The Great Knob: Interpretations of Monks Mound. Mikels Skele. Studies in Illinois Archaeology No. 4. Illinois Historic Preservation Agency, Springfield, 1988. ix + 112 pp., illustrations. $7.00 (paper).

1991 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 379-379
Author(s):  
Mark Mehrer
Keyword(s):  
Historic Preservation ◽  
Monks Mound

Este lugar sí importa

2016 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 52-74
Author(s):  
Laura Dominguez
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Cultural Identity ◽  
Historic Preservation ◽  
East Los Angeles ◽  
Popular Imagination ◽  
Cultural Importance ◽  
Communities Of Color

The evolution and construction of cultural identity and memory in unincorporated East Los Angeles, both in scholarship and the popular imagination, establishes a critical framework for understanding changing relationships between communities of color and the broader historic preservation movement. East Los Angeles embodies slowly shifting paradigms within the historic preservation movement that compel practitioners and advocates to contend with the meaning of seemingly ordinary places that have tremendous cultural importance within their communities.

Historic Preservation for Professionals

2009 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 501-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andréa Livi Smith
Keyword(s):  
Historic Preservation

Report on Cultural Conservation Being Prepared

1982 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-11
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Historic Preservation ◽  
Federal Agencies ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Full Extent ◽  
Field State ◽  
Cultural Conservation ◽  
State And Local ◽  
Historical Resources

The Department of the Interior and the American Folklife Center are engaged in a study to produce a report on cultural conservation. This report, authorized under Section 502 of the Historic Preservation Act Amendments of 1980, will examine the extent to which "intangible elements of our cultural heritage" are recognized in preservation efforts, and will recommend to the President and the Congress alternatives for extending to these elements "appropriate protection and benefits, such as those protections now accorded tangible historical resources." In order to produce a thorough appraisal of activities relating to cultural conservation, the report must consider the full extent of efforts in this field—state and local, public and private—as well as those of federal agencies.

scholarly journals Archeologists Sue EPA, State Historic Preservation Officer

1975 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 2-2
Author(s):  
Nan Rothschild
Keyword(s):  
Historic Preservation

The Opportunities and Limitations of Tribal Consultation in Studies Conducted Under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act

1998 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 5-8
Author(s):  
Gail Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Historic Preservation ◽  
Decision Maker ◽  
National Park ◽  
National Park Service ◽  
Development Projects ◽  
Cultural Resources ◽  
Cultural Properties ◽  
Park Service ◽  
Traditional Cultural Properties ◽  
National Historic Preservation Act

Proposed construction and development projects that require Federal permits are subject to review under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, which requires that the Federal decision-maker take into account the project's potential effects on cultural resources listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Over the years and especially after 1990 when the National Park Service released Bulletin 38, Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting Traditional Cultural Properties (TCPs), Section 106 review has increased the consideration of designating TCPs and consultation with the Indian tribal organizations that value them. Bulletin 38 defines TCPs as places that have been historically important in maintaining the cultural identify of a community.

Planning for Preservation: A Look at the Federal-State Historic Preservation Program, 1966-1986

1992 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 49-66
Author(s):  
Philip V. Scarpino
Keyword(s):  
Historic Preservation ◽  
Federal State

Historic Preservation for a Living City: Historic Charleston Foundation, 1947-1997

APT Bulletin ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
David G. Woodcock ◽  
Robert R. Weyeneth
Keyword(s):  
Historic Preservation

Not over my backyard: the regulatory conflict between 5G rollout and environmental and historic preservation

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin W. Cramer
Keyword(s):  
Historic Preservation ◽  
Telecommunications Policy ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Property ◽  
5G Network ◽  
Local Areas ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Critical Policy ◽  
Near Future

Purpose This paper aims to analyze the environmental and historic preservation precedents that have been adopted and acknowledged by telecommunications firms when expanding their physical infrastructures. Design/methodology/approach This paper will conduct a policy analysis of contradictory regulatory goals that are expected to arise during the near-future rollout of 5G in the USA. This will be done via traditional legal research combined with a critical policy focus. Particular attention will be given to the public interest remedies that have been established for companies that have used private or public property. Findings Due to the spatial requirements of 5G network infrastructure, telecommunications policy (in which network development is paramount) is expected to conflict with land use-oriented regulations (environmental and historic preservation) in places where new 5G infrastructure must be approved and built. Social implications Ultimately, the paper will argue that conflicts will arise in local areas where the 5G rollout is expected to impact environmentally pristine areas or historic buildings. Originality/value Research in the environmental effects of 5G technology in general is becoming common, but conflicts between network construction and particular environmental or historic preservation regulations has not been the topic of organized research thus far.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document