Due Process in Performance Appraisal: A Quasi-Experiment in Procedural Justice

1995 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 495 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Susan Taylor ◽  
Kay B. Tracy ◽  
Monika K. Renard ◽  
J. Kline Harrison ◽  
Stephen J. Carroll
2006 ◽  
Vol 99 (3) ◽  
pp. 819-832 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heloneida C. Kataoka ◽  
Nina D. Cole ◽  
Douglas A. Flint

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Ispas ◽  
Alexandra Ilie ◽  
Russell E. Johnson ◽  
Dragos Iliescu ◽  
Walter C. Borman

2003 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A. Posthuma

This article compares and contrasts a legal concept known as procedural due process with a psychological concept known as procedural justice. The two concepts are defined and distinguished. Then the similarities between the two concepts are demonstrated by showing how they share similar dimensions and underlying rationale. It is suggested that dimensions of procedural due process may be useful to understand the dimensions of procedural justice. In addition, the procedural due process “balancing test” is adapted and applied to the concept of procedural justice in workplace settings. Applications to personnel management are illustrated.


Author(s):  
Bienwi-Patrick, Ledum ◽  
B. Chima Onuoha ◽  
Best C. Eke

Performance Appraisal system represents a major tool for most of the organizations to evaluate various aspects of their employees. Despite the prominence of the organizational phenomenon, very limited research is done in Nigerian organization in this area .To analyses the perception of employees regarding the performance appraisal system implementation, the Deposit Money Banks in Port Harcourt, Rivers state are selected due to the reported high rate of staff turnover. In order to analyze the perception of employees regarding the new system and its implementation, 33 item questionnaires consist of 4 independent and one dependent variables was distributed among 150 employees who were acquainted with the Performance appraisal procedure. The study employed four measures of performance appraisal which are Procedural justice, Goal setting, feedback and Pay for performance and one criterion variable, the employee perception towards these performance appraisal process. The instrument used was a 5 point Likert scale questionnaire. Factor analysis and regression analysis was done through the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 25.The result shows the process was implemented as per organization guidelines to the overall satisfaction of employees. There are however some areas of improvement which have been noted in the conclusion. The results and outcome are in line with international published data. KEYWORDS: Employee Perception, Performance Appraisal, Procedural Justice.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 434-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carrie Anne Belsito ◽  
Christopher Ray Reutzel

Purpose This study aims to examine the influence of employee performance appraisal (PA) formalization on changes to one component of the employee–leadership social exchange relationship within the context of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Specifically, it builds upon extant research on human resource management within SMEs, performance appraisals and social exchange theory to consider the role of performance appraisal formalization in effecting change in the level of trust employees have in their leaders. Design/methodology/approach To test study hypotheses, this study analyzes responses to two survey waves completed by employees of a US-based SME operating within the commercial construction industry. This SME formalized the PA process in between the administration of the first and second surveys. Study data were analyzed using hierarchical ordinary least squares regression. Findings The results of this study suggest that the formalization of PA has a positive effect on change in trust in leadership (TIL). Study results also suggest that employee perceptions of PA utility, procedural justice and satisfaction with the PA process are positively related to changes in TIL. This study also found that the effects of employee perceptions of PA utility and procedural justice on changes in TIL are mediated by employee satisfaction with the PA process. Research limitations/implications As a consequence of study design, the results found in this study may be limited with respect to their external validity. Researchers and practitioners are encouraged to use caution before generalizing study findings to other contexts. Practical implications This study suggests that PA formalization represents a means of increasing employee trust. Moreover, study results suggest that SME leaders hoping to increase employee TIL should be thoughtful about how they implement the PA process, paying particular attention to the usefulness of the feedback they provide and ensuring that the process of PA is viewed as being fair by employees. In doing so, SME leaders will enhance their employees’ satisfaction with the PA process, thereby increasing the trust they place in SME leadership. Originality/value This study extends research by considering the consequences of PA formalization with respect to changes in SME employee TIL. In doing so, this study heeds calls for additional research on the consequences of PA within SMEs, as well as sheds light on how PA formalization shapes the relationship between SME employees and leaders.


2020 ◽  
pp. 088740342091119
Author(s):  
Clare Farmer

Across Australia, patron banning measures address alcohol-related behavioral issues in entertainment districts. This article compares the legislative framing of Victoria’s licensee barring order policy with the experiences of recipients. The rationale and operational expectations for licensee barring are examined in relation to key themes which emerged during parliamentary debates of the legislation, and contrasted with the reported experiences of recipients. The findings point to a disconnect between the expected and actual operation of licensee barring, an absence of oversight, and a tangible risk of misuse. Barring orders extend to ordinary citizens a unique police-enforceable power to punish, yet licensees currently act without scrutiny or accountability. A review of barring policy is recommended to ensure a robust process for effective monitoring, meaningful consequences for the misuse of barring powers, and deeper consideration of the attendant risks to due process and procedural justice of the civilianisation of punishment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document