Role-Identity Salience

1985 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter L. Callero
2017 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. 99-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johnna Capitano ◽  
Marco S. DiRenzo ◽  
Kathryn J. Aten ◽  
Jeffrey H. Greenhaus

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Salima Hamouche ◽  
Alain Marchand

PurposeBased on identity theory, identity represents a set of meanings individuals hold for themselves based on their role in the society. Hence, they often engage in the process of verifying their role, seeking for the compatibility between these meanings and those perceived in a specific lived situation. If this compatibility is not perceived, this is likely to generate negative emotions. that could compromise their mental health. This paper examines the contribution of a weak verification of role identity in the explanation of managers ‘burnout. It aims at integrating identity theory into occupational stress research by analysing the proposition that a low level of verification of a salient role-identity will be associated with a high level of burnout. Hence, we consider identity salience as a moderating variable.Design/methodology/approachCross-sectional data of 314 Canadian managers employed in 56 Quebec firms. Multilevel regression analyses were performed to analyse the data.FindingsLow levels of verification of some standards of managers' role identity, mainly work demands and recognition which encompasses (monetary and non-monetary recognition, career prospects and job security) are significantly associated with managers' burnout. Furthermore, as predicted, results show that identity salience plays a moderating role on the relation between a weak verification of some standards of managers' role identity and burnout, mainly work demands, superior support and recognition.Originality/valueThis study proposes a relatively unexplored approach for the study of managers' burnout. It broadens the scope of research on workplace mental health issues, by the integration of the identity theory.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Tekieli ◽  
Marion Festing ◽  
Xavier Baeten

Abstract. Based on responses from 158 reward managers located at the headquarters or subsidiaries of multinational enterprises, the present study examines the relationship between the centralization of reward management decision making and its perceived effectiveness in multinational enterprises. Our results show that headquarters managers perceive a centralized approach as being more effective, while for subsidiary managers this relationship is moderated by the manager’s role identity. Referring to social identity theory, the present study enriches the standardization versus localization debate through a new perspective focusing on psychological processes, thereby indicating the importance of in-group favoritism in headquarters and the influence of subsidiary managers’ role identities on reward management decision making.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Hawthorne ◽  
Meghan Huntoon ◽  
Amber Ferris ◽  
Jessi L. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Low Ses ◽  

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan Schaibley ◽  
Jay Jackson ◽  
Jazzmin Doxsee ◽  
Bhavika Mistry

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document