Academic Freedom and Tenure: Sonoma State University (California)

Academe ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 3
Author(s):  
Henry L. Mason ◽  
George Schatzki
Academe ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Ted Finman ◽  
Phoebe A. Haddon ◽  
Donald N. Koster

Academe ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
DeWitt Davis ◽  
Donald J. Reeb

Academe ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 94
Author(s):  
Matthew W. Finkin ◽  
Sanford Jacoby ◽  
Karen E. Lindenberg

2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 329-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim Butterfield ◽  
Ekaterina Levintova

Recently two new departments, the School of Broadcast Journalism and the Department of Political Science, were created at Moscow State University while leaving the two traditional departments that engendered them intact. The result has been a contestation over academic freedom, standards, and the very definition of both disciplines at Russia’s premier university. The new departments are both closely associated with United Russia, the dominant political party in Russian politics and the political movement designed to promote the priorities and policies of Prime Minister and former President Vladimir Putin. This paper examines the self-definition of each of the four departments by means of open-ended, semi-structured interviews with faculty and content-analytic examination of curricular materials, including syllabi and assigned readings. We conclude that the newer departments are somewhat more attuned to certain aspects of the international standards of both disciplines, but demonstrate little adherence to key ethical and pedagogical norms, leaving them more susceptible to political influence.


Academe ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
J. W. Patterson ◽  
Amy L. Vandersall

1993 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Tierney

In this article, William Tierney explores the historically vexed issue of academic freedom as it pertains to the contemporary constraints placed on "permissible" fields of study and discourse. Using a case study of a large state university, he addresses the overt and covert limitations that have been placed on study and discussion of gay, lesbian, and bisexual issues on the college campus. Tierney's findings reveal a paradox: at a university committed to the advancement of human understanding and academic openness, lesbian, gay, and bisexual faculty, staff, and students feel that their civil rights are threatened, which both implicitly and explicitly limits research pertaining to these issues. Through the lens of this case study, Tierney raises new questions and presents his own understanding of academic freedom.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document