Subformula property in many-valued modal logics

1994 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 1263-1273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitio Takano
Keyword(s):  
Sequent Calculus ◽  
Kripke Model ◽  
Modal Logics ◽  
Cut Elimination ◽  
Accessibility Relation ◽  
Cut Rule ◽  
Modal Model ◽  
The Many ◽  
Fitting In ◽  
Subformula Property

Fitting, in [1] and [2], investigated two families of many-valued modal logics. The first, which is somewhat familiar in the literature, is that of the logics characterized using a many-valued version of the Kripke model (binary modal model in his terminology) with a two-valued accessibility relation. On the other hand, those logics which are characterized using another many-valued version of the Kripke model (implicational modal model), with a many-valued accessibility relation, form the second family. Although he gave a sequent calculus for each of these logics, it is far from having the cut-elimination property (CEP) or the subformula property. So we will give a substitute for his system enjoying the subformula property, though it is not of ordinary sequent calculus but of the many-valued version of sequent calculus initiated by Takahashi [7] and Rousseau [3].The author, unaware of the deduction systems with CEP, had given in [8] and [9], after Rousseau [4], the deduction systems for the intuitionistic many-valued logics which enjoy CEP only for a certain restricted class of proofs. Then in [10], he gave for three-valued modal logics the ones with CEP, but these systems have a rule of inference which is unnecessary if the Cut rule is present. Why are we particular about CEP? The author's answer is that a cut-free proof is easy to examine since it is composed solely of subformulas of the formulas which form its conclusion. In this direction, the author has given, for modal logics with the Brouwerian axiom [11], the ones without CEP which nevertheless enjoy the subformula property. This paper is a sequel to the study in [11].

Gentzen sequent calculi for some intuitionistic modal logics

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 596-623
Author(s):  
Zhe Lin ◽  
Minghui Ma
Keyword(s):  
Propositional Logic ◽  
Sequent Calculus ◽  
Modal Logics ◽  
Cut Elimination ◽  
Sequent Calculi ◽  
Intuitionistic Propositional Logic ◽  
Propositional Language ◽  
Intuitionistic Modal Logics ◽  
Subformula Property ◽  
Gentzen Sequent Calculus

Abstract Intuitionistic modal logics are extensions of intuitionistic propositional logic with modal axioms. We treat with two modal languages ${\mathscr{L}}_\Diamond $ and $\mathscr{L}_{\Diamond ,\Box }$ which extend the intuitionistic propositional language with $\Diamond $ and $\Diamond ,\Box $, respectively. Gentzen sequent calculi are established for several intuitionistic modal logics. In particular, we introduce a Gentzen sequent calculus for the well-known intuitionistic modal logic $\textsf{MIPC}$. These sequent calculi admit cut elimination and subformula property. They are decidable.

scholarly journals A Modified Subformula Property for the Modal Logic S4.2

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitio Takano
Keyword(s):  
Modal Logic ◽  
Sequent Calculus ◽  
Interpolation Property ◽  
Modal Logics ◽  
Finite Model ◽  
Model Property ◽  
Cut Rule ◽  
Finite Model Property ◽  
Axiom A ◽  
Subformula Property

The modal logic S4.2 is S4 with the additional axiom ◊□A ⊃ □◊A. In this article, the sequent calculus GS4.2 for this logic is presented, and by imposing an appropriate restriction on the application of the cut-rule, it is shown that, every GS4.2-provable sequent S has a GS4.2-proof such that every formula occurring in it is either a subformula of some formula in S, or the formula □¬□B or ¬□B, where □B occurs in the scope of some occurrence of □ in some formula of S. These are just the K5-subformulas of some formula in S which were introduced by us to show the modied subformula property for the modal logics K5 and K5D (Bull Sect Logic 30(2): 115–122, 2001). Some corollaries including the interpolation property for S4.2 follow from this. By slightly modifying the proof, the finite model property also follows.

