, ℵ0-stable structures are not finitely axiomatizable using a notion of envelope that is the same as Zil′ber's except in one particularly perverse case; [CHL]'s notion of envelope is used throughout the current paper. Peretyat'kin [P] has found an example of an ℵ1-categorical finitely axiomatizable structure.



1966 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 512-512
Author(s):  
I. D. Macdonald

Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society 4 (1964), 452–453The second paragraph should be deleted. The alleged commutator identity (3) is false and is certainly not due to Philip Hall. The correct form isas Dr. N. D. Gupta of Canberra has pointed out to me. According to Professor B. H. Neumann, this identity appeared in his (Professor Neumann's) thesis.Nevertheless the theorem is valid and the proof given is correct.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document