Growth and Development of Northern Great Plains Species in Relation to Nitrogen Fertilization

1970 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 112
Author(s):  
Harold Goetz
Weed Science ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 158-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek W. Lewis ◽  
Robert H. Gulden

Kochia is a weed found in many sunflower fields across the Northern Great Plains. There is limited information about the ability of sunflower plants to compete with kochia, specifically when the weed grows both in the crop row and in the inter-row space, as in zero tillage systems that rely solely on herbicides to manage weeds. An experiment was conducted over seven site–yr, from 2009 to 2011, to determine the effect of kochia density and relative time of kochia seedling recruitment on sunflower growth and development, yield and seed quality. Kochia seed was broadcast on the soil surface at six densities, into sunflowers planted in 75-cm rows, either at the same time as the sunflower crop was planted (early weed seedling recruitment), or when the sunflowers were at the four-leaf stage (late weed seedling recruitment). When kochia plants emerged at the same time as the sunflowers, yield was reduced by up to 76% and sunflower head diam was reduced in four site–yr, stem diam was reduced in three site–yr, height was reduced in two site–yr and the number of leaves per sunflower plant was reduced in two site–yr The 5% action threshold for early emerging kochia was four kochia plants m−2in the combined site–yr analysis. Additionally, early recruiting kochia seedlings reduced sunflower seed size and seed weight at two and three site–yr, respectively. Kochia plants that emerged after the four-leaf stage of the sunflower crop did not affect sunflower growth and development, yield, or seed quality. To reduce the potential for yield and seed quality losses, sunflower growers should be proactive with respect to managing kochia in sunflowers, particularly when the kochia plants emerge at about the same time as the sunflowers.


2013 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 159-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robynn Anfinrud ◽  
Larry Cihacek ◽  
Burton L. Johnson ◽  
Yun Ji ◽  
Marisol T. Berti

1957 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 156 ◽  
Author(s):  
George A. Rogler ◽  
Russell J. Lorenz

1996 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 340 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. S. Jacobsen ◽  
S. H. Lorbeer ◽  
H. A. R. Houlton ◽  
G. R. Carlson

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 218-229
Author(s):  
C.G. Davidson ◽  
S.M. Gobin

Abstract A total of 160 grass or grass-like species/cultivars were evaluated under field conditions for a period of four years. Detailed assessments of survival, growth and development are presented. Horticultural evaluations were completed on all material, providing a basis for making recommendations for utilization of grasses in the landscape in colder regions (USDA zone 3) of the Great Plains. Thirty accessions were identified with very good to outstanding visual appeal. Plants that were rated very high for horticultural value included: big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), feathertop (Calamagrostis epigejos), many of the sedges (Carex sp.), plumegrass (Erianthus ravennae), Hervier's fescue (Festuca hervierri), Leman's fescue (Festuca lemanii), tall purple rhoorgrass (Molinia caerulea spp. arundinacea cv. Skyracer), switchgrass species and cultivars (Panicum virgatum cv. Haense Herms, Heavy Metal and Strictum), ravenna grass (Saccharum ravennae) and variegated cordgrass (Spartina pectinata cv. Aureo-marginata). Eighteen accessions were removed from the test mainly due to their invasive nature (e.g., Bromus inermis cv. Skinner's Golden, Elymus spp., Glyceria maxima and Phragmites australis). Of the remaining 142 accessions, 71.8% had at least one plant remaining at the end of the test period (1996).


2007 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 1208-1218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Gan ◽  
S. S. Malhi ◽  
S. Brandt ◽  
F. Katepa-Mupondwa ◽  
H. R. Kutcher

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document