The consistency of arithmetic

2021 ◽  
pp. 268-311
Author(s):  
Paolo Mancosu ◽  
Sergio Galvan ◽  
Richard Zach
Keyword(s):  
Simple Proof ◽  
Sequent Calculus ◽  
Cut Elimination ◽  
Successor Function ◽  
Cut Rule ◽  
Original Proof ◽  
First Order ◽  
Successive Elimination ◽  
Pure Logic ◽  
Classical Arithmetic

This chapter opens the part of the book that deals with ordinal proof theory. Here the systems of interest are not purely logical ones, but rather formalized versions of mathematical theories, and in particular the first-order version of classical arithmetic built on top of the sequent calculus. Classical arithmetic goes beyond pure logic in that it contains a number of specific axioms for, among other symbols, 0 and the successor function. In particular, it contains the rule of induction, which is the essential rule characterizing the natural numbers. Proving a cut-elimination theorem for this system is hopeless, but something analogous to the cut-elimination theorem can be obtained. Indeed, one can show that every proof of a sequent containing only atomic formulas can be transformed into a proof that only applies the cut rule to atomic formulas. Such proofs, which do not make use of the induction rule and which only concern sequents consisting of atomic formulas, are called simple. It is shown that simple proofs cannot be proofs of the empty sequent, i.e., of a contradiction. The process of transforming the original proof into a simple proof is quite involved and requires the successive elimination, among other things, of “complex” cuts and applications of the rules of induction. The chapter describes in some detail how this transformation works, working through a number of illustrative examples. However, the transformation on its own does not guarantee that the process will eventually terminate in a simple proof.

PROOF SYSTEMS FOR VARIOUS FDE-BASED MODAL LOGICS

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 720-747
Author(s):  
SERGEY DROBYSHEVICH ◽  
HEINRICH WANSING
Keyword(s):  
Modal Logic ◽  
Sequent Calculus ◽  
Axiom System ◽  
Modal Logics ◽  
Cut Elimination ◽  
Proof Systems ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Axiomatic Extension

AbstractWe present novel proof systems for various FDE-based modal logics. Among the systems considered are a number of Belnapian modal logics introduced in Odintsov & Wansing (2010) and Odintsov & Wansing (2017), as well as the modal logic KN4 with strong implication introduced in Goble (2006). In particular, we provide a Hilbert-style axiom system for the logic $BK^{\square - } $ and characterize the logic BK as an axiomatic extension of the system $BK^{FS} $. For KN4 we provide both an FDE-style axiom system and a decidable sequent calculus for which a contraction elimination and a cut elimination result are shown.

Gentzen's Proof Systems: Byproducts in a Work of Genius

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan von Plato
Keyword(s):  
Natural Deduction ◽  
Sequent Calculus ◽  
Central Component ◽  
Cut Elimination ◽  
Complete Class ◽  
Tree Form ◽  
Proof Systems ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Logical Calculi ◽  
Subformula Property

AbstractGentzen's systems of natural deduction and sequent calculus were byproducts in his program of proving the consistency of arithmetic and analysis. It is suggested that the central component in his results on logical calculi was the use of a tree form for derivations. It allows the composition of derivations and the permutation of the order of application of rules, with a full control over the structure of derivations as a result. Recently found documents shed new light on the discovery of these calculi. In particular, Gentzen set up five different forms of natural calculi and gave a detailed proof of normalization for intuitionistic natural deduction. An early handwritten manuscript of his thesis shows that a direct translation from natural deduction to the axiomatic logic of Hilbert and Ackermann was, in addition to the influence of Paul Hertz, the second component in the discovery of sequent calculus. A system intermediate between the sequent calculus LI and axiomatic logic, denoted LIG in unpublished sources, is implicit in Gentzen's published thesis of 1934–35. The calculus has half rules, half “groundsequents,” and does not allow full cut elimination. Nevertheless, a translation from LI to LIG in the published thesis gives a subformula property for a complete class of derivations in LIG. After the thesis, Gentzen continued to work on variants of sequent calculi for ten more years, in the hope to find a consistency proof for arithmetic within an intuitionistic calculus.

scholarly journals Lambda terms for natural deduction, sequent calculus and cut elimination

2000 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
HENK BARENDREGT ◽  
SILVIA GHILEZAN
Keyword(s):  
Normal Form ◽  
Natural Deduction ◽  
Sequent Calculus ◽  
The Other ◽  
Cut Elimination ◽  
Simple Consequence ◽  
Type Assignment ◽  
Two Systems ◽  
The Many

It is well known that there is an isomorphism between natural deduction derivations and typed lambda terms. Moreover, normalising these terms corresponds to eliminating cuts in the equivalent sequent calculus derivations. Several papers have been written on this topic. The correspondence between sequent calculus derivations and natural deduction derivations is, however, not a one-one map, which causes some syntactic technicalities. The correspondence is best explained by two extensionally equivalent type assignment systems for untyped lambda terms, one corresponding to natural deduction (λN) and the other to sequent calculus (λL). These two systems constitute different grammars for generating the same (type assignment relation for untyped) lambda terms. The second grammar is ambiguous, but the first one is not. This fact explains the many-one correspondence mentioned above. Moreover, the second type assignment system has a ‘cut-free’ fragment (λLcf). This fragment generates exactly the typeable lambda terms in normal form. The cut elimination theorem becomes a simple consequence of the fact that typed lambda terms possess a normal form.

scholarly journals Partial cut elimination for propositional discrete linear time temporal logic

2010 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jūratė Sakalauskaitė
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Sequent Calculus ◽  
Linear Time ◽  
Canonical Model ◽  
Cut Elimination ◽  
Sequent Calculi ◽  
Cut Rule ◽  
Linear Time Temporal Logic

We consider propositional discrete linear time temporal logic with future and past operators of time. For each formula ϕ of this logic, we present Gentzen-type sequent calculus Gr(ϕ) with a restricted cut rule. We sketch a proof of the soundness and the completeness of the sequent calculi presented. The completeness is proved via construction of a canonical model.

Many-Vawed Modal Logics II

1992 ◽  
Vol 17 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 55-73
Author(s):  
Melvin Fitting
Keyword(s):  
Kripke Model ◽  
Natural Generalization ◽  
Modal Logics ◽  
Dominance Relation ◽  
Kripke Models ◽  
Modal Language ◽  
Truth Values ◽  
The Many

Suppose there are several experts, with some dominating others (expert A dominates expert B if B says something is true whenever A says it is). Suppose, further, that each of the experts has his or her own view of what is possible – in other words each of the experts has their own Kripke model in mind (subject, of course, to the dominance relation that may hold between experts). How will they assign truth values to sentences in a common modal language, and on what sentences will they agree? This problem can be reformulated as one about many-valued Kripke models, allowing many-valued accessibility relations. This is a natural generalization of conventional Kripke models that has only recently been looked at. The equivalence between the many-valued version and the multiple expert one will be formally established. Finally we will axiomatize many-valued modal logics, and sketch a proof of completeness.

scholarly journals Semantical Proof of Subformula Property for the Modal Logics K 4.3, KD 4.3, and S4.3

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daishi Yazaki
Keyword(s):  
Sequent Calculus ◽  
Modal Logics ◽  
Finite Model ◽  
Inference Rules ◽  
Sequent Calculi ◽  
Model Property ◽  
Finite Model Property ◽  
Subformula Property

The main purpose of this paper is to give alternative proofs of syntactical and semantical properties, i.e. the subformula property and the nite model property, of the sequent calculi for the modal logics K4.3, KD4.3, and S4.3. The application of the inference rules is said to be acceptable, if all the formulas in the upper sequents are subformula of the formulas in lower sequent. For some modal logics, Takano analyzed the relationships between the acceptable inference rules and semantical properties by constructing models. By using these relationships, he showed Kripke completeness and subformula property. However, his method is difficult to apply to inference rules for the sequent calculi for K4.3, KD4.3, and S4.3. Lookinglosely at Takano's proof, we nd that his method can be modied to construct nite models based on the sequent calculus for K4.3, if the calculus has (cut) and all the applications of the inference rules are acceptable. Similarly, we can apply our results to the calculi for KD4.3 and S4.3. This leads not only to Kripke completeness and subformula property, but also to finite model property of these logics simultaneously.

scholarly journals PROOF-THEORETIC ANALYSIS OF THE QUANTIFIED ARGUMENT CALCULUS

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 607-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
EDI PAVLOVIĆ ◽  
NORBERT GRATZL
Keyword(s):  
Proof Theory ◽  
Natural Deduction ◽  
Sequent Calculus ◽  
Cut Elimination ◽  
Theoretic Analysis ◽  
Subformula Property

AbstractThis article investigates the proof theory of the Quantified Argument Calculus (Quarc) as developed and systematically studied by Hanoch Ben-Yami [3, 4]. Ben-Yami makes use of natural deduction (Suppes-Lemmon style), we, however, have chosen a sequent calculus presentation, which allows for the proofs of a multitude of significant meta-theoretic results with minor modifications to the Gentzen’s original framework, i.e., LK. As will be made clear in course of the article LK-Quarc will enjoy cut elimination and its corollaries (including subformula property and thus consistency).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